Nihilist Virus
Infectious idea
Well, they are all valid. It's just that none of them are sound.
To establish soundness, you must establish the premises. So as someone noted above (@Nihilist Virus?), there are grounds to question the existence of truth. But even if you grant that, I can't grant that truth implies a god until the existence of gods is demonstrated.
A. If Truth exists, God doesn't.
B. Truth does.
C. God ain't.
Not very convincing, is it?
Right, even if we ignore fundamental limitations of language and logic, we're still left with the issue that logic/mathematics is just assumptions, definitions, and the conclusions that follow. You cannot determine facts about reality from assumptions and definitions. The existence of a deity (or anything at all) must be something discerned from physical evidence.
Upvote
0