Biblically speaking

[yasic]

Biblically speaking, would it be a sin for 2 women who are both married to the same man to engage in sexual actions with one another?

I mean in another thread I heard that homosexual sex is condemned because it is outside of marriage, and homosexuals cannot marry, so I wondered how this would fall in place?

Genuinely curious to what people think?

 

[Supernaut]

Biblically speaking, would it be a sin for 2 women who are both married to the same man to engage in sexual actions with one another?

I mean in another thread I heard that homosexual sex is condemned because it is outside of marriage, and homosexuals cannot marry, so I wondered how this would fall in place?

Genuinely curious to what people think?

In the context of the post and with the general generic "thou shalt nots" of Scripture, it would be wrong simply because the women are married to the man and not one another.


*this post does not in any way reflect my true opinion.

 

[Wiccan_Child]

Biblically speaking, would it be a sin for 2 women who are both married to the same man to engage in sexual actions with one another?

I mean in another thread I heard that homosexual sex is condemned because it is outside of marriage, and homosexuals cannot marry, so I wondered how this would fall in place?

Genuinely curious to what people think?

It would be a sin because it's sex outside of marriage. The two women are committing adultery.

 

[Axioma]

On that topic, is it okay biblically for a man who is already married to one woman to marry a second if his first wife objects to it?

 

[david_x]

Biblically speaking, would it be a sin for 2 women who are both married to the same man to engage in sexual actions with one another?

I mean in another thread I heard that homosexual sex is condemned because it is outside of marriage, and homosexuals cannot marry, so I wondered how this would fall in place?

Genuinely curious to what people think?

Since the women are not married to each other, it would be wrong.

 

[cantata]

Since the women are not married to each other, it would be wrong.

But also hot.

 

[The Nihilist]

What if they both had sex with their husband at the same time? Is that allowed?

 

[david_x]

What if they both had sex with their husband at the same time? Is that allowed?

Probably up to the husband. It also seem pretty promiscuous so my gut says no.

 

[The Nihilist]

Probably up to the husband. It also seem pretty promiscuous so my gut says no.

Did you just equate your hangups on sexuality with the Will of God?

 

[david_x]

Did you just equate your hangups on sexuality with the Will of God?

No

I have no 'hangups on sexuality' and it was a simple judgement call. Mono a mono, I didn't even bring up the Will of God.

 

[The Nihilist]

No

I have no 'hangups on sexuality' and it was a simple judgement call. Mono a mono, I didn't even bring up the Will of God.

Oh come now, we all have hangups. For example, I wouldn't have relations with a turtle.
But isn't the will of God what we're talking about in this thread? (If I'm wrong, I'd love to hear what we actually are talking about.) And if that is what we're talking about, is your gut really an authority on that?

 

[david_x]

Oh come now, we all have hangups. For example, I wouldn't have relations with a turtle.
But isn't the will of God what we're talking about in this thread? (If I'm wrong, I'd love to hear what we actually are talking about.) And if that is what we're talking about, is your gut really an authority on that?

Like I said, no hangups. I do not represent the will of God. It was a gut call on my understanding of the Bible, dispute it or leave it.

*Biblically speaking*

 

[The Nihilist]

Like I said, no hangups. I do not represent the will of God. It was a gut call on my understanding of the Bible, dispute it or leave it.

*Biblically speaking*

Huh. It seems we're left with an uncomfortable little disconnect with the Will of God and our access to it.

 

[david_x]

Huh. It seems we're left with an uncomfortable little disconnect with the Will of God and our access to it.

What are you trolling about now?

 

[The Nihilist]

What are you trolling about now?

Well, you made a judgment call on a moral matter. If morality (previously referred to as the Will of God) is to be taken seriously by people, isn't it bothersome that it's a matter of judgment, and that it can be violated quite accidentally through ignorance? It's like we have a system of laws that is not written down at all, but is still enforced with eternal punishment. Like I said, uncomfortable.

 

[david_x]

Well, you made a judgment call on a moral matter. If morality (previously referred to as the Will of God) is to be taken seriously by people, isn't it bothersome that it's a matter of judgment, and that it can be violated quite accidentally through ignorance? It's like we have a system of laws that is not written down at all, but is still enforced with eternal punishment. Like I said, uncomfortable.

Why would it make you uncomfortable, you're not even part of the Church so you are outside it's jurisdiction.

 

[The Nihilist]

Why would it make you uncomfortable, you're not even part of the Church so you are outside it's jurisdiction.

Philosophy and theology were my areas of study in school, and seemingly screwy positions in either make me uncomfortable. It is like having a spider sense, but for philosophy nerds.

 

[david_x]

Philosophy and theology were my areas of study in school, and seemingly screwy positions in either make me uncomfortable. It is like having a spider sense, but for philosophy nerds.

Babbling again are we, make a point or something. This was like a red herring, and an appeal to authority or something...

 

[The Nihilist]

Babbling again are we, make a point or something. This was like a red herring, and an appeal to authority or something...

Don't worry about it.

 

[shinbits]

It is like having a spider sense, but for philosophy nerds.

haha. that should be on a t-shirt.