I wonder what the naysayers will say after this compelling discovery? I guess this is the last nail on the coffin of EU!
Big Bang's Smoking Gun Found : Discovery News
Big Bang's Smoking Gun Found : Discovery News
EU stand for Electric Universe theory. This theory has been dismissed by the worlds scientists as having no validity.I haven't a clue what EU is, apart from European Union, but this is at least the third time this has been posted since yesterday.
Like evolution, the Urknall is just a theory.EU stand for Electric Universe theory. This theory has been dismissed by the worlds scientists as having no validity.
This new discovery basically proves beyond a doubt that the Big Bang theory is valid.
Although it has been explained to you countless of times that the word theory in science has a completely different meaning to the common use of the word; I shall once more enlighten you:Like evolution, the Urknall is just a theory.
In science, a theory is: "A set of statements or principles devised to explain a group of facts or phenomena, especially one that has been repeatedly tested or is widely accepted and can be used to make predictions about natural phenomena."Like evolution, the Urknall is just a theory.
Fine.In science, a theory is: "A set of statements or principles devised to explain a group of facts or phenomena, especially one that has been repeatedly tested or is widely accepted and can be used to make predictions about natural phenomena."
What's your point AV?Fine.
Like evolution, the Urknall is just a set of statements or principles devised to explain a group of facts or phenomena, especially one that has been repeatedly tested or is widely accepted and can be used to make predictions about natural phenomena.
Better now?
Like evolution, the Urknall is just a theory.What's your point AV?
Is the Two Moon theory just a theory?
Why are you assuming I'm using "theory" as "guess" now?Once more ...
Why are you assuming I'm using "theory" as "guess" now?
Mzungu already gave me the scientific use of the term, and I'm going with that now.
Does the word "just" in my posts mislead you?
Well, now that I've been "proven ignorant" by your video ... what's next?Why are you assuming that I'm assuming anything, and why are you making this personal?
My post is not about you. Its not about me, either. I merely posted something to help clarify a scientific term.
Well, now that I've been "proven ignorant" by your video ... what's next?
You think "proving me ignorant" is going to make a dent?
One of my favorite sayings here is: Eyes barn ignit, eyes die ignit.
I don't need some actor to think he's doing me a favor.
Well, now I'm disappointed.Would you please ignore the title of the video and just focus on the CONTENT of the video? I didn't put the title on the video. It was there already.
Sheesh! People are so hyper-sensitive around here, and take everything so personally. Get a grip!
Well, now I'm disappointed.
Are you saying I'm not ignorant?
I really don't appreciate that, but you're entitled to your opinion.
Alright ... I'll watch the thing and comment on it.Again - this has nothing to do with you personally!!!!
If you're going to remark on it, remark on the content of the video, NOT THE TITLE!!!
So, what do you say to the CONTENT of the video? Did you even watch it?