• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

mikeynov

Senior Veteran
Aug 28, 2004
1,990
127
✟2,746.00
Faith
Atheist

What you're asking for was already provided. Do you want a peer reviewed example of gene duplication?

If I provide it, will you retract your claim?
 
Upvote 0

Karl - Liberal Backslider

Senior Veteran
Jul 16, 2003
4,157
297
57
Chesterfield
Visit site
✟28,447.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Labour
SwampGator said:
Please explain how the two can coexist.

Please explain the logical connection between:

"Evolution happened"

and

"God does not exist."

Because there isn't one. If there isn't, then the two can coexist perfectly happily.
 
Upvote 0

Carico

Well-Known Member
Oct 12, 2003
5,968
158
74
Visit site
✟29,571.00
Faith
Christian
Freodin said:
You might be surprised - ants do give birth to offspring that can fly...

And how do you know that wouldn't be a separate species of ants? Has anyone ever seen two ants who didn't fly give birth to ants who did?

Again, this contradicts the whole reproductive process that offfspring are a product of the genes of their parents. It also does not explain how genes can be added to the DNA of a cell, especially ones that create the billions of neurons present in the human brain that are not present in the brains of primates.
 
Upvote 0

Oliver

Senior Member
Apr 5, 2002
639
23
52
Visit site
✟23,492.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
Knees said:
OK - give us a documented example of a beneficial mutation. While you're at it, why not explain why the text books that try to convince students that evolution is fact never present any such mutations (other than sickle-cell anemia).

So you're asking why the textbook never give any example apart from the one(s) they give?

I think part of the answer is that a textbook is not supposed to be an encyclopedia: one example of a specific part of the theory is usually enough, since there is very little time to study it.
 
Upvote 0

rmwilliamsll

avid reader
Mar 19, 2004
6,006
334
✟7,946.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Green
So again, how are these new genes added?

at least two methods you can read about:
gene duplication followed by mutations on the copies, best examples are variant forms of hemoglobin, these number in the hundreds.

second is ERV, obviously the interesting ones are HERV's
check out HERV-W, then HERV-K's

OK - give us a documented example of a beneficial mutation. While you're at it, why not explain why the text books that try to convince students that evolution is fact never present any such mutations (other than sickle-cell anemia).


There are at least two good examples on the molecular level for YECists to look at that show that this "no new information" or "only what is already present" is just not true.

What needs to be present is a piece of DNA.
Look at HERV-W, in particular, look at how a viral protein mediates trophoblast cell fusion in placentals. the source? a virus genome.

look at the nylon bug. the source of the novelty is a frameshift mutation.

the thallesimias(sp) of hemoglobin are the best place to look at a large number of mutations and how they work.

get down into the science, do some googling and reading, this no new information and no beneficial mutations is getting old because the science is there disproving it.


.....
 
Upvote 0

SwampGator

Active Member
Aug 1, 2004
202
19
64
USA USA
✟412.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Karl - Liberal Backslider said:
Please explain the logical connection between:

"Evolution happened"

and

"God does not exist."

Because there isn't one. If there isn't, then the two can coexist perfectly happily.

Your attempt at explanation has nothing to do with the question asked. How do put millions of years into the Bibles 7 day creation?
 
Upvote 0

Carico

Well-Known Member
Oct 12, 2003
5,968
158
74
Visit site
✟29,571.00
Faith
Christian
mikeynov said:
What you're asking for was already provided. Do you want a peer reviewed example of gene duplication?

If I provide it, will you retract your claim?

Gene duplication is not at all producing genes superior to itself. It is simply duplicating the original gene. So how would that show evolution?
 
Upvote 0

Oliver

Senior Member
Apr 5, 2002
639
23
52
Visit site
✟23,492.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
Carico said:
Gene duplication is not at all producing genes superior to itself. It is simply duplicating the original gene. So how would that show evolution?

Because the copy of the original gene can then be changed by other mutations into something different from the original gene.
 
Upvote 0

mikeynov

Senior Veteran
Aug 28, 2004
1,990
127
✟2,746.00
Faith
Atheist
Knees said:
OK - give us a documented example of a beneficial mutation. While you're at it, why not explain why the text books that try to convince students that evolution is fact never present any such mutations (other than sickle-cell anemia).

You'll have to give examples of these textbooks.

But I will say that the high school level of curricula isn't an appropriate place to discuss complex research, imho, unless it's an AP class or something.
 
Upvote 0

Karl - Liberal Backslider

Senior Veteran
Jul 16, 2003
4,157
297
57
Chesterfield
Visit site
✟28,447.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Labour
Carico said:
And how do you know that wouldn't be a separate species of ants? Has anyone ever seen two ants who didn't fly give birth to ants who did?

Happens every summer in virtually every ant colony. We're actually yanking your chain a bit here - how much do you know about ant reproduction?

Again, this contradicts the whole reproductive process that offfspring are a product of the genes of their parents.

No. A mutation or duplication or whatever happens in a germ cell of the parent, and the offspring that grows from that germ cell will have that feature - straight from the parental DNA.

It also does not explain how genes can be added to the DNA of a cell, especially ones that create the billions of neurons present in the human brain that are not present in the brains of primates.

I suspect that the same gene is responsible in both. The difference is in cranial capacity that allows us to have far more. There isn't a gene for each pair of legs on a millipede, for example, so there doesn't need to be a gene for each neuron.
 
Upvote 0

AnEmpiricalAgnostic

Agnostic by Fact, Atheist by Epiphany
May 25, 2005
2,740
186
51
South Florida
Visit site
✟26,987.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Knees said:
OK - give us a documented example of a beneficial mutation. While you're at it, why not explain why the text books that try to convince students that evolution is fact never present any such mutations (other than sickle-cell anemia).


SOURCE: http://www.gate.net/~rwms/EvoHumBenMutations.html
 
Upvote 0

Karl - Liberal Backslider

Senior Veteran
Jul 16, 2003
4,157
297
57
Chesterfield
Visit site
✟28,447.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Labour
Upvote 0
Aug 30, 2004
64
1
45
✟23,089.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Single
Carico said:
Gene duplication is not at all producing genes superior to itself. It is simply duplicating the original gene. So how would that show evolution?
NO GENE IS SUPERIOR TO ANOTHER GENE! All genes are made of the same four nucleotides. It is the proteins they code for that can be superior. Simply changing one nucleotide can make a proton superior or useless. Of course, as I've already said, "superior" depends on the environment.
 
Upvote 0

mikeynov

Senior Veteran
Aug 28, 2004
1,990
127
✟2,746.00
Faith
Atheist
Carico said:
Gene duplication is not at all producing genes superior to itself. It is simply duplicating the original gene. So how would that show evolution?

Evolution isn't about "going from less to more perfect."

Do you understand that? If you don't, no conversation about this subject is ever going to help, because you don't understand the basic evolutionary model.

This would be like me telling you "there's no evidence for Jesus, because England has no record of a Jesus living 500 years ago!" In other words, the entire assertion is framed on something nobody is claiming is true. So there's nothing to refute.

But the answer was already given - a duplicated gene can diverge to produce a new protein product. Do you also want examples of gene families that arose in this manner?

But honestly, I'm not sure that would help. Like I said before, you're asking to have a graduate+ level discussion with a pre-high school understanding of biology.
 
Upvote 0

mikeynov

Senior Veteran
Aug 28, 2004
1,990
127
✟2,746.00
Faith
Atheist

proton=protein
 
Upvote 0

Heather S.

Active Member
Jun 25, 2005
101
8
55
✟266.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
OK - give us a documented example of a beneficial mutation.
There are several in humans that have to do with cholesteral and some other issues that I can't remember off the top of my head (I'm no doctor). However there is a beneficial mutation in the algae C. taxifolia. It's a uni-cellular algae with a gene that mutated due to UV radiation. The mutation enabled the plant to survive in the cold waters of the Mediterranean, where it has been introduced. It is now causing a lot of harm to native plants. The new, mutated strand of C. taxifolia is much different from the harmless original.

A similar mutation has been seen in the Nothern snakehead, which has recently been introduced into US waters.

That's all I can remember without looking anything up. Do a Google search, for goodness sake.

Please explain how the two can coexist.
http://www.theisticevolution.org/


Heather
 
Upvote 0

Kripost

Senior Veteran
Mar 23, 2004
2,085
84
45
✟2,681.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single

The underlined section above is misleading.

Sickle-cell anemia is a recessive trait, meaning your need to have two genes inherited from both parents in order to have that trait. When a person has only one copy of that gene, the person does not only have sickle-cell anemia, but also resistant from malaria.

Also, you are underestimating how serious malaria is. Many children die from malaria before reaching puberty.
 
Upvote 0

Oliver

Senior Member
Apr 5, 2002
639
23
52
Visit site
✟23,492.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married

Didn't you mean something like "the person not only doesn't have sickle-cell anemia"? I mean if it is a recessive trait.. then again, English's not my mother tongue, so I may well have misunderstood this sentence...
 
Upvote 0