• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Atheistic Darwinist Creationism and It's Just a Sack of Chemicals

Status
Not open for further replies.

JasonClark

Well-Known Member
May 24, 2015
450
48
✟840.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
And yet you want to come here and engage an American Christian in debate?
Why?
Because I probably know as much about the bible as you do, if I don't I will simply make up something.
Arguing about religion is all about interpretation, you simply read it to get out of it whatever you want, where it says up you read it to say down,
when someone disagrees quote a random verse and say it proves your point.
 
Upvote 0

TheBarrd

Teller of tales, writer of poems, singer of songs
Mar 1, 2015
4,955
1,746
Following a Jewish Carpenter
✟14,094.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status


Awww...ain't they a cute little family.
 
Upvote 0

TheBarrd

Teller of tales, writer of poems, singer of songs
Mar 1, 2015
4,955
1,746
Following a Jewish Carpenter
✟14,094.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status

As it happens you have tripped over a Christian who has read the Bible through...cover to cover.
And I don't "argue about religion". I told you, I'm not here to convert you or to change your mind. You came here, I didn't go to your "hangout" to mess with you. If anyone here is trying to "argue about religion", it's you.
Now, I don't know what might have caused you to feel so hostile toward Christians, but whatever it was, I am sorry for it.
However, I don't think it would be wise for me to continue to interact with you. My patience, unfortunately, has limits...
I do hope that you find peace one day. Till then, may God bless you...whether you believe in Him or not.
 
Upvote 0

TheBarrd

Teller of tales, writer of poems, singer of songs
Mar 1, 2015
4,955
1,746
Following a Jewish Carpenter
✟14,094.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status


I will pray for you.
 
Upvote 0

TheBarrd

Teller of tales, writer of poems, singer of songs
Mar 1, 2015
4,955
1,746
Following a Jewish Carpenter
✟14,094.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
IMO, many debate their faith to secure and protect their belief to themselves and it has nothing to do with trying to convince someone who is a non believer they are wrong.
I'll say this...speaking with atheists has made me examine my faith, and why I believe what I believe.
And my faith grew and became stronger for it.
I learned that faith that can't be tested can't be trusted.
 
Reactions: AV1611VET
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,785
52,545
Guam
✟5,137,753.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I'll say this...speaking with atheists has made me examine my faith, and why I believe what I believe.
And my faith grew and became stronger for it.
AMEN to that![VERSE=Proverbs 27:17,KJV]Iron sharpeneth iron; so a man sharpeneth the countenance of his friend.[/VERSE]
 
Reactions: TheBarrd
Upvote 0

gladiatrix

Card-carrying EAC member
Sep 10, 2002
1,676
371
Florida
Visit site
✟28,397.00
Faith
Atheist

1. Where's your EVIDENCE that they did any such thing? Oh yes, a DECEITFULLY edited video from some lying anti-choicers.

2. As far as I know "killing babies" is against the law and abortion is not "killing babies" (nothing but inflammatory anti-choicer rhetoric) and HERE are my arguments on why there no baby there to be killed (an old post, needs to have some links updated, but enough there still).

  • According to some Christians even babies are born sinners deserving of death, but when it comes to abortion, they are suddenly "innocent" and must be "protected" at all costs.

  • One has just gotta love the bare-faced, self-serving CONTRADICTION above as we are treated to buckets of crocodile tears wept by forced-birthers who's real aim is to use the pregnancy as a weapon to stomp down/control the woman who's had the TEMERITY to have sex that they, these self-appointed Paladins of UBER-Righteousness™, don't approve of ( most anti-choicers really "pro-punishment", absolutely NOTHING to do with any genuine concern for "life" and all one has to do is go HERE to watch the counter clock up deaths from hunger, 75%-85% of the children, why bring MORE into the world when we fail to care for those already here?). More examples of why I think so:
  • But then using the correct medical terminolgy doesn't quite stir the emotions now does it (can't have people actually using their reason, can we?) That's why we see the terms "pro-deather", "abortuary", "baby butcher", etc.

  • I guess that is why Joe Scheidler, Randall Terry and other leaders of the anti-choicer movement are so into the Use of Inflammatory Rhetoric (Chap. 47-Closed! 99 Ways to Stop Abortion).

  • Then this lot has the profound hypocrisy to try and claim they "don't advocate violence" when that sort of language breeds nothing but violence. The kind of "dialogue" recommended by Scheidler et al is NOT accurate.

  • For instance, claiming that calling a embryo/fetus a "baby" is accurate does not make it so...but then using CORRECT medical terminology doesn't carry the "emotional/shock" value both you, Scheidler and Co. want to use. Shouting at people "fetus murderer" or "embryo-butcher" doesn't quite cut it in the the "shock" department quite as well as shouting "baby murderer", "baby-butcher" or "baby-killer" or "pro-deather".

  • What is a real hoot is that Scheidler et al say don't use phrases like phrases lik "baby-butcher" TOO MUCH (why at all?) not because they are inflammatory (Scheidler et al recommend that), but because if used TOO OFTEN, it minimizes their "impact"(all he says to me is "we don't want to be exposed for the fanatics we really are too soon, so cool it unless you think you can get away with it")

  • This sort of language does nothing but incite violence (it's true intent) which is why I find Scheidler and Co. to hypocrites of the first water when they goad their followers to use such language and then try to say "but we really don't recommend violence"....hypocrisy, MUCH!


3. And before you start bleating about my "rhetoric", all I can say is that your side of the fence loves to dish it out, but never can take it (how do you like this "dose of your own medicine"?)
 
Last edited:
Reactions: bhsmte
Upvote 0

justlookinla

Regular Member
Mar 31, 2014
11,767
199
✟35,675.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Which is why man has manufactured Gods for as long as man could come up with the idea, because we have evolved to derive some psychological benefit from thinking we have a higher understanding of things.

You certainly have a right to your faith-based opinion.


There is a correlation between the perception of not needing God and forgetting God.

With this said, it doesn't mean certain faith beliefs can not be beneficial to some, because they can be. It just so happens, depending on one's individual psychological makeup, not everyone requires one to be able to live a good life.

Would you like to relate your antiChrist beliefs to the topic of the form, creation and evolution?
 
Upvote 0

justlookinla

Regular Member
Mar 31, 2014
11,767
199
✟35,675.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Since you seem to be dodging the question, let's pop the stack...

Where is the contradiction between being an evolved sack of chemicals and being made in the image of God are not contradictory statements.

I haven't dodged your question, I've answered it repeatedly, I don't understand your latest question though. Maybe you're asking about the incompatibility of being a evolved sack of chemicals of the Darwinist evolution model as contrasted to God creating humanity? The basic contradiction is one of humanity being just another relatively meaningless/worthless life form verses humanity having inherent value beyond simply a Darwinist life form of little value. In one creationist worldview, the sack of chemicals identified as human is a construct of random, mindless, meaningless, purposeless and goalless constructs (Darwinism), in the other, humanity was planned and designed and the highest order of life in all life we observe today.
 
Upvote 0

TheBarrd

Teller of tales, writer of poems, singer of songs
Mar 1, 2015
4,955
1,746
Following a Jewish Carpenter
✟14,094.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status

Have you ever had an abortion?

No offense, I'm just curious, here...
 
Upvote 0

gladiatrix

Card-carrying EAC member
Sep 10, 2002
1,676
371
Florida
Visit site
✟28,397.00
Faith
Atheist
Have you ever had an abortion?

No offense, I'm just curious, here...
No offense taken...the answer to your question is no. I've never had the misfortune to be in such a situation (unlike a huge number of women around the world who might).
 
Upvote 0

gladiatrix

Card-carrying EAC member
Sep 10, 2002
1,676
371
Florida
Visit site
✟28,397.00
Faith
Atheist

1) How unfortunate for your assumption of superior knowledge that this Pew Survey actually showed that it's ATHEISTS who know more about religion and the Bible:
Atheists and agnostics, Jews and Mormons are among the highest-scoring groups on a new survey of religious knowledge, outperforming evangelical Protestants, mainline Protestants and Catholics on questions about the core teachings, history and leading figures of major world religions.

On average, Americans correctly answer 16 of the 32 religious knowledge questions on the survey by the Pew Research Center’s Forum on Religion & Public Life. Atheists and agnostics average 20.9 correct answers. Jews and Mormons do about as well, averaging 20.5 and 20.3 correct answers, respectively. Protestants as a whole average 16 correct answers; Catholics as a whole, 14.7. Atheists and agnostics, Jews and Mormons perform better than other groups on the survey even after controlling for differing levels of education.

2) What always amuses me to no end is the overwheening ARROGANCE exhibited by some Christians, strutting and preening in their assumption that atheists haven't read the Bible and that's why they're atheists....nothing could be further from the truth.

3) I can say that reading the so-called "good Book" (fully agree with Dawkin's assessment of the God for the reasons HERE and HERE) deconverted me completely (predict now that at least one self-important Christian will swoop in to declare that I was never a Christian in the first place)

4) In addition HERE'S a post containing links to other posts pointing out why I've come to the conclusion that the Bible, like other self-proclaimed "holy books", is nothing but a self-serving fiction.

5) IOW, like all stories about alleged supernatural entities, when God-s? are "speaking" it's only HUMAN lips observed moving, God-s? being such great "Excusers" for any crime these HUMANS might want to be "absolved" from committing, e.g., enslaving other human beings or persecuting/murdering/marginalizing other Christians/non-believers (so conveniently "handy" if these "heathens" are in possession of something coveted by them, that their God/s? hate the same people they do)

6) Why argue with Christians?
A. Simple, it's time atheists refused to "sit down and shut up" and started refuting the garbage spread about them by self-entitled theists (as the "majority" don't ya' know"), as well as opposing the efforts of these same theists to impose their POV on everyone else.

B. Believers are heavily indoctrinated to both to hate and distrust non-believers (especially if that non-believer's an atheist), something that has absolutely no basis in fact as seen in this study by Gervais showing such attitudes by the "faithful" are completely WITHOUT warrant here in this post and here in the vile treatment of Jessica Alhquist by self-entitled Christians.

C. What's really ironic here is that this smug, self-satisfied-in-their-righteousness lot who are actually often the "People of the Lie" as described HERE in Post #49 by Dr. Peck, not atheists as some less than honest posters might have us believe.

D. Atheism is simply a lack of belief in God(s?) and there's no morality/worldview (definition here) that goes with this lack of belief.

E. Post #71, 03-20-15, 10:10 PM explains why religion (whatever one wants to call this appeal to an alleged supernatural realm/agent) was and is nothing more that a means to gain control power/control over others by making them fear/obey the hawkers of such claims, nothing but a human variant them just "banging" their version Mike the Chimp's kerosene cans , a deceitful ploy used by this low-ranking chimp male to gain control of the troop as the alpha male, illustrating to me that religion "evolved" as a means of power/control (why belly-crawling in God-fear is NOT a reliable guarantor of moral behavior)
  • The scientific evidence shows that morals/altruism is just a survival strategy, no Deity(-ies?) need apply, as outlined below (even bacteria use it!):

    a. Post #205 (Part 1), 03-21-15, 02:00 PM

    b. Post #206 (Part 2), 03-21-15, 02:01 PM

    c. The Sin-Seller Spiel: ==>Here's why it's just "conning the mugs"
    (acquire power/control over the target, make the sin-sellers feel secure/safe in a world where everyone believes what they do)


  • I can see why the Christians often refer to themselves as "God-fearing" ==> if one actually believes the image and stories in the Bible, IMO there would indeed be a lot to fear as outlined HERE in Post #81.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

TheBarrd

Teller of tales, writer of poems, singer of songs
Mar 1, 2015
4,955
1,746
Following a Jewish Carpenter
✟14,094.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status

I never assume that someone has not read the Bible.
However, the post you answered was actually addressed to someone else who had told me that he hadn't read the Bible.
Do keep up.

[QUOTE="gladiatrix, post: 68316659, member: 4302"3) I can say that reading the so-called "good Book" (fully agree with Dawkin's assessment of the God for the reasons HERE and HERE) deconverted me completely (predict now that at least one self-important Christian will swoop in to declare that I was never a Christian in the first place)
4) In addition HERE'S a post containing links to other posts pointing out why I've come to the conclusion that the Bible, like other self-proclaimed "holy books", is nothing but a self-serving fiction[/QUOTE]
Don't let me spoil your fun. You are welcome to believe whatever you like. I'm not here to try to convert anyone.

[QUOTE="gladiatrix, post: 68316659, member: 4302"5) IOW, like all stories about alleged supernatural entities, when God-s? are "speaking" it's only HUMAN lips observed moving, God-s? being such great "Excusers" for any crime these HUMANS might want to be "absolved" from committing, e.g., enslaving other human beings or persecuting/murdering/marginalizing other Christians/non-believers (so conveniently "handy" if these "heathens" are in possession of something coveted by them, that their God/s? hate the same people they do)[/QUOTE]

I hope you didn't pay too much to get into that performance.

[QUOTE="gladiatrix, post: 68316659, member: 4302"6) Why argue with Christians?
A. Simple, it's time atheists refused to "sit down and shut up" and started refuting the garbage spread about them by self-entitled theists (as the "majority" don't ya' know"), as well as opposing the efforts of these same theists to impose their POV on everyone else.

B. Believers are heavily indoctrinated to both to hate and distrust non-believers (especially if that non-believer's an atheist), something that has absolutely no basis in fact as seen in this study by Gervais showing such attitudes by the "faithful" are completely WITHOUT warrant here in this post and here in the vile treatment of Jessica Alhquist by self-entitled Christians.

C. What's really ironic here is that this smug, self-satisfied-in-their-righteousness lot who are actually often the "People of the Lie" as described HERE in Post #49 by Dr. Peck, not atheists as some less than honest posters might have us believe.

D. Atheism is simply a lack of belief in God(s?) and there's no morality/worldview (definition here) that goes with this lack of belief.

E. Post #71, 03-20-15, 10:10 PM explains why religion (whatever one wants to call this appeal to an alleged supernatural realm/agent) was and is nothing more that a means to gain control power/control over others by making them fear/obey the hawkers of such claims, nothing but a human variant them just "banging" their version Mike the Chimp's kerosene cans , a deceitful ploy used by this low-ranking chimp male to gain control of the troop as the alpha male, illustrating to me that religion "evolved" as a means of power/control (why belly-crawling in God-fear is NOT a reliable guarantor of moral behavior)
  • The scientific evidence shows that morals/altruism is just a survival strategy, no Deity(-ies?) need apply, as outlined below (even bacteria use it!):

    a. Post #205 (Part 1), 03-21-15, 02:00 PM

    b. Post #206 (Part 2), 03-21-15, 02:01 PM

    c. The Sin-Seller Spiel: ==>Here's why it's just "conning the mugs"
    (acquire power/control over the target, make the sin-sellers feel secure/safe in a world where everyone believes what they do)​
  • I can see why the Christians often refer to themselves as "God-fearing" ==> if one actually believes the image and stories in the Bible, IMO there would indeed be a lot to fear as outlined HERE in Post #81.[/QUOTE]
You seem to be a tad angry. I wonder why?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

JasonClark

Well-Known Member
May 24, 2015
450
48
✟840.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
I'll say this...speaking with atheists has made me examine my faith, and why I believe what I believe.
And my faith grew and became stronger for it.
I learned that faith that can't be tested can't be trusted.
That's because you live in a world of make believe.
 
Upvote 0

Archaeopteryx

Wanderer
Jul 1, 2007
22,229
2,608
✟78,240.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
This is important: you are lamenting the erosion of religious privilege, not religious liberty. If anything, religious liberty is greater now than it ever was in the past: you are can go to a church that does same-sex weddings or to a church that doesn't. You can pray to whatever god you want to, in any school, and you aren't forced to participate in anyone else's prayers.
 
Upvote 0

Archaeopteryx

Wanderer
Jul 1, 2007
22,229
2,608
✟78,240.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Since we have data that indicates the opposite, this statement is either ignorant or deceitful.
 
Upvote 0

Archaeopteryx

Wanderer
Jul 1, 2007
22,229
2,608
✟78,240.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Believers are always so confident that their god is the "One True God" and that all the others are just "lookalikes" or cheap imitations. Yet the adherents of these "lookalikes" believe just as strongly as those who insist that theirs is the genuine article.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.