Argue the Opposite

[Paradoxum]

Is it against the Christian God, a monotheistic version of God, or the concept of divinity in general?

It's up to you.

I've gave some arguments in my first post that you could argue against.

So you saw healings and/or near instant healings ? If so, please feel free to tell

I wasn't asking so much about your arguments, rather, something you've seen or experienced personally in your life that you were like, "THAT is proof !" or perhaps near proof, etc.

I didn't see healings, I just heard of them from people or organisations I trusted. I'd heard people talking about being healing.

I once prayed for someone in a group, and we all felt a strong 'presence of God' as I was praying. I was already doubting God at that point, but I think I viewed that as potentially good evidence.

 

[Davian]

I let out a chuckle when I read this. The modal ontological argument is probably one of the strongest - but still not strong.

I think (and so sorry for repeating WLC) but that each of these arguments in and of themselves are not perfect and nor do they alone prove that God exists. They are all part of accumulating evidence for God.

How big does this accumulation ever get?

 

[TillICollapse]

I didn't see healings, I just heard of them from people or organisations I trusted. I'd heard people talking about being healing.

I once prayed for someone in a group, and we all felt a strong 'presence of God' as I was praying. I was already doubting God at that point, but I think I viewed that as potentially good evidence.

Hmm ... interesting. I wonder why you viewed that as potentially good evidence ?

 

[daniel777]

It is really really hard to argue the opposite of what you think makes good sense without devolving into parodies of those arguments.

I find it terribly sad you can't see or experience the world apart from your little book.