Baiting Rule Discussion

[moicherie]

Woob the Borg would be proud of you.....btw so would the Pharisees they loved hunting rule breakers...

Good thing the job of 'The sinner hunter' is not up for grabs...

 

[sentipente]

So you could still have it as a baiting rule but make it clear that those baiting will not be free from receiving the same type of comments that they have used up to the point of actual flaming under CF rules.

That is why I say they bait at their peril. We are covered by the fact that this subForum is not subject to the ridiculous rules in force in the Main Forum and it is an automatic violation of the rules for anyone to make a report of a post in this forum based on an application of Main Forum rules. That should settle it without allowing that pesky camel to place his nose under our tent.

 

[sentipente]

Woob, we have the option of banishingt specific stupidity as we have described it from this subForum. In similar manner we can write a rule that bans you personally from the subForum. You can do what is right and recognize that you are not allowed to come in here and incite anyone or to report posts based on Main Forum rules.

 

[sentipente]

have it your way, you usually try to do just that, so have a good evening...

He will not have it his way. Under present Main Forum rules Every attempt to impose Main Forum rules in the Prog subForum is a violation of Main Forum rules.

 

[sentipente]

You're in too many people's faces.

And that is forum-wide harassment. Another violation of Forum rules.

 

[moicherie]

He will not have it his way. Under present Main Forum rules Every attempt to impose Main Forum rules in the Prog subForum is a violation of Main Forum rules.

the Adventist version of 1948.....

 

[StormyOne]

A couple of the rules from Atomorrow.com might be useful here:



In other words if someone comes to post in a hostile manner those in the discussion can respond with equal hostility. We might have to work on how to word it but I think there is an area between the personal attack of saying you are stupid which would be a flame and saying you are speaking in an ignorant way. That would not be a flame because it is an expression of what they have been saying. It is probably a more hostile response but in the instances we have been referring too it would be an equal response to the baiting.

So you could still have it as a baiting rule but make it clear that those baiting will not be free from receiving the same type of comments that they have used up to the point of actual flaming under CF rules.

I think I like that better..... can it be done here?

 

[Sophia7]

I think I like that better..... can it be done here?

It could. Whatever the consensus here decides is what we will do.

 

[freeindeed2]

As a member of this forum not only is it my right to report rule violations, it is my duty to do so.

At least you're admitting that making reports is your focus.

Mark my words, whenever I see a rule violation I will report it. If you don't like that, then you should ask yourself why you are really here.

I am here to discuss the true Gospel of Jesus Christ. Why are you here?