• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Arguments for the Existence of God

Ana the Ist

Aggressively serene!
Feb 21, 2012
39,990
12,573
✟487,130.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
The brilliance of a sting, is that it only catches those who do not perceive it.

The brilliance of a straw man, is that only those who don't recognize it's a straw man think a good point was made.
 
Upvote 0

ScottA

Author: Walking Like Einstein
Site Supporter
Feb 24, 2011
4,309
657
✟78,847.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

Ana the Ist

Aggressively serene!
Feb 21, 2012
39,990
12,573
✟487,130.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married


Frankly, this anonymous "John" is an idiot and has no idea what he's talking about. It's not at all surprising though, that a christian propaganda website decided to use this quote for their purposes.

Once again, you've shown that you really don't understand the argument that you're advocating and instead choose to have others (this time anonymously) speak for you.
http://coldcasechristianity.com/2014/the-inevitable-consequence-of-an-atheistic-worldview/
 
Upvote 0

Ana the Ist

Aggressively serene!
Feb 21, 2012
39,990
12,573
✟487,130.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married

Here's a statement from Louise M Anthony, a Harvard grad Professor of Philosophy...

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/18/good-minus-god/?_r=0

If you care to read it, not only does she think atheists are moral and possess morality...but it needs no theistic sources whatsoever.

Now that we've both shown that philosophers have opinions on the morality of atheists...can you actually make an argument for your position? Or do you need to have others make it for you because it's subject matter that's simply over your head?
 
Upvote 0

Eudaimonist

I believe in life before death!
Jan 1, 2003
27,482
2,738
58
American resident of Sweden
Visit site
✟126,756.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Libertarian
Reactions: Ana the Ist
Upvote 0

Chriliman

Everything I need to be joyful is right here
May 22, 2015
5,895
569
✟173,201.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
How does theism fix epistemological issues? For example, we know, for a fact, that our faculties are faulty. This fact would hold true whether theism is true or not.

I like this question!

How did we come to know that fact if indeed our faculties are faulty?

It seems our faculties are perfect for determining what's true, but we didn't make our faculties ourselves, either God did or nature did.

What purpose does nature have in making beings with perfect faculties for determining what's true? ...There would be no purpose, no reason, no meaning.

If we are the result natural processes then there is no reason for why or how we can determine true things, which means the true things we do determine are meaningless.

What purpose does God have in making beings with perfect faculties for determining what's true? ...if God is infinite then there would be an infinite amount of reasons for doing so which equals life with infinite meaning or simply eternal life from God.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: Mediaeval
Upvote 0

HitchSlap

PROUDLY PRIMATE
Aug 6, 2012
14,723
5,468
✟288,596.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Which brings us right back to one of the first questions I ever asked you, one that you never have answered.

How would you know if you were wrong?
 
Upvote 0

DogmaHunter

Code Monkey
Jan 26, 2014
16,757
8,531
Antwerp
✟158,395.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
I like this question!
How did we come to know that fact if indeed our faculties are faulty?

Objective evidence. The kind of research that isn't dependend on our faculties. Or at the very least, minimizes the dependence thereof.

For example... my faculties might inform me that I am breathing clean air and that everything is a-okay. But at the same time, a technological device might inform me that I'm actually being bombarded by lethal amounts of radiation instead.

It seems our faculties are perfect for determining what's true

They aren't, which is why independend verifiable evidence always trumps testimony.

, but we didn't make our faculties ourselves, either God did or nature did.

Our faculties evolved.

What purpose does nature have in making beings with perfect faculties for determining what's true?

That's a backward question.
Evolution is not a pre-planned phenomena.

It rather is an inevitable process of "self optimisation" on the population level, which is unavoidable when you have systems that reproduce with variation and that are in competition for limited resources.

...There would be no purpose, no reason, no meaning.

Idd. Eventhough in hindsight, we could say that the reason is simply becoming better at surviving and reproducing. But it's a bottom up process - there's no plan or "intent" or whatever. There's just reproduction with variation, competition and the inevitable outcome thereof: evolution (or extinction).

If we are the result natural processes then there is no reason for why or how we can determine true things, which means the true things we do determine are meaningless.

That's complete nonsense. There not being a bottom down plan, does not mean that the result will be nonsensical.

There are still criteria in place.
Faculties that work well enough will always win over faculties that work less or not at all.

In evolution, we expect features and faculties wich aid survival and reproduction.
Faculties that are well enough are entirely within these expectations.
Faculties that are flawless are not - because well enough is "good enough" to survive and reproduce.

In fact, in a very real way, certain "faulty" aspects are actually BETTER for the purpose of survival and reproduction.

A well known example is "the false positive", which, unsurprisingly, is among the most common cognitive errors that humans are known to make.

You might have heared the example before, but for clarity I'll share it again.
Suppose you are an early hominid nomad on the plains of Africa. You hear a noise in the bushes. Is it a dangerous predator? Or is it just the wind shaking the leaves of the bush?

Those who assume up front that it is a dangerous predator (= the false positive), run like hell. Those that assume it is the wind, do not. Those that aren't sure and investigate the bush, don't run either.

If it IS a dangerous predator, both the one that assumes it is wind and the one that approaches the bush to investigate are dead.

The one that runs, and thus is prone to act on his false positive, always lives.

This is just one example. I need just one as well, to show that flawed faculties (upto a certain point) can actually increase your chances of survival.

What purpose does God have in making beings with perfect faculties for determining what's true?

Who knows... it is a meaningless question anyway, because our faculties are demonstrably not perfect.

...if God is infinite then there would be an infinite amount of reasons for doing so which equals life with infinite meaning or simply eternal life from God.

Nice attempt at an emotional argument.
 
Reactions: Ana the Ist
Upvote 0

Chriliman

Everything I need to be joyful is right here
May 22, 2015
5,895
569
✟173,201.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Which brings us right back to one of the first questions I ever asked you, one that you never have answered.

How would you know if you were wrong?

If I'm a result of natural processes then it doesn't matter if I'm wrong or right.

If I'm a result of God's creation then I'd trust Him before I'd trust myself because He obviously knows better than I do.
 
Reactions: Mediaeval
Upvote 0

Archaeopteryx

Wanderer
Jul 1, 2007
22,229
2,608
✟78,240.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
If I'm a result of natural processes then it doesn't matter if I'm wrong or right.
Why wouldn't it matter? Your beliefs shape your actions, which have real consequences, both for you and for others. So it does matter whether you are wrong or right. Presumably you don't cross the street thinking, "If I'm a result of natural processes, then it doesn't matter if I'm wrong or right about the likelihood of oncoming traffic." No, you look both ways before crossing.
 
Upvote 0

Chriliman

Everything I need to be joyful is right here
May 22, 2015
5,895
569
✟173,201.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married

You're still relying on your faulty faculties to determine that what the tech is telling you is actually true. So either our faculties are too faulty to even determine what's true or we can actually determine what's true despite the faults in our faculties.

I think the latter is true, otherwise why even try to determine what's true?
 
Upvote 0

HitchSlap

PROUDLY PRIMATE
Aug 6, 2012
14,723
5,468
✟288,596.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Because I like to believe as many true things as pssible.
 
Upvote 0

Chriliman

Everything I need to be joyful is right here
May 22, 2015
5,895
569
✟173,201.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married

I'm not the one saying that it's true that there is no plan or purpose for the existence of life on earth.

I think there is a plan and a purpose and this is why things matter.

If there is no plan or purpose for the existence of life on earth, then why do our actions matter? We could all go extinct from a nuclear disaster and it literally would not matter to anyone after we're all dead.

Sure, before everyone dies the person responsible for the disaster could be punished, but what's the point after everyone is dead? No point.
 
Upvote 0

Archaeopteryx

Wanderer
Jul 1, 2007
22,229
2,608
✟78,240.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
It seems that you've answered your own conundrum. We're alive. We're not indifferent. And we care.
 
Upvote 0