Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I didn't realise 16th century English folk spoke with a South African accentThere is no such thing as a nonsensical question, because there is always an answer. The merits of any question depends on the level of erudition. For example; If I were to ask a person in the 16th century "If you travel at the speed of light, will time slow down"? The answer you will get will probably be something like this "What thou asketh me doest of the lunar afflicted minde cometh in and manifestees eetself in the guise of reedicule"!
Ah, you're not as good as me - I've been pretending to be a physicist for the past 5200 postsI am very good at pretending.
come to think of it; American, Australian, and many colonies have retained the original 16th century English accent. Contemporary English accent has little resemblance to the 16th century English accent!I didn't realise 16th century English folk spoke with a South African accent
How could they have retained the original accent, if even in America there are widely different accents, let alone compared to Australia?come to think of it; American, Australian, and many colonies have retained the original 16th century English accent. Contemporary English accent has little resemblance to the 16th century English accent!
I've gone over Camping's calculations, and he makes very judicious use of the numbers. Many people have predicted the date of the Rapture using the Bible, and they all get different dates - dates which just so happen to occur shortly after they've made the prediction. The odds are not in Camping's favour.Hi
What are your thoughts on May 21.
Do you think it is the end?
Have a good one today
I think this link to a forum has some very interesting information: When did American accent become different from British?? | Antimoon ForumHow could they have retained the original accent, if even in America there are widely different accents, let alone compared to Australia?
I also thought the American accent was derived from Irish - my partner has a thick Irish accent and it sounds quite like a generic American one.
Well all philosophy boils down to physics, so I suppose this falls under my jurisdiction
I used to be of the belief that omniscience precluded genuine free will, but I've since changed my mind. Though I don't believe any omniscience exists, and I'm on the fence about free will, I don't see the two as mutually exclusive.
Omniscience means that your decisions are known. But they're still just that: your decisions. What you freely choose may be known by God (or whatever entity is omniscient), but he isn't forcing you to choose the decision you will make, the choice is still yours. If we have some 'soul' or 'spirit' that solves the problem of how we can be truly creative or spontaneous in our decision making*, that still wouldn't necessarily preclude an omniscient being from foreknowing what it is we will freely decide. The 'free' part means its our decision, not that it's unknowable.
That's my take, at least
*From a scientific point of view, a highly complex quantum mechanical interaction in the brain's synapses may result in a very sophisticated sorting algorithm, much like the sophisticated computer programmes that arise ultimately from rather basic logic gates, could give rise to a 'genuine free will' algorithm. Maybe, in contrast to epiphenomenalism, that's the reason why the concious mind evolved - to act as a decision making tool of such sophistication that conciousness was the inevitable outcome of such a collation of sensory data. Maybe
Sure, faux free will is a possibility. But so is true free will, I believe.I understand what you've said here completely. But I disagree, somewhat. If, from your perspective, you make a decision aren't you actually just under the false impression that you've made a free-willed choice? Since you aren't omniscient (total and complete knowledge), you won't know the outcome beforehand, obviously. BUT, god does.
I'd say it is, yes - you are free to make a decision contrary to the known outcome. You won't, but you're free to. It's like I can predict in all confidence that you won't kill yourself right now. You're free to, and my prediction, however confident, doesn't detract from that freedom. And if being 99% sure doesn't change that, why does being 100% sure? It's still your choice, you're the one who decides what happens, so it's your choice. And in that, it's free.Again, since you can never make a decision contrary to the known outcome, isn't fee will just an "illusion" that you have only because you don't know the outcome? But being that someone somewhere (god) DOES know, is it still really free will?
I've had a few rows about it myself over at EC - till I mulled it over myself and changed my mind. You can be sure I never told my opponents that thoughSorry if I'm being difficult, I'm just trying to wrap my head around this. It make my head hurt, honestly.
Interesting stuffI think this link to a forum has some very interesting information: When did American accent become different from British?? | Antimoon Forum
Also Greek spoken in Cyprus is closer in accent to the ancient Greek than the Greek spoken in Greece today.
Besides, even if the Rapture does occur, he believes that the unsaved (such as myself) will be annihilated - no fire and brimstone for me
Welcome to CF
I've had a few rows about it myself over at EC - till I mulled it over myself and changed my mind. You can be sure I never told my opponents that though
I think you're right to some point but not all decisions in life are so simple. For example, science can't tell you what will happen. It can only make predictions which will be inconclusive in most cases. Also science can't weigh pros and cons against each other, that's where it comes down to your subjective analysis of the situation.
No, it is not the scientific conclusion. If WE WANT to reduce poverty scientific knowledge can help us, science cannot tell us what WE WANT to do however.
No one said that science would tell us what we want. However, science can give us a course of action based on goals and evidence. All morals serve a goal, spoken or not.
hey Wiccan
How's your weekend going and Who's your favorite Physicist & Why?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?