- Jun 4, 2013
- 10,132
- 996
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Widowed
- Politics
- US-Others
Radiation which did not decay at the same rate as it does today.You are dodging the question. The evidence is absolutely clear that the strata of the earth are not of the same age. It is also absolutely clear that some of them were in no way formed under water.
No such material has ever been found. What has been found is mineralised soft tissue which is a very different thing. Also you need to supply a reason as to why such material cannot survive as we have known that amber can preserve protein fragments for extremely long times.
The C14 in coal and diamonds is present due to well-known processes and is due to the radiation that exists underground.
We know as a fact that clocks slow due to acceleration. The universe began acceleration faster than c and has only continued to increase according to modern astronomical belief.
Since acceleration causes the atomic rate of atomic clocks to slow, then those clocks (atomic decay rate) was faster in the past.
Since they are using the rate clocks tick today to calculate into the past, they of course get the wrong answers. Clocks must be speed up exponentially as one calculates backwards.
So that billions of years worth of decay would have occurred in what to us is thousands of years of today's slower clocks.
Until they accept science and speed up clocks they know must have slowed to get to their present rate, the answers will always be wrong.
If the entire universe accelerated from the start, and acceleration causes the decay rate to slow, then by extension as one goes backwards in time towards that beginning then the decay rate became faster.
Just as the twin aged faster before he began his acceleration. I find it surprising that those that are supposed to be following science refuse to follow the science they claim to follow.
Upvote
0