• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Bible exchange

KomissarSteve

Basileus
Feb 1, 2007
9,058
351
42
✟40,945.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
A group of atheists at the University of Texas have started up an exchange program similar to "Toys for Guns." Theirs is called "Smut for Smut" and promises to give out pornography in exchange for Bibles.

http://www.infoshop.org/inews/article.php?story=2005biblesmut
(The link is safe; no pictures or anything)

Anything immoral with this? It doesn't really seem to violate any of the commandments.

Anything unethical about it? It's an exchange of legal goods between two consenting parties. Really no different than trading in a minivan for a flashy convertible.

Clearly they're poking a little fun, and trying to raise a bit of a ruckus, but is there actually anything wrong with it?
It's tactless and it's not going to make anybody view atheists as anything more than intolerant jerks, but hey - if being marginalized doesn't bother them, then it sounds like a party to me.
 
Upvote 0

Skaloop

Agnostic atheist, pro-choice anti-abortion
May 10, 2006
16,332
899
49
Burnaby
Visit site
✟44,046.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-NDP
It's tactless and it's not going to make anybody view atheists as anything more than intolerant jerks, but hey - if being marginalized doesn't bother them, then it sounds like a party to me.

How exactly is it intolerant? I can agree with tactless, and I can agree with it not helping the general Christian opinion of atheists, but it's certainly not intolerant.
 
Upvote 0

KomissarSteve

Basileus
Feb 1, 2007
9,058
351
42
✟40,945.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
How exactly is it intolerant? I can agree with tactless, and I can agree with it not helping the general Christian opinion of atheists, but it's certainly not intolerant.
No, you're right; I didn't mean to imply that this, in particular, was an intolerant action. But the widespread perception among the 96% of the American population that isn't atheist is, nevertheless, that atheists are intolerant, and equating the Bible to porn isn't exactly going to help ameliorate this growing sense of alienation.
 
Upvote 0

Skaloop

Agnostic atheist, pro-choice anti-abortion
May 10, 2006
16,332
899
49
Burnaby
Visit site
✟44,046.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-NDP
No, you're right; I didn't mean to imply that this, in particular, was an intolerant action. But the widespread perception among the 96% of the American population that isn't atheist is, nevertheless, that atheists are intolerant, and equating the Bible to porn isn't exactly going to help ameliorate this growing sense of alienation.

Ah. Yeah, I can agree with that. Although we're not the ones getting arrested for protesting a Hindu prayer in the Senate, so we're not the only ones giving themselves an "intolerant" label.
 
Upvote 0

KomissarSteve

Basileus
Feb 1, 2007
9,058
351
42
✟40,945.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Ah. Yeah, I can agree with that. Although we're not the ones getting arrested for protesting a Hindu prayer in the Senate, so we're not the only ones giving themselves an "intolerant" label.
No, that's very true. But the way societal trends are going, as a completely neutral party in all of this, I can't help thinking that atheist activists would do well to exercise a little more caution and restraint in alienating themselves from the rest of the public. The way to change society and encourage, for example, a greater separation between church and state, certainly isn't to marginalize yourselves.
 
Upvote 0

Yggdrasil

Senior Member
Dec 23, 2005
580
14
38
✟869.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
Anyone who would exchange their Bible for porn has a really warped mind. Porn is grossly immoral. It is basically porn stars prostituting themselves. Not to mention the fact that pornography grossly warps the God given definition of sexuality.


To you. You see, everything is subjective.
 
Upvote 0