• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Argument based English

BattleAxe

Excited To Know Jesus
Aug 30, 2003
548
48
60
North Carolina
Visit site
✟927.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
I am taking this class and I am doing really well, in fact my professor said I was a 'breath of fresh air' one of the best student he's had in years...:amen:

But...I am baffled as to what my final paper will be????? I am tired of the same ole arguments, the death penalty, abortion, race relations, the law in general...

Any good ideas for research??
 

Boss_BlueAngels

Life is better when you're flying upside down.
Jul 19, 2005
2,895
130
Seattle
Visit site
✟29,326.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Yeah, I love research papers too.

My advice to you is just do something that you're interested in. I always do mine on different aspects of aviation safety. It helps inform those who read it, and mostly it helps me learn different ways to be safer at the same time.
 
Upvote 0

kofh2u

Well-Known Member
Apr 16, 2005
956
15
santa monica, california
✟1,248.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Matt.9:22 said:
oooh....I love research papers!! The last one I did was on women and equal rights in america. It covered the right to vote, reproductive rights, title IX and supreme court cases about women's right. That was fun to write! How about that as a topic?


Absolutely!

We need Christian commentary on this subject.

Only Christian sensitivity and recognized love, going before the social criticism due Femininists' selfishness, will be acceptable.

We need a Christian paper which criticizes women in regard to the whole Social Contract, between all parties to it.

Who else can do it? Not men. Not politicians.

Women, under the age of thirty, insist upon rights and exemptions based only upon their view, that they are independent from the whole of the Social Contract.

They suggest that they are immune from a social perspective that comments upon them and their "bodies," meaning their Sexual License and their pregnacies.

This is absurd.

But it has been so well promoted and totally unrefutted that it sounds legitimate.

The social contract involves responsibility and contribution from each segment composing it.

Single Men/Women, Elders, Marrieds, adolescents, Children, Babies, and the Fetus, all members of the Ericson Life Stages Continuum, are tied together and intertwined in a Social Network which can not tolerate anyone of these seven categories of the Social Membership unilaterally stating a monopoly on themselves based upon such a premise. Everyone is here, in the society, because of the Social Contract which created this Society.

The sexual "freedom" of adolescence affects the taxes, the public health, the modestly, and the future of the next generation, the protectiin of the last.

The Elders must continue to support Public Edication in the taxes upon their private property when they and no "body" in their household who is of school age. Elders, in regard to'bodies," like single, unmarried, never married women are similarly restrained from such a unique self centeredness.

This obligation to the Social Contract is true about Children, too, who are obligated to attend school for 12 years and cooperate with their own enculturation.

Married adults are held, legally, to the support of one another and their children.

Even babies incur a responsibilty to protect the elderly in time to come, both of these members in The Ericson Age of Trust.

So, from this short commentary, a whole paper ought bring forth the arugment that women,indeed, DO need Social Correction.

These are the people in the Social Membership who insist upon an separate sexual freedom that creates a Norm of a whoredom, abuses the Institution of marriage, condones a 60% no fault divorce, creates 1.23 million abortions each year, plagues us with STD, and more.

They are now united in Political Movement that ignors many other social responsibilities among their bedfellows who support them in this social breach dependent upon the mutuality of defeating the Christian morality.

In this, their one sided breach of the Social Contract has interjected a Matriarchial swing toward a dangerous social condition, one threatening our military preparedness and the focus on education.

I believe you can flush out and flesh out this whole matter in an effective paper.

Good luck, whatever.
 
Upvote 0

kofh2u

Well-Known Member
Apr 16, 2005
956
15
santa monica, california
✟1,248.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
SOLDOUT4HIM said:
there are a lot of interesting issues floating arond, I am on the Debate team in college so this is right up my alley. What about HESCR? (Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research) or SC's in general? Another possibility could be what to do about the poss. out break of avian influenza.

Your applause of the comments and suggestions are seconded by me.

I would like to add, Stem Cell Research is not an issue, per se.

The issue is whether the government should pay for it, when govt represents religious people against this, and secular people unconcerned with the ethics involved.
It is essentially religion asking the State to refrain from entering their domain, the realmof the God of the Living, that's all. It is part of the dialogue, removing the Ten Commandments, and eliminating the word God in the dollar bill, and all that.


Private work on Stem Cell Research is legal, and there is no criticism of it, as far as law is concerned. As far as I know, the matter is purely concerned with whether Tax dollars should be sent to college labs as grants to professors and researchers.
 
Upvote 0

kofh2u

Well-Known Member
Apr 16, 2005
956
15
santa monica, california
✟1,248.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Billy Batson said:
the stupidity of affirmative action.


Billy, I disagree.

America needs MORE action directed at affirming the national interest, specifically, in redressing the problems inherent in the people that came 400years ago, from Europe. Those people who came here, way back then, who carried the European idea of slavery into this new world, also raised up a nation of wonderful people.

Only 100 years free, after 1776, from the Western European mentality, we the people, here in America, freed this new world of the ancient concept of slavery, 1865.
We AFFIRMED in blood, during the Civil War, that by the crucifixion of 600,000 dead, all men would be free. Those dead, more than the sum of all other American wars, need be AFFIRMED as the symbol that brought black and white together in our country.

We still have work to be done.
Whereas you might be right, we do NOT need to affirm the opportunity for all students to enter our educational institutions, our military, nor to intrermarry, intergrate neighborhoods, and sports, our entertainment, night clubs, nite life, advertising, TV Newscasting, etc.,... we still need to affirm equal opportunity of employment in the Trade Unions.

We need affirm America, too, as a people, now 150 years strong, a century and a half of intiating civil rights, living the truth of social equality. We need all say that we affirm a present white community which turned its back, a century and a half ago, on the tradition and the practices that went before, and, for a couple thousand years.
We need affirm America, and the Black community, both, now integrated. It is our greatest banner of success.

But, we need now affirm that the black communities are as safe and crime free as all other American Communities.

It is no little thing that Bill Bennett brought to our attention, that 75% of American violent crime would disappear, if we discounted the young black male community.

We need now work with the black leadership of men like Bill Cosby. We need now Affirm that no black community will suffer economic devaluation, no blackchild will be struck with a drug pusher's bullets, no small businessman will flee that neighborhood, no home will lose economic value, because of the crime rate.
Further, we must Afirm that no white American will fear liviing, buying a home in these intercities where taxes and home ownership are attractive inducements.

The black and white communities MUST affirm a better America by affirmative policies that need action.
 
Upvote 0

BattleAxe

Excited To Know Jesus
Aug 30, 2003
548
48
60
North Carolina
Visit site
✟927.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
First of all THANKS for the many good suggestions...keep em coming as I am not decided yet. I am struggling to get inspired.

Argument: is a form of discourse in which the writer or speaker tries to persuade an audience to accept, reject, or think a certain way about a problem that cannot be solved by scientific or mathematical reasoning alone.

In addition to many format styles, every augument must have appeals:

1. Ethical: the appeal to traditions, authority, ethical and moral behaviour
2. Emotional: the appeal to feelings and basic human needs such as being loved, belonging, health and well being.
3.Rational: the appeal to reason and logic

kofh2u actually offered a very effective 'mini' argument above in their post. He or she utilized all the elements of an effective appeal in a short amount of space. Very well done.

I know I really need to deal with moral issues in oiur society but I am recovering from my last paper ("What impact does the American Atheist have on Modern Day society?" ) and my mind is just not wrapping around anything right now. But I am getting inspired. Please keep it coming.
 
Upvote 0

Billy Batson

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2004
694
31
44
jesusland :'(
✟1,009.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
kofh2u said:
Billy, I disagree.

America needs MORE action directed at affirming the national interest, specifically, in redressing the problems inherent in the people that came 400years ago, from Europe. Those people who came here, way back then, who carried the European idea of slavery into this new world, also raised up a nation of wonderful people.

Only 100 years free, after 1776, from the Western European mentality, we the people, here in America, freed this new world of the ancient concept of slavery, 1865.
We AFFIRMED in blood, during the Civil War, that by the crucifixion of 600,000 dead, all men would be free. Those dead, more than the sum of all other American wars, need be AFFIRMED as the symbol that brought black and white together in our country.

We still have work to be done.
Whereas you might be right, we do NOT need to affirm the opportunity for all students to enter our educational institutions, our military, nor to intrermarry, intergrate neighborhoods, and sports, our entertainment, night clubs, nite life, advertising, TV Newscasting, etc.,... we still need to affirm equal opportunity of employment in the Trade Unions.

We need affirm America, too, as a people, now 150 years strong, a century and a half of intiating civil rights, living the truth of social equality. We need all say that we affirm a present white community which turned its back, a century and a half ago, on the tradition and the practices that went before, and, for a couple thousand years.
We need affirm America, and the Black community, both, now integrated. It is our greatest banner of success.

But, we need now affirm that the black communities are as safe and crime free as all other American Communities.

It is no little thing that Bill Bennett brought to our attention, that 75% of American violent crime would disappear, if we discounted the young black male community.

We need now work with the black leadership of men like Bill Cosby. We need now Affirm that no black community will suffer economic devaluation, no blackchild will be struck with a drug pusher's bullets, no small businessman will flee that neighborhood, no home will lose economic value, because of the crime rate.
Further, we must Afirm that no white American will fear liviing, buying a home in these intercities where taxes and home ownership are attractive inducements.

The black and white communities MUST affirm a better America by affirmative policies that need action.
as a member of a minority class (not a discriminated class), even i feel that the conditions by which affirmative puts people at an automatic disadvantage are grossly unjust.

one line of thought:
Preferential hiring seen as compensation looks perverse, they contended, since it benefits individuals (blacks and women possessing good educational credentials) least likely harmed by past wrongs while it burdens individuals (younger white male applicants) least likely to be responsible for past wrongs.

see the discrepency?
 
Upvote 0

Matt.9:22

I've got mustard seed faith!
Dec 6, 2004
2,879
131
39
Texas
✟3,671.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
I disagree with affirmative action not being needed and not just because I'm black. I'm a straight a student, with no criminal history and a dedication to excellency, so I can easily get in on my own merit. But I find that the people who argue against AA are usually people who have had their jobs "taken" by a member of the minority and feel that AA is the only reason that person got the job. But could it possibly be because the person was qualified. If it were not for AA and the majority person had the job, the minority person could just as easily argue that he only got the job because he was white. So AA is still needed until we can see past the color of skin, and like it or not some people still have discriminatory hiring practices whether it's intentional or not.
 
Upvote 0

BattleAxe

Excited To Know Jesus
Aug 30, 2003
548
48
60
North Carolina
Visit site
✟927.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
The paper is due the end of Nov. and I begged the instructor for a heads up on what the assignment would be and he said it could be on anything we choose but its got to be a social issue that can be argued.

I am not sure if this class would be a good median to argue Jesus since in essence I am only directing the argument at the instructor (who is a christian) unless I would have the good blessing of publishing the paper.

I am just burned out completely on things that don't seem to change and it is argued and argued and argued and yet effective change is not forthcoming. I KNOW that eliminates half the social issues we face!!! But I am just looking to get inspired. Affirmative Action is a good suggestion. I am black but I know only the basics of it. So it would be a good opportunity to enlighten myself, form an opinion and the 'argue' that opinion. But again...keep em coming as I am not totally sold out on it.

Thanks guys you are all great.
 
Upvote 0

Matt.9:22

I've got mustard seed faith!
Dec 6, 2004
2,879
131
39
Texas
✟3,671.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
How about the time limits on welfare. I think now you can only be on welfare for three years and you can only be on unemployment for 2 years I think. You can argue on why those are or aren't good time limits and what could be done in lieu of welfare. or what can be done to encouragement self-efficieny and employment other than placing time limits on those who may truly need the help.
 
Upvote 0

BattleAxe

Excited To Know Jesus
Aug 30, 2003
548
48
60
North Carolina
Visit site
✟927.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Matt 9, that a really good idea. I am bouncing that around right now. My little ole nest has been empty for awhile so I don't need federal assistance but if I did, would the time constrains be enough time for me to really get on my feet especially if I had small children and as you said (and more importantly) what could be alternatives that are helpful and maybe more realistic. Hummm????
 
Upvote 0