Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The thing is xianghua, you need to make an argument - simply asserting your opinion is, well, meh.no. in other words- again we see why we cant falsified evolution in any case. and this is also falsified the claim about nested hierarchy.
It's not exactly "evidence" for design in this imagined scenario because we would KNOW the "robot" had been designed.
Also, the 'robot' in this instance would obviously be made in imitation of something else (small organisms). That an imitation of something is "designed" doesn't mean the original was. If I make a replica of a boulder, that doesn't mean the original boulder was designed.
This has already been discussed on the thread. But again, I do not see why the fact of a self-replicating whatever suggests "intelligent design".But a bolder that replicates itself would suggest design.
you dont think that a system that is able to replicate a robot will be evidence for design?This has already been discussed on the thread. But again, I do not see why the fact of a self-replicating whatever suggests "intelligent design".
Could you ask this again and define what you mean by all the terms? There have been various things on this thread and I want to be sure to answer what you're really asking.you dont think that a system that is able to replicate a robot will be evidence for design?
lets say that we will find a speciel system that can replicate a robot. do you think that such a system is evidence for design or for a natural process?Could you ask this again and define what you mean by all the terms? There have been various things on this thread and I want to be sure to answer what you're really asking.
I'm sorry, I don't really know what you mean by a "special system." Also, what is the robot like? What kind of robot are we talking about?lets say that we will find a speciel system that can replicate a robot. do you think that such a system is evidence for design or for a natural process?
this is not what the paper says:
"Rates of innovation at feather regulatory elements exhibit an extended period of innovation with peaks in the ancestors of amniotes and archosaurs. We estimate that 86% of such regulatory elements and 100% of the nonkeratin feather gene set were present prior to the origin of Dinosauria"
no. in other words- again we see why we cant falsified evolution in any case. and this is also falsified the claim about nested hierarchy.
you dont think that a system that is able to replicate a robot will be evidence for design?
This has already been discussed on the thread. But again, I do not see why the fact of a self-replicating whatever suggests "intelligent design".
Your parents replicated. Was that stupid?
It shows signs of intelligence, genius.
I appreciate the point.
I'm sorry, I don't really know what you mean by a "special system." Also, what is the robot like? What kind of robot are we talking about?
How is it falsified?
No.you dont think that a system that is able to replicate a robot will be evidence for design?
Actually, that's a question for you to answer, since you are the ID proponent. If I designed and built an organic robot capable of reproducing and evolving, that robot would clearly be designed. Now, if I turned it loose on an uninhabited planet and over millennia thousands of other robot species evolved from it by random variation and selection and populated the planet, would you consider those robots to have been designed? Leave the question of evidence for the time being.a robot that made from organic components for instance.
How is a robot made from organic components different from a living organism?a robot that made from organic components for instance.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?