• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Are we subcontracting the RED CROSS to do our work?

Status
Not open for further replies.

ChiRho

Confessional Lutheran Catholic
Mar 5, 2004
1,821
99
44
Fort Wayne
✟17,482.00
Faith
Lutheran
Politics
US-Libertarian
Christianforums has thought it appropriate to provide a large link to the Red Cross on it's homepage. At quick glance, one commends them for wanting to help the victims of Katrina. But after a few seconds, I recognized the horrible reality. The Red Cross, and not Christian churches, are providing the help. Is this not a site promoting Christianity? Are there no churches that are accepting donations to help out? If there are, why is there link omitted, while the charitable, yet religionless, Red Cross is positioned in clear view?

Strange liars we are, huh?
 

GutterRat

Senior Veteran
Aug 25, 2005
3,049
160
49
Chi-town...area...burbs.
Visit site
✟3,987.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
ChiRho said:
Christianforums has thought it appropriate to provide a large link to the Red Cross on it's homepage. At quick glance, one commends them for wanting to help the victims of Katrina. But after a few seconds, I recognized the horrible reality. The Red Cross, and not Christian churches, are providing the help. Is this not a site promoting Christianity? Are there no churches that are accepting donations to help out? If there are, why is there link omitted, while the charitable, yet religionless, Red Cross is positioned in clear view?

Strange liars we are, huh?


Actually - no. The Red Cross is among the best organization to mobilize such a relief effort. This is a massive undertaking - the Red Cross has the network already setup to get in & start helping. Much faster than the Church can.

ChiRho said:
But after a few seconds, I recognized the horrible reality. The Red Cross, and not Christian churches, are providing the help.

Not really sure what you've been reading or watching. The church is crazy involved. Various church's from all over the country are sending people, supplies, food, ect... to NO & to Houston to help. The Church is involved in a big way.

I'm not sure how anyone is a "liar". Just because CF doesn't have a page with every single group that is taking donations - doesn't make them liars. Just because the Red Cross is not a "christian organization" doesn't mean CF shouldn't support them.
 
Upvote 0

Entertaining_Angels

Well-Known Member
Aug 12, 2004
6,104
565
east coast
✟31,475.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Oh my, have you spent any time on this one particular forum? Can you imagine if they picked a church, you'd have untold numbers from other churches decrying the choice.

The Red Cross is not my first choice in aid organizations but it is general enough that it will make most people happy.

Personally, I don't much care how the help gets there, so long as it does. I know my church is doing what it can to help.
 
Upvote 0

theend0218

Everything is everything.
Apr 5, 2005
659
59
72
texas
✟1,118.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I think if Christians are giving the Church is involved. One of the issues that used to concern me was how many times various congregations wanted to duplicate efforts by creating their own organization to accomplish something rather than working with ones already set and ready to go. At times I suspected it was really more a desire for recognition - not necessarily of an individual, but a desire for the "church" to be recognized by those receiving help, or by the "world" for doing a good work. Perhaps this is not the issue raised here. Perhaps it goes to the heart of what it means to be the church. At any rate, I think it is a good work regardless of how it gets done or who gets the credit for it. Just my thought.
 
Upvote 0

Chief117

Conservative Soldier for Christ
Jan 21, 2005
451
51
41
Indiana
Visit site
✟15,883.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Personally, I recognize the ability of the Red Cross to organize a decent relief effort, but I also find MUCH fault with the Overhead that chews up any and all donations that pass through their hands.

It's a sad thing that so much of the money sent through them is backlogged and lining the pockets of the administrators and office buildings--not to mention the already-mentioned fact that there is no evangelism or other related practice involved with their work.

Personally, I have been (very pleasantly) surprised at the response of the American churches. Usually I would be the first to cry out, "Why aren't we doing something?!!!" But I didn't have to this time, praise the Lord. I also made sure that all of our donations went through churches, whose goods likely supported the Red Cross as well, but didn't involve so much wasted money.
 
Upvote 0

theend0218

Everything is everything.
Apr 5, 2005
659
59
72
texas
✟1,118.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Chief117 - You are comparing apples to oranges, so to speak. I suspect that if you took any congregation or denomination (as a group of congregations) as a relief organization, the amount spent on "overhead" would far surpass that of almost any recognized and legitimate relief organization that is not a "church." Take any congregation's budget and see how much goes for property, buildings, administration, maintenance, etc. Then look at the amount that is given away to others not associated with the church.

It is not really fair to compare "special" offerings taken periodically by congregations for one set purpose with organizations that have to be ready every moment to step in when needed. Of course they have overhead. However, I would be shocked if any church budget gave away even 20% of its annual budget to those in need. Most valid relief organizations have a 15 to 25% overhead cost. In this light, I think they do a pretty good job of giving out what is given to them. Much better than most congregations by far.

Again, special offerings taken by a congregation for one project is a very small per cent of their annual budget. Because it is a "special offering" of course they can say they gave 100% of it away, but it is only because their overhead costs are already taken care of by other gifts.

A congregation will say that it is not primarily a relief organization. So be it. That being the case, it cannot then turn around and compare itself financially to relief organizations when it does decide to help.
 
Upvote 0

MrJim

Legend 3/17/05
Mar 17, 2005
16,491
1,369
FEMA Region III
✟50,122.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I prefer Mennonite Disaster Service myself...

Guess CF wanted something generally recognized and trustworthy for those that don't have a relief agency they give to. Probably better than "Harry's Hurricane Rescue Service" (although I think Harry does a good job).
 
Upvote 0

12volt_man

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2004
7,339
260
✟9,150.00
Faith
Christian
ChiRho said:
Christianforums has thought it appropriate to provide a large link to the Red Cross on it's homepage. At quick glance, one commends them for wanting to help the victims of Katrina. But after a few seconds, I recognized the horrible reality. The Red Cross, and not Christian churches, are providing the help. Is this not a site promoting Christianity? Are there no churches that are accepting donations to help out? If there are, why is there link omitted, while the charitable, yet religionless, Red Cross is positioned in clear view?

Strange liars we are, huh?

While I do prefer to give my money to the SBC (third largest disaster relief organization in the world...300,000 meals a day in NOLA this week and they've been asked by the Red Cross to increase that to 500,000) and Samaritan's Purse (they were on the ground and running before the Red Cross even got their trucks loaded), I think you're being a little unfair to the Red Cross.

In a case like this, those who can help, should help. There will be plenty of time to divide over ideology later.

It reminds me a little of the Simpsons episode where Maude Flanders dies and Homer, completely forgetting that the funeral really is not about him, whines, "Marge, stop hogging Flanders! I want to comfort him!"
 
Upvote 0

12volt_man

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2004
7,339
260
✟9,150.00
Faith
Christian
Chief117 said:
Personally, I recognize the ability of the Red Cross to organize a decent relief effort, but I also find MUCH fault with the Overhead that chews up any and all donations that pass through their hands.

It's a sad thing that so much of the money sent through them is backlogged and lining the pockets of the administrators and office buildings...


This is just one of the reasons I won't give to them.

After Sept 11, we all found out that a lot of the money we gave, thinking we were helping the people in NYC, never got there.
 
Upvote 0

Entertaining_Angels

Well-Known Member
Aug 12, 2004
6,104
565
east coast
✟31,475.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I know when I worked in a third-world nation, the groups I was most impressed by were the much smaller groups and missionaries.

Samaritan's Purse is an excellent choice if you are looking for a group that doesn't mishandle their funds and uses the majority of the funds to actually help the people they are there to help. I cannot recommend them enough.
 
Upvote 0

12volt_man

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2004
7,339
260
✟9,150.00
Faith
Christian
OreGal said:
Samaritan's Purse is an excellent choice if you are looking for a group that doesn't mishandle their funds and uses the majority of the funds to actually help the people they are there to help. I cannot recommend them enough.

Franklin Graham is on FOX right now talking about SP's relief efforts.

He's also preaching the Gospel pretty boldly. Way to go.

I tuned in halfway through the story, so forgive me if I have my facts wrong, but I believe he said that his parents, Billy and Ruth Bell Graham, are hosting evacuees on their Montreat, NC farm.

Gotta love that whole family.
 
Upvote 0

12volt_man

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2004
7,339
260
✟9,150.00
Faith
Christian
OreGal said:
What show was he on tonight? I know they repeat their shows all night. Maybe I'll watch.

He was on Hannity and What'shisname.

That organization impresses the socks off me. When my children are older, I'd love to volunteer to work with them. We'll see where God has us then.

That'd be cool.

Kids who volunteer really benefit.
 
Upvote 0

dignitized

Well-Known Member
Aug 5, 2005
24,931
759
✟29,618.00
The Salvation Army is also on the front lines giving aid AND is one of the best run and most successful of the relief organizations. HOWEVER - the red Cross does have blanket and universal appeal and not all CF members are Christians. As long as it's the American Red Cross and not the International Red Cross - I don't have a problem giving through them.
 
Upvote 0

JimfromOhio

Life of Trials :)
Feb 7, 2004
27,738
3,738
Central Ohio
✟67,748.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
I have my own list of organizations when I decide to donate money or my time. The Red Cross is one of the most recognizable symbols in the world today and usually show up at the time of need. Red Cross is not a Christian organization nor connected to any Christian organizations.

Top 8 Disaster Relief Organizations
http://christianity.about.com/od/practicaltools/tp/disasterrelief.htm

Historically, as an Accountant, I found that Red Cross' overhead costs are averaging about 7.6 % which is VERY GOOD since many organizations are trying to survive with 20% over-head costs. Red Cross' over-head costs are usually related to medical (blood storage, transporation, labs and etc) and administrative costs.

I find Red Cross a wonderful organization with strong stewardship of their finances. Also Red Cross probably have the largest volunteers on board.
 
Upvote 0

Chief117

Conservative Soldier for Christ
Jan 21, 2005
451
51
41
Indiana
Visit site
✟15,883.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
theend0218 said:
Chief117 - You are comparing apples to oranges, so to speak. I suspect that if you took any congregation or denomination (as a group of congregations) as a relief organization, the amount spent on "overhead" would far surpass that of almost any recognized and legitimate relief organization that is not a "church." Take any congregation's budget and see how much goes for property, buildings, administration, maintenance, etc. Then look at the amount that is given away to others not associated with the church.

That is the most absurd thing I've ever heard. THAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE MONEY given in tithes for one, so ALL of the money I gave went exactly where it was supposed to.

Secondly, when we give in our churches to go toward a specific thing, 100% of it GOES THERE. You, brother, are incorrect.

It is not really fair to compare "special" offerings taken periodically by congregations for one set purpose with organizations that have to be ready every moment to step in when needed. Of course they have overhead. However, I would be shocked if any church budget gave away even 20% of its annual budget to those in need.

It then appears that you have an issue to take up with your church. You're supposed to tithe, this money should primarily go toward "business expenses." This is the purpose of the money, and ALL excess should go out to those in need. Offerings, however, should also be part of a believer's giving, and that goes above and beyond the call. But then again, I'll concede the point. Let's say that happens.

Also, lets compare apples to apples: the "special offerings" given to church for a certain event....off the top of my head, lets say for Hurricane Katrina victims and compare that with the money given to the Red Cross specifically for the same event. Let's see which organization gives the most money it was given toward the effort. I GUARANTEE you its the church.

And this is a fair comparison. Relief organizations thrive just as much off of our donations as they do off of other funding. So in essence, they should be even more prepared than our churches.

Most valid relief organizations have a 15 to 25% overhead cost. In this light, I think they do a pretty good job of giving out what is given to them. Much better than most congregations by far.

I would love to agree, I really would. I mean, it looks good on paper. However, how much could be done for these people if others weren't lining their pockets off of a natural disaster.

Again, special offerings taken by a congregation for one project is a very small per cent of their annual budget. Because it is a "special offering" of course they can say they gave 100% of it away, but it is only because their overhead costs are already taken care of by other gifts.

A congregation will say that it is not primarily a relief organization. So be it. That being the case, it cannot then turn around and compare itself financially to relief organizations when it does decide to help.

Hey, I can agree with that. I'm not saying the Red Cross does nothing. We probably couldn't have made it without them. Nonetheless, and comparing apples to apples, when I give money for a specific event it by golly better go toward that event. And that is something that does not happen with these groups.

Not to mention they do it for the wrong reasons. These people would be much better off experiencing the Love of Christ.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.