An excellent point! Now your going to tell me that treating people as if they were animals was a good thing? I disagree.
It seems your definition is bunk.
I'm not trying to. I'm noting that people
don't care about the scientific definition. That we conduct every aspect of our lives as non-animals and could not care less what definition biologists use. We just don't care
what they think and make our own laws to live by. Show me one reference to support your claim that we
are animals:
Advocacy
Alternative dispute resolution
Aviation law
Chancery
Charity law
Children law
Civil liberties and human rights
Civil litigation
Clinical negligence
Commercial law
Commercial litigation
Commercial property
Common law
Company law
Competition law
Computer and IT law
Consumer law
Consumer redress
Conveyancing residential
Costs
Courts, tribunals and judiciary
Criminal law
Defamation law
Disability
Discrimination law
EU law
Education law
Employment law
Environmental law
Family law
Financial and investment services
Fraud
Immigration law
Industrial Disease
Insolvency and bankruptcy
Insurance law
Intellectual property law
International law (non EU)
Judiciary
Landlord and tenant - residential
Legal aid - civil
Legal aid - criminal
Legal aid - immigration
Licensing law
Matrimonial law
Media and entertainment law
Mediation
Mental health and incapacity law
Mergers and acquisitions
Neighbour disputes
Older people
Partnership law
Personal injury
Planning law
Practice management
Private Client
Professional regulation
Projects law
Real Estate
Sports law
Tax law
Travel and tourism
Trust law
Wills and probate
The Law Society
Next you'll be telling me that life begins at conception and should be protected.