• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

  • The rule regarding AI content has been updated. The rule now rules as follows:

    Be sure to credit AI when copying and pasting AI sources. Link to the site of the AI search, just like linking to an article.

Attractor field theory

Achichem

Faithful
Aug 9, 2003
1,349
58
✟1,857.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Libertarian
Maxwell511 said:
But if Bill Gates puts his money in the Bank then it used to create more wealth through loans for new businesses. Is this truely static wealth?
oh you don't even want me to get started on banks :mad:

But without getting into that, most of his "net-worth" is not in the banking system, it is sitting around in static forms. (e.g. a yacht, 9+ houses, plane) sometimes vicariously, for example shares in a company who is predominately underused goods.

Now I'm not against static resources, there nothing wrong with having a highway car and a city car, or owning an extra condo on the mountain. I think those are great. The problem is its affect on lower attractors[impoverished].

I don't think giving that extra car or condo to a lower field is necessary a good thing either, but do understand they would use it more[hence the term static]. The key is to raise their levels as to not have a lower field to be negatively effected by the fruits of prosperity.
 
Upvote 0

Maxwell511

Contributor
Jun 12, 2005
6,073
260
42
Utah County
✟31,130.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
DaTsar said:
oh you don't even want me to get started on banks :mad:

But without getting into that, most of his "net-worth" is not in the banking system, it is sitting around in static forms. (e.g. a yacht, 9+ houses, plane) sometimes vicariously, for example shares in a company who is predominately underused goods.

Now I'm not against static resources, there nothing wrong with having a highway car and a city car, or owning an extra condo on the mountain. I think those are great. The problem is its affect on lower attractors[impoverished].

I don't think giving that extra car or condo to a lower field is necessary a good thing either, but do understand they would use it more[hence the term static]. The key is to raise their levels as to not have a lower field to be negatively effected by the fruits of prosperity.

I see. Do you have a mechanism/formula that would determine the changes in "charges". Is this mechanism independent of the external field?

Also have you also considered using different charge types positive/negative to represent the differences in static and dynamic wealth?
 
Upvote 0