• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

"Ask for Death!"

ballfan

Well-Known Member
Sep 6, 2005
2,697
12
78
NC
✟25,568.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Alabaster said:
No, I don’t think I will. I think when it comes to violent atrocities. I think it would be best if I were proven to be in support of them. This guilty until proven innocent thing you’re trying to do, very Christian mind you, is a poor precedent to set.


All you had to do was type. That you would refuse to condemm such acts is incomprehensible.
 
Upvote 0

ballfan

Well-Known Member
Sep 6, 2005
2,697
12
78
NC
✟25,568.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
JustOneWay said:
You prove his point while avoiding his statement. Black and white thinking will yield little understanding.

No. What I'm asking about can only be condemmed. Its not a subject to be political on or to have understanding as to why on. Suicide bombing and using children in this way is just plain wrong. Nothing right about it. And it seems "good" men can't bring themselves to condemm it for maybe their own petty reasons.
 
Upvote 0

utdbear

Catalina Wine Mixer....POW!
Jul 6, 2004
2,993
281
47
Dallas, TX
✟4,578.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Alabaster said:
Really? I thought Jesus said not to give false witness. Not that I expect professing Christians to have anything in common with Jesus. In the absence of professed support for anything I think the wise course would be to assume nothing.

Giving an accusation based on what I do know(which from what is available, implies you do believe suicide bombing is OK) isn't bearing false witness. Knowing you don't and telling everybody you do is bearing false witness. It's a pretty simple concept. You sure do talk down to people a lot, considering you don't know much. You might want to rethink that policy, its not working too well.
 
Upvote 0

Alabaster

Well-Known Member
Aug 12, 2005
1,047
78
51
✟1,684.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Married
ballfan said:
No. What I'm asking about can only be condemmed. Its not a subject to be political on or to have understanding as to why on. Suicide bombing and using children in this way is just plain wrong. Nothing right about it. And it seems "good" men can't bring themselves to condemm it for maybe their own petty reasons.

I think I am not supporting anything of the sort unless I ******support it*******.

Shocking I know, but if you want someone who will jump through hoops for you, you could get a poodle, or possibly a porpoise, though it would be harder to walk on a leash.

As it is, guilty until proven innocent is just silly, but if you would like to adopt that position, please feel free.
 
Upvote 0

Alabaster

Well-Known Member
Aug 12, 2005
1,047
78
51
✟1,684.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Married
utdbear said:
Giving an accusation based on what I do know(which from what is available, implies you do believe suicide bombing is OK) isn't bearing false witness. Knowing you don't and telling everybody you do is bearing false witness. It's a pretty simple concept. You sure do talk down to people a lot, considering you don't know much. You might want to rethink that policy, its not working too well.

Really? Well tell me "what is available" that "implies believe suicide bombing is OK."

I would love to see.
 
Upvote 0

dignitized

Well-Known Member
Aug 5, 2005
24,931
759
✟29,618.00
mhatten said:
It is an example of just how depraved people are.

With new weapons that are lightweight and easy to fire, children are more easily armed, with less training than ever before. Worldwide, more than half a million children under-18 have been recruited into government armed forces, paramilitaries, civil militia and a wide variety of non-state armed groups in more than 85 countries. At any one time, more than 300,000 of these children are actively fighting as soldiers with government armed forces or armed political groups.
.

You know though - there is a difference recruiting kids to fight, and recruiting kids to kill themselves.
 
Upvote 0

Wolf Georges

Active Member
Feb 15, 2005
359
41
57
NNJ
✟695.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
ballfan said:
No. What I'm asking about can only be condemmed. Its not a subject to be political on or to have understanding as to why on. Suicide bombing and using children in this way is just plain wrong. Nothing right about it. And it seems "good" men can't bring themselves to condemm it for maybe their own petty reasons.

Seems like his reason maybe that he feels he is being judged and that he does not feel he should make statements simply because he is being pushed to.

Considering the fact that he refers to these acts as "violent atrocities" it would seem that he views them negatively.

There seems to be nothing in his posts to imply that he supported these acts.
 
Upvote 0

ballfan

Well-Known Member
Sep 6, 2005
2,697
12
78
NC
✟25,568.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Wolf Georges said:
Seems like his reason maybe that he feels he is being judged and that he does not feel he should make statements simply because he is being pushed to.

Considering the fact that he refers to these acts as "violent atrocities" it would seem that he views them negatively.

There seems to be nothing in his posts to imply that he supported these acts.

Like some other posters here, if this were Americans doing these things, Alabasters condemnation would be loud, thourgh, unhesitate and neverending.

Why not that reaction with this?

BTW, where did he ever call them "violent atrocities"?

I see where Mach Zero did, but not Alabaster.
 
Upvote 0

Alabaster

Well-Known Member
Aug 12, 2005
1,047
78
51
✟1,684.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Married
ballfan said:
Like some other posters here, if this were Americans doing these things, Alabasters condemnation would be loud, thourgh, unhesitate and neverending.

Why not that reaction with this?

BTW, where did he ever call them "violent atrocities"?

I see where Mach Zero did, but not Alabaster.

Post 17. Read more, talk less.
 
Upvote 0
Aug 29, 2005
34,371
11,479
✟206,635.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Private
ballfan said:
No. What I'm asking about can only be condemmed. Its not a subject to be political on or to have understanding as to why on. Suicide bombing and using children in this way is just plain wrong. Nothing right about it. And it seems "good" men can't bring themselves to condemm it for maybe their own petty reasons.
Condemned, only in your point of view.(edited....with apologies)

You need to take a closer look at his stance. He has more of an issue with your attitude than you are willing to admit.

I condemn people using children as suicide bombers equally to soldiers invading other countries and killing innocent men, women and children. Wrong is wrong.
 
Upvote 0

ballfan

Well-Known Member
Sep 6, 2005
2,697
12
78
NC
✟25,568.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Alabaster said:
Post 17. Read more, talk less.

Ah yes, the answer to the post where you were given the chance to condemm these actions. The one in which you said-

" No, I don’t think I will."

I stand by what I said--

"Like some other posters here, if this were Americans doing these things, Alabasters condemnation would be loud, thourgh, unhesitate and neverending."
 
Upvote 0

praying

Snazzy Title Goes Here
Site Supporter
Jan 9, 2004
32,648
1,608
68
New Jersey
✟108,540.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Br. Max said:
You know though - there is a difference recruiting kids to fight, and recruiting kids to kill themselves.



There is a difference you are correct but unlike the Islamic kids who are recruited (and I am by no means condoning the action) most of the other children aren't recruited at all, they are forced to fight.
 
Upvote 0

dignitized

Well-Known Member
Aug 5, 2005
24,931
759
✟29,618.00
mhatten said:
There is a difference you are correct but unlike the Islamic kids who are recruited (and I am by no means condoning the action) most of the other children aren't recruited at all, they are forced to fight.
OKay well - it's not exactly like the palestinian kids are asked - Hey would you like to do this? out of the blue. There is serious brain washing that happens first.
 
Upvote 0

praying

Snazzy Title Goes Here
Site Supporter
Jan 9, 2004
32,648
1,608
68
New Jersey
✟108,540.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Br. Max said:
OKay well - it's not exactly like the palestinian kids are asked - Hey would you like to do this? out of the blue. There is serious brain washing that happens first.

I thinnk it is all reprehensible. :mad:

My point was that using children is not inidcative of Islam unfortunatley it is a widespread practice, always has been.
 
Upvote 0

dignitized

Well-Known Member
Aug 5, 2005
24,931
759
✟29,618.00
mhatten said:
I thinnk it is all reprehensible. :mad:

My point was that using children is not inidcative of Islam unfortunatley it is a widespread practice, always has been.
no it is not limited to islam - but no one can deny that THIS is a particularly heinous example. The only example I can think of that comes close is that of the Janissaries of the Ottoman empire.
 
Upvote 0