From your standpoint perhaps. But please note that not EVERYONE has been exposed to the same information. One reason is that I usually skipped the whole thing as silly and didn't read the reasons why they were saying such a thing. I imagine that there are plenty of others who are doing the same.
Thanks. I will take a look. I have watched various videos. Some raise questions concerning why gyroscopes on planes don't compensate for Earth curvature.
Easily proven false but more importantly, there are two disturbing factors here.
Good...then here's another:
Let me ask as well... is it ONLY the earth or the rest of the celestial bodies as well? I ask because I took a picture through my telescope the other night of the moon. I noticed later that the craters in the middle by the light/dark line... were facing me... but the ones near the top were facing UP which is what they should be if the moon is a ball. So the moon IS a ball, I saw it with my own eyes... but the earth is flat??? Because somebody has an inability to reconcile an issue with a gyroscope? Gosh... in the late 1940's we video taped from planes going around the world with spotters videoing the planes from the ground... all around the world. This was debunked 600 YEARS ago.
I'm guessing that should be 'attitude' meter...
Nova has a very good program about how the Universe did not expand or inflate so much as the universe unfolded. There is talk about the ancient Japanese art of origami is becoming a scientific theory for creation.
And for good reason. In the end, this remains a non-issue... a distraction. Blessings.
You don't agree that the earth revolves around the sun? Heliocentricism is the sun at the center of the solar system with the planets revolving around it. I think that is a sound conclusion... I think anything less means you have millions of amateur astronomers (like myself) in cahoots with the government.... and no, I believe in adaptation but not evolution.
