Would you agree that those who say otherwise are "science deniers?" I've heard from the political Left that to be a "science denier" is really a bad thing.
It's the U.S. Public Health Services Commissioned Corps. Not an actual branch, or affiliated to a branch of the military to my knowledge. For whatever reason, the government feels the need to give them ranks.
I'm not surprised she rose so far. Trans individuals have contributed a lot to healthcare.Biden Admin Names Rachel Levine, a Man, the 'First-Ever Female Four-Star Admiral' in Public Health Corps
The first-ever “female” four-star admiral in the public health corps is actually a man.
Yes, you heard that right.
It wasn't for want of an insulting term that I asked that question. I was asking about the meaning of the term--which, yes, is often used in a smug fashion. We often hear liberals say that the great unwashed masses, i. e. the rest of society, are science deniers for not agreeing to Global Warming or some of their other pet projects.I am not stooping to name calling, but males are men and females are women and biological science is extremely clear on this issue.
Probably. Just goes to show how desperate the right is, that their best shot at criticising the current administration is that they dont like one of the people being employed, and they cant even tell you what that person has done wrong, only that they disagree with the persons general existence.Your gonna be waiting awhile.
Asking for compassion might not be haughty, but it sure is superior to what some people in this thread are doing.That sounds rather haughty and superior. Even dismissive. And that would be discriminatory. Which in turn would be racist (which is a term that no longer has any necessary connection to race. It's just bad.).
If you imagine that this is the only foul-up or disastrous mistake made by Joe Biden, you not only have not read the list of failures that moderates of both parties--as well as conservatives--have referred to numerous times.Probably. Just goes to show how desperate the right is, that their best shot at criticising the current administration is that they dont like one of the people being employed, and they cant even tell you what that person has done wrong, only that they disagree with the persons general existence.
I don't know what you are referring to with that last part about what some people are doing, but asking for compassion is never haughty. What had been said by another poster in the rest of the sentence in question sounded that note, however.Asking for compassion might not be haughty, but it sure is superior to what some people in this thread are doing.
I had no idea you were a mental health professional and that you could evaluate a patient’s mental fitness without having ever met with them. That’s an incredible ability you have there.The fact that he has a severe mental disorder is reason enough that he shouldn't be practicing any form of medicine at the present time.
*him. He’s a dude in a dress.*her
Well, he doesn’t understand basic biology. That’s a start.I dont think so. I dont see how having gender disphoria impacts her ability to make the decisions neccessary for the job. I would love to see any actual faults on her part.
*heI'm not surprised she rose so far. Trans individuals have contributed a lot to healthcare.
So?*him. He’s a dude in a dress.
No.So?
I see women wearing jeans instead of dresses all the time. Is that a problem too?
Why not? The dress wearing part seemed to be such an important distinction that you brought up but somehow gender specific clothing doesn’t seem to matter to you in other situations. That’s called a double standard, I believe. You’re not applying the same rule evenly to every similar situation.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?