- Mar 21, 2005
- 19,419
- 673
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
- Politics
- UK-Liberal-Democrats
I suppose that would do it.If Satan does it, it is.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I suppose that would do it.If Satan does it, it is.
No.
Astrology links cause-and-effect to the configuration of the stars.
There are people who study it seriously. In high school, my best friend's mom was an astrologist.Astrology does it for everyday life using obscure reasoning, and it doesn't really, some honest magazine astrologists have admitted they just made it up.
What if Darth Vader would have married Ella Fitzgerald?
What if Ralph Nader would have married Sara Lee?
If Sondra Locke married Elliott Ness, then divorced him to marry Herman Munster?Elevator serenader!
Exactly as I thought:Christianity has more to validate it than Mithraism.
Didn't Christianity Borrow From Other Religions?"The resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth is the central doctrine of the Christian faith. Without it, Christianity would not be the unique claim to Truth that it is."
I always thought that Christianity existed from since the beginning of creation as the Lamb (Christ) that was slain from the creation of the world For he chose us (Christians) in him before the creation of the world to be holy and blameless in his sight...Rev 13:8, Eph 1:4.
They would live happily ever after with their new spouses? I think I'm missing something here...If Sondra Locke married Elliott Ness, then divorced him to marry Herman Munster?
If Liv Ullman married Judge Lance Ito, then divorced him and married Jerry Mathers?
Liv Ito Beaver (Leave it to Beaver).I don't get the second one.
That's quite an embellishment.
You don't put retroactive falsification on paper and get away with it.
Three different [human] authors wrote the same thing.
That's more than coincidental.
How do you know they didn't?Not when all three men belong to the same club.
How come we don't see Mayan/Chinese/Indian/European cultures talking about the sun suddenly going out for no apparent reason?
All related through culture and history. Where are the Mayan, Chinese, Aztec, Native American records corroborating the same?
Gone to dust?All related through culture and history. Where are the Mayan, Chinese, Aztec, Native American records corroborating the same?
So, non-existent evidence for those cultures but the cultures connected to the Christianity mythos do have those records? Maybe it's mere coincidence. However, that doesn't negate the fact that such evidence doesn't exist, regardless.Gone to dust?
You bet we do.So, non-existent evidence for those cultures but the cultures connected to the Christianity mythos do have those records?
Even if they were outside God's inspiration, wouldn't they have observed at least a partial eclipse and recorded it? I mean after all, the Mayans are known to have kept detailed records of solar and lunar eclipses, the movement of the planets and stars, etc. Why wouldn't they have at least a "secular" record of this happening?You bet we do.
You see --- the records that were written outside of God's inspiration are/were subject to nature; and nature doesn't take kindly to things existing eternally.
This is why Mother Nature is going to soon get a reality check.
For the second time --- who says they didn't?Even if they were outside God's inspiration, wouldn't they have observed at least a partial eclipse and recorded it? I mean after all, the Mayans are known to have kept detailed records of solar and lunar eclipses, the movement of the planets and stars, etc. Why wouldn't they have at least a "secular" record of this happening?