Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
There have been many uneducated saints, naturally, great men and women of God who have lived lives of great piety and love.
But the theologians of the East have been great men of learning as well, from Gregory of Nyssa to John Zizioulas.
I have never pointed out someone's bad grammar in the midst of a thread except on the one recent occasion when they got on my case for a typo.
Thekla said:There have been great theologians of all backgrounds and abilities.
(I do like the two you mentioned and many others.)
Thekla said:Then indeed you can understand that this thread, and some of the comments made here, might be painful for some
Thekla said:Recall Hebrews 5:2
I have communicated with people who spoke a dialect I was not familiar with, or who barely spoke English at all. The difference? All this communication was face to face. Non-verbal cues go a long way. (I have the same difficulty understanding when talking on the phone with someone whom I cannot see.) On a message board, grammar is the ONLY thing we can use to understand the other.
Can you name a single Eastern theologian- not mystic or general saint- who was not highly educated?
Learning is a painful process. If I correct someone on a mathematical error, that is something that points out something that they have done wrong, but it needs to be pointed out nonetheless.
As for Hebrews 5:2, in the first case, the weaknesses in question are sins. But supposing they are not, the passage says "He can deal gently with the ignorant and wayward." He deals with them gently, but he deals with them nonetheless.
At the age of 50 he decided to write a book about himself - A Pickle for the Knowing Ones or Plain Truth in a Homespun Dress. He wrote about himself and complained about politicians, clergy and his wife. The book contained 8,847 words and 33,864 letters, but absolutely no punctuation, and capital letters were sprinkled about at random. At first he handed his book out for free, but it rapidly became popular and ran into eight editions in total.[citation needed] When people complained that it was hard to read, for the second edition he added an extra page - 13 lines of punctuation marks - asking readers to "peper and solt it as they plese".
I think this thread is a good time to bring up Lord Timothy Dexter, particularly his book about himself:
This man is quite possibly one of the most awesome people in the universe.
This is not awesome:One day he began to wonder what people would say about him after he died. He proceeded to announce his death and to prepare for a burial. About 3,000 people appeared for the wake. However, Dexter's wife refused to cry for his passing, for which he later caned her, and so he decided not to appear to his guests at all. Timothy Dexter actually died in 1806.
Thekla said:" The theologian is the one who prays truly, and on who prays truly is a theologian." Evagrius Ponticus
Dark Lite
Yes, but surely he did not mean that one needed merely to pray truly, and that would make them a good theologian. He was saying that a theologian, in addition to other qualifications, must be a true man of prayer and not simply an academic.
Evagrius was himself, however, quite the academic. He was known for his schooling in rhetoric and logic, and was trained in classical studies.
Sometimes a ten dollar word actualy is better,... more precise, more concise... I'll try to hotlink 'em to an online Webster's when I can remember two. (I mean "to"I graduated with a 5th grade reading average myself and had taught myself to read much better later in life.
Now, I don't know where I am at right now with my grammer but my limited vocabulary is certainly not a secret around these parts, I want to say, "Say what"?
And yet I too get a bit rolley eyed when I need a dictionary as a mediator between myself and the person who is speaking to me.
Goes both ways I suppose.
Tis true.Nothing ruins your argument and credibility more than a poorly phrased post. If your post looks like a 2nd grader wrote it, it doesn't matter how good your argument is. I'm far, FAR less likely to take you seriously. So, because I'm a grammar freak and twitch and die a little every time somebody confuses your and you're, a basic grammar (and posting) lesson for all the denizens of GT:
There is the matter of theosis.
Persons of true spiritual depth are theologians, not the other way around; the simplest, illiterate person can iterate the "correct" theology in word and life.
Sometimes a ten dollar word actualy is better,... more precise, more concise... I'll try to hotlink 'em to an online Webster's when I can remember two. (I mean "to")
Can you post a few links to those? Thanksi seen people make threads complaining about the grammar before but between them all this is the most best one evers
Good thread .
It brings up *my* opinion of grammar freaks ... they are disingenuous . Language is for communication . If something can be understood as is , then the message performed it's created job . Context can help solve some ambiguous statements . Questions can help solve the rest . If one can correct a statement , then the message was received - no need for corrections . If one truly doesn't understand a statement , they would have no idea how to correct it . Correcting someone is merely an excuse to side-track a thread . It takes away any credibility of the one doing the correcting as they show that they are more interested having their way with the wording than the message of the post .
English is a blankety-blank ( fill in with your favorite negative term ) language - wierd rules and pronunciations and far too many exceptions to rules . And , it is constantly changing . Everyone who uses it must deal with that . Language was made as a tool for communication . And , a tool is not always used as recommended . The owner can use it for whatever use they desire . The English/British are great at manipulating the language for jokes and riddles . If grammar freaks would have their way , most humor would be banned .
Let us continue as we have been . The grammar freaks can ignore the English-usage commoners . And , the English-usage commoners can ignore the grammar freaks .
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?