Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
International Politics
Backward countries
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mindlight" data-source="post: 72276408" data-attributes="member: 21246"><p>The regime in North Korea not only oppresses and impoverishes its own people but exports its toxicity outside. It also carries the risk of a nuclear war! If there is a way to remove this regime then it should be done for the sake of all. The kind of stability we see there is a kind of death.</p><p></p><p>I agree Assad is probably the best of a bad bunch in Syria. But historically his regime has also exported support for terrorism in Lebanon. Also there is the thorny question of the Kurds there. They fought against the pure evil of ISIS but now both the Turks and Syrians want to destroy them. This is a people who deserve their own state but it would require Western intervention to secure that.</p><p></p><p>You seem to favour strong man regimes over the chaos that follows their removal but Gadaffi in Libya killed British citizens at Lockerbie and supported IRA terrorism and so his removal is not that problematic to me.</p><p></p><p>Organised state actors can be far more internationally toxic than the civil wars that follow them. Far more died at Sadams hand than in the chaos following that.</p><p></p><p>But you are right some cultures just fail. Haiti is a good example. But exporting its voodoo priests elsewhere might be just as problematic. A good dose of imperialism and a systematic purge of occultic activities would probably be more effective but such a solution is unthinkable in todays West.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mindlight, post: 72276408, member: 21246"] The regime in North Korea not only oppresses and impoverishes its own people but exports its toxicity outside. It also carries the risk of a nuclear war! If there is a way to remove this regime then it should be done for the sake of all. The kind of stability we see there is a kind of death. I agree Assad is probably the best of a bad bunch in Syria. But historically his regime has also exported support for terrorism in Lebanon. Also there is the thorny question of the Kurds there. They fought against the pure evil of ISIS but now both the Turks and Syrians want to destroy them. This is a people who deserve their own state but it would require Western intervention to secure that. You seem to favour strong man regimes over the chaos that follows their removal but Gadaffi in Libya killed British citizens at Lockerbie and supported IRA terrorism and so his removal is not that problematic to me. Organised state actors can be far more internationally toxic than the civil wars that follow them. Far more died at Sadams hand than in the chaos following that. But you are right some cultures just fail. Haiti is a good example. But exporting its voodoo priests elsewhere might be just as problematic. A good dose of imperialism and a systematic purge of occultic activities would probably be more effective but such a solution is unthinkable in todays West. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
International Politics
Backward countries
Top
Bottom