Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Attempting to redefine the judicial system.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RocksInMyHead" data-source="post: 73235083" data-attributes="member: 284142"><p>You'd have a point if Garland had been voted upon by the full Senate, but his nomination was held up in committee. The decision to not consider Garland was formally made by the 11 Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee - Senators Grassley, Hatch, Lee, Sessions, Graham, Cornyn, Cruz, Flake, Perdue, Vitter, and Tillis. They did not give the full Senate the opportunity to express the wishes of its constituents, and it could be argued that they did not all accurately express the wishes of their own constituents either. Of the 11, Vitter chose not to seek re-election in 2016, Flake and Hatch have announced that they will not be running for re-election, Sessions is the Attorney General, and Cruz's position in the 2018 election is looking very tenuous.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RocksInMyHead, post: 73235083, member: 284142"] You'd have a point if Garland had been voted upon by the full Senate, but his nomination was held up in committee. The decision to not consider Garland was formally made by the 11 Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee - Senators Grassley, Hatch, Lee, Sessions, Graham, Cornyn, Cruz, Flake, Perdue, Vitter, and Tillis. They did not give the full Senate the opportunity to express the wishes of its constituents, and it could be argued that they did not all accurately express the wishes of their own constituents either. Of the 11, Vitter chose not to seek re-election in 2016, Flake and Hatch have announced that they will not be running for re-election, Sessions is the Attorney General, and Cruz's position in the 2018 election is looking very tenuous. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Attempting to redefine the judicial system.
Top
Bottom