• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

  • The rule regarding AI content has been updated. The rule now rules as follows:

    Be sure to credit AI when copying and pasting AI sources. Link to the site of the AI search, just like linking to an article.

Authority

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hoonbaba

Catholic Preterist
Apr 15, 2002
1,941
55
45
New Jersey, USA
Visit site
✟25,659.00
Faith
Catholic
Here's another question:  Since the Church claims to be infallible in faith and morals, what happens if a pope or a group of bishops and the pope decided to preach some sort of heresy?

I was discussing authority with a friend of mine and he asked me that question.  I was wondering if anyone can addresss this.

-Jason
 

KC Catholic

Everybody's gone surfin'...Surfin' U.S.A
Feb 5, 2002
4,010
76
58
Overland Park, KS
✟29,387.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Today at 02:43 PM Hoonbaba said this in Post #1

Here's another question:  Since the Church claims to be infallible in faith and morals, what happens if a pope or a group of bishops and the pope decided to preach some sort of heresy?

I was discussing authority with a friend of mine and he asked me that question.  I was wondering if anyone can addresss this.

-Jason


The Church has Jesus' explicit promise that "the gates of Hell would not prevail against the Church." This would include false teachings or heresies - the Holy Spirit won't allow it - never has.

The few bad Popes we've had never, ever taught anything. Why? They were too busy being bad to teach anything that could possible have been in err or heresy.
 
Upvote 0

Hoonbaba

Catholic Preterist
Apr 15, 2002
1,941
55
45
New Jersey, USA
Visit site
✟25,659.00
Faith
Catholic
Today at 03:50 PM KC Catholic said this in Post #2




The Church has Jesus' explicit promise that "the gates of Hell would not prevail against the Church." This would include false teachings or heresies - the Holy Spirit won't allow it - never has.

The few bad Popes we've had never, ever taught anything. Why? They were too busy being bad to teach anything that could possible have been in err or heresy.


Whoa...I completely forgot about Matthew 16:18 =P

But what if a corrupt bishop decided to preach heresy?  Then what?

-Jason
 
Upvote 0

Hoonbaba

Catholic Preterist
Apr 15, 2002
1,941
55
45
New Jersey, USA
Visit site
✟25,659.00
Faith
Catholic
Today at 04:01 PM fragmentsofdreams said this in Post #4

I don't know what the procedures are, but there have been heretical bishops many times in history, notably the Arian heresy.


If there have been heretical bishops, then doesn't that tear apart the whole infallibility argument?

-Jason
 
Upvote 0

isshinwhat

Pro Deo et Patria
Apr 12, 2002
8,338
624
Visit site
✟13,555.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
It means that the Church as a whole will not teach heresy. One of the Bishop's duties is to teach what the Church teaches. A heretic, by definition, does not do that. The inerrancy of the Magesterium refers only to Papal pronouncements, Conciliar declarations, and the original deposit of the Faith.

God Bless,

Neal
 
Upvote 0

seebs

God Made Me A Skeptic
Apr 9, 2002
31,917
1,530
20
Saint Paul, MN
Visit site
✟70,235.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Today at 02:50 PM KC Catholic said this in Post #2
The Church has Jesus' explicit promise that "the gates of Hell would not prevail against the Church." This would include false teachings or heresies - the Holy Spirit won't allow it - never has.

I've never quite understood this. How does a false teaching qualify as the gates of Hell prevailing? I mean, aren't they still short a few tens of billions of souls due to the Church's constant meddling? Don't people still hear the Gospel? Sounds like the Gates of Hell are losing pretty badly here.
 
Upvote 0

VOW

Moderator
Feb 7, 2002
6,912
15
73
*displaced* CA, soon to be AZ!
Visit site
✟43,000.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
If a bishop gets a wild idea and decides to teach something aside from what the Church teaches, then the Church will call said bishop on the carpet, and he will be removed from a position of authority.

Same with a priest.

Do a quick study on the papal history. One pope, can't remember his name right off the bat (hey Wollllllllllllllllls!), did some wheeling and dealing to attain the Papal seat. After his appointment, he was supposed to push through the agenda of the folks who enabled him to rise to power.

He did a 180°.

He reaffirmed the teachings of the Church, to the disappointment of his powerful friends.

The Church IS protected by the Holy Spirit.


Peace be with you,
~VOW
 
Upvote 0

artnalex

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2003
1,209
65
55
California
Visit site
✟24,206.00
Faith
Catholic
VOW said:
After his appointment, he was supposed to push through the agenda of the folks who enabled him to rise to power.

He did a 180°.

He reaffirmed the teachings of the Church, to the disappointment of his powerful friends.

The Church IS protected by the Holy Spirit.

Exactly!

In fact, we have had several bad popes (as a fallible man, not as a teacher of Church doctrine), but none, I say NONE, have ever gone against the teachings of the Church - nor have any ever declared any heretical dogmas. For 2000 years now we have been guarded by the Holy Spirit.

Which is exactly why SOLA SCRIPTURA is undeniably against what Jesus taught. If we were to believe in SOLA SCRIPTURA then we would never be able to agree on anything, and God's WORD would be whatever each individual thought it to be. We would have 15yr old kids proclaiming their interpretations as "correct" and no Protestant could deny him, because they could not point to their own authority to do so - since they do not believe in one.
 
Upvote 0

Hoonbaba

Catholic Preterist
Apr 15, 2002
1,941
55
45
New Jersey, USA
Visit site
✟25,659.00
Faith
Catholic
Hi guys,

I think someone mentioned how the Holy Spirit prevented a bad pope from preaching heresy.  I remember reading it in Born Fundamental, Born Again Catholic, so I figured I might as well type it up and share it =) 

 
As I quite obvious from even this short list of bishops, the only sure way for the Christian to know that his doctrine was orthodox was to remain in agreement with the See of Rome.  Take the years 512 to 518 as an example.  Every bishopric succession except Rome had been overtaken by heresy.  Why?  Jesus made a promise to Peter, and he can be counted to keep it.

There are many interesting historical illustration of this protection to the Church provided by Christ through his Spirit.  Once again, we must keep in mind that we are merely looking for confirmation, not proof.  God has always protected the bishop of Rome from heresy, but somtimes it has been in spite of the actual man in office, and sometimes the margin of safety has been very slim.  In many cases, the protection of God seems to be the only possibl explanation.  For moy money, the most interesting story is that of Vigilius in the sixth century.

Theodora was the empress of the realm, ruling from Constantinople.  She was a Monophysite, an adherent of a heresy that declared Jesus has only one nature, the divine.  This heresy denies the human nature of Jesus, which Catholics and modern-day Evangelicals teach.  Theodora determined to improse her thinking on the Pope, to bring him into line with the bishops of the East.  Pope Agapitus, however, would not budge.  While in Constantinople to remove a heretical Eastern bishop, he died.  It seems likely that he was poisoned.

Vigilius, who very much wanted to be pope himself, was an assistant to Pope Agapitus.  He met in secret with the empress and struck a deal with her.  He agreed to enforce her heretical views regarding theology if she would force the Church to accept him as pope.  After he was installed as pope, he would restore the bishop who had just been deposed by Pope Agapitus, even though that bishop had been dismissed as a Monophysite heretic. (It is extremely interesting that neither empress, emperor, Church, nor bishop questioned the authority of a pope to dismiss an Eastern bishop, as Agapitus had just done.  They might poison the man, but they still did not dare to question the authority of the papal office.)

Before Vigilius could get back to Rome, however, Silverius was elected and installed pope after Agapitus, Silverius stood just as firm for orthodoxy as had Agapitus.  He was subsequently accused (falsely) of treason and unlawfully stripped of his office by a secular general of Theodora's.  Vigilius was present at the confrontation.  Silverius would not resign, so he was banished to exile.

Vigilius took Silverius' place as though he were pope, although he could not be pope until the office was vacant.  Vigilius was, in fact, an antipope.  In spite of this, he promptly started to fulfill his promise, writing letters promoting the heresy of Monophysitism.  The obvious problem he had, however, was that he could not be pope until Silverius was dead or had resigned.  Vigilius seems to have made certain Pope Silverius did die, of starvation, about fifteen months after he had helped to exile him.

Reluctantly, the Church of Rome installed Vigilius as pope.  To do anything else would have meant death or exile to those involved.  Theodora waited for her new pope to reinstate her hertical bishop and to preach her heresy.  He had done just such preaching as antipope only a few short months before.  Now that he was recognized as pope, her plans could come to fruition.

But God the Holy Spirit was working a most amazing change in Vigilius.  Whereas, as antipope, he had been enthusiastically defending Monophysite heresy, he now wrote the empress a letter stating that he could never teach Monophysitism or support those who did, now that he was pope.  Vigilius then refused to approve a compromise solution advanced by the emperor himself.  He must have known what this could mean to him.  Vigilius had participated in the murder of at least one pope over just this type of refusal to compromise with heresy.  His moral character had been anything but exemplary up to this point.  He was guilty of both simony and murder, yet God forgave him and provided him the grace to endure his own martyrdom.  While saying Mass in Rome, Vigilius was arrested by the emperor's men and deported to Constantinople.  He never saw Rome again before his death, ten exceedingly difficult years later.  At no point after becoming pope, however, did Vigilius teach the heresy embraced by the empress and most of the Eastern Church.  Jesus had kept his promise.  The gates of hell skulked away empty handed- the trophy had eluded it again. (Born Fundamental, Born Again Catholic, p. 94-96)
 

God bless!

-Jason


 
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.