- Jul 8, 2019
- 3,657
- 893
- 56
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Married
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
ok.You are attempting to support the claim "theists here are telling me knowing the truth is a bad thing." Neither of these quotes support your claim at all.
They must either believe we are lying or that the bible is untrue. Which one do you think they will pick most of the time.Can your god convince me to not refuse? Apparently not.
And don't impugn my character. I don't refuse evidence.
Indeed. This sort of thinking is what leads to pogroms and crusades. We are obviously perverse, denying the obvious. Clearly such a scourge must be eliminated. And theists wonder why atheists might occasionally bend towards anti-theism.They must either believe we are lying or that the bible is untrue. Which one do you think they will pick most of the time.
Then that makes sense, thanks. So sounds like a lot of Christians will come to intellectually believe in the general concept of God as just an understandable consequence of them believing in Christianity. Then it’s also understandable if their general belief in God goes out the window as a package deal if their belief in Christianity goes out the window. That makes sense and it sounds like that was your case, I couldn’t tell at first that’s why I asked. So then after the fact you got into logic, and the general arguments for God were just not convincing for you.I was convinced that the Christian god was the only god, so I believed god existed and in Christianity at the same time. And yes, I believe that the arguments for a god and the christian god are unconvincing when studied.
Learned a new word "pogrom". Thanks. I agree, they think we can choose what we believe. I cannot think of one thing I believe to be true that I could force myself to believe otherwise.Indeed. This sort of thinking is what leads to pogroms and crusades. We are obviously perverse, denying the obvious. Clearly such a scourge must be eliminated. And theists wonder why atheists might occasionally bend towards anti-theism.
I don't really remember the exact sequence of events when I got out of belief. I probably was a deist for a short time but once things start going it snowballs into atheism pretty fast. At least for me. It took a couple of months once I started to doubt.Then that makes sense, thanks. So sounds like a lot of Christians will come to intellectually believe in the general concept of God as just an understandable consequence of them believing in Christianity. Then it’s also understandable if their general belief in God goes out the window as a package deal if their belief in Christianity goes out the window. That makes sense and it sounds like that was your case, I couldn’t tell at first that’s why I asked. So then after the fact you got into logic, and the general arguments for God were just not convincing for you.
Maybe, my experience was basically learning epistemology, skepticism and logic. With those tools it was clear that my belief was on bad reasoning. God could exist, there is just not sufficient reasons to believe it does.Basically I find it interesting to see which former Christians retain their intellectual belief in the general existence of God (in a sort of Einstein type God of the universe) THAT they attained by listening to apologists, and which former Christians throw BOTH beliefs away after they lose their belief in Christianity due to a crisis of faith that has nothing to do with existence of God arguments. I’m currently of the opinion that most former Christians over shoot and throw away both beliefs as an angry protest reaction against Christianity. Most former Christians don’t even dive into logic after they throw away their faith, they just walk away and go about their life. So for example, it would not be logical if someone found the Teleological Argument to be extremely convincing for God’s existence, but then they become an atheist because the problem of evil ripped them out of Christianity. It would be more logical for them to be a deist. But I definitely run into former Christians who do something like that, they just jump over deism all the way over to atheism.
Yeah unless you remain spiritual in a practical sense there’s probably almost no difference at all.I don't really remember the exact sequence of events when I got out of belief. I probably was a deist for a short time but once things start going it snowballs into atheism pretty fast. At least for me. It took a couple of months once I started to doubt.
Epistemology is definitely a subjective and tricky thing. I think I fit somewhere in the middle. I know that a large chunk of my belief is built ontop of inference and I’m ok with that, since it’s on a foundation of personal experience. I know that on one side of me there are people who would frown on both of those forms of evidence as totally insufficient, and then to the other side of me there are people who would believe on much less reasons than me. At the end of the day IMHO a person’s belief in Christianity will be rocky if the foundation isn’t personal experience. And again I know that many will epistemologically consider that statement to be a logical error on my part. But I believe in mystical ‘Knowledge.’Maybe, my experience was basically learning epistemology, skepticism and logic. With those tools it was clear that my belief was on bad reasoning. God could exist, there is just not sufficient reasons to believe it does.
No, He does know our hearts, he knows that we naturally hate a God like Himself. That is why our heart has to be changed to truly believe and grow spiritually to complete our mission with His help to destroy evil forever.But God created humanity knowing the likelihood that most would not believe the precise way it wants us to (assuming this God functions in that manner and not through universal reconciliation or some variant where it actually might care about our hearts and not just a particular belief about scapegoating and sin),
No, we are not punished for being imperfect. We are punished for not acknowledging our Creator and refusing to follow His moral law which is for our own good in this world and the next. This can even be seen in His creation without the special revelation of the Bible so we are without excuse.mm: Except God is supposed to be all knowing and all powerful, so it could create a situation where our freewill is respected as a matter of respecting our autonomy and ALSO respecting our freedom to the extent that we are not punished merely because we are imperfect (as God would know) and must believe in the scapegoating for sin and such)
Ok, so it is with God, the physics points to His existence but you dont believe He actually exists.I believe it is the best explanation of the facts at the moment. But to say I believe it actually exists is maybe a stretch. I would say I don't know but the physics points to its existence.
My question bubbled up from your Creation comment.No, we are not punished for being imperfect. We are punished for not acknowledging our Creator and refusing to follow His moral law which is for our own good in this world and the next. This can even be seen in His creation without the special revelation of the Bible so we are without excuse.
If anything, I think that Physics points towards the Hindu image of God way more than the Christian image of God.Ok, so it is with God, the physics points to His existence but you dont believe He actually exists.
No, He does know our hearts, he knows that we naturally hate a God like Himself. That is why our heart has to be changed to truly believe and grow spiritually to complete our mission with His help to destroy evil forever.
No, your analogy has it reversed. The children refuse to acknowledge their father.
No, we are not punished for being imperfect. We are punished for not acknowledging our Creator and refusing to follow His moral law which is for our own good in this world and the next. This can even be seen in His creation without the special revelation of the Bible so we are without excuse.
No, I was only referring to how it can be seen in humans. Animals such as birds are not moral beings so they are not punished for anything because they dont make moral decisions.My question bubbled up from your Creation comment.
Every morning I watch Creation in the form of the variety of birds that visit the feeders setup outside my dining room window. Please explain how those birds are being punished for "not acknowledging our Creator and refusing to follow His moral law?"
It is my understanding that Hinduism teaches that the universe is eternal, physics says otherwise. If I am wrong about hindu teaching then you are free to correct me. There are other scientific and philosophical problems with Hinduism as well if you want to discuss.If anything, I think that Physics points towards the Hindu image of God way more than the Christian image of God.
I would be in the camp of mystic knowledge is unsupported by good evidence. But, in the end, a deist belief is more reasonable than a specific religious belief in my opinion. Are you a deist?Epistemology is definitely a subjective and tricky thing. I think I fit somewhere in the middle. I know that a large chunk of my belief is built ontop of inference and I’m ok with that, since it’s on a foundation of personal experience. I know that on one side of me there are people who would frown on both of those forms of evidence as totally insufficient, and then to the other side of me there are people who would believe on much less reasons than me. At the end of the day IMHO a person’s belief in Christianity will be rocky if the foundation isn’t personal experience. And again I know that many will epistemologically consider that statement to be a logical error on my part. But I believe in mystical ‘Knowledge.’
What physics points to the existence of God? Physics is clear that some form of matter/energy must exist, we just don't know what form that is.Ok, so it is with God, the physics points to His existence but you dont believe He actually exists.
By animals you likely mean non human animals, because we are technically animals as well, the problem becoming how the word in the vernacular tends to suggest something more of a prescriptive quality rather than the descriptive one I prefer to use myself more often: that we are animals rather than plants or the like taxonomically and "beast" could substitute just as well for the non-human animal so we don't have to add the qualifierNo, I was only referring to how it can be seen in humans. Animals such as birds are not moral beings so they are not punished for anything because they dont make moral decisions.
Physics doesn't state anything in regards to an absolute answer, because it's science, the universe very well could have a beginning, but that's one interpretation in regards to the Big bang cosmological model and there isn't necessarily evidence that leans primarily to one or the other given that we can't readily study beyond black holes, but merely speculate about what happens to Planck time beyond the event horizon, etc.It is my understanding that Hinduism teaches that the universe is eternal, physics says otherwise. If I am wrong about hindu teaching then you are free to correct me. There are other scientific and philosophical problems with Hinduism as well if you want to discuss.
So enlighten me, what do you think is the most likely explanation?
1. My wife and I had needs that equaled $2,037.
2. We didn't share the need with anyone.
3. A person in our community, who we weren't close with was spending time in prayer.
4. As a result of the time they spent in prayer, they believed that God wanted them to give us exactly $2,037.
5. They obeyed and did what they were prompted to do even though they didn't know us well and didn't know our need.
One of the key teachings of Hinduism is of the Energy, or primordial cosmic divine energy that moves through the entire Universe. Call it a Universal Force perhaps? It's a Life Force that expresses itSelf as a flow of Divine energy through the whole of Creation This is more in line with modern Physics than it is the Christian image of God as being separate and apart from Creation.It is my understanding that Hinduism teaches that the universe is eternal, physics says otherwise. If I am wrong about hindu teaching then you are free to correct me. There are other scientific and philosophical problems with Hinduism as well if you want to discuss.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?