Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You mean hypothesis and you can disprove it by finding one atheist who is not angry at God.I have a theory that all atheists are angry at God. I have not met every atheist, so I can't prove it.
Yes it is very common. I could comb through posts to show you few are angry with christians but more are angry at God.No it isn't. Don't confuse anger with god's followers as anger with god.
So you’ll accept “most” or “many” are but not “all?”You mean hypothesis and you can disprove it by finding one atheist who is not angry at God.
Me, for one.
Hypothesis disconfirmed.
Why does the definition of information change for DNA besides the desire of atheists to use semantics?If you're looking for a definition of information as used with respect to DNA, it depends.
That’s like saying the information in a recipie is counted by the number of words used. Of what use is this? Does it render it “not information?”Most of the time even in scientific papers, the term information is used in a somewhat colloquial fashion. Often it just refers to the base pair sequences themselves. The measure of information would just be the number of base pairs. The formation of any novel sequences (via mutations for example) would be an example of the formation of new information.
Is there a specific threshold in quantification results that render it either information or not information?Now there are other cases where information is used in the context of information theory and how that has been applied to DNA. (See here for example: Application of information theory to DNA sequence analysis: A review - ScienceDirect). In those contexts the definitions and quantification of information are mathematical in nature.
So it’s all information no matter what?However even in the latter cases, there is nothing strictly prohibiting the formation of new, measurable information in DNA via observed mechanisms that alter DNA sequences over time.
Except how do mindless processes produce information in the first place? There’s nothing that says mindless water running over a page cannot change the information on a document. Doesn’t explain how the information got there in the first place.There is nothing to suggest that the only way information in DNA sequences can arise is from deliberate, intelligent editing of DNA sequences.
Single cell life forms aren’t modern and that’s the only kind he could have hoped to show.That's not how science works. The conclusions that Pasteur made were in relation to modern life forms not spontaneously arising.
Some faith is hard to kill no matter what science is provided.Such conclusions are provisional, not a blanket statement forever prohibiting life arising from non-life.
Except we KNOW it cannot have done so by all observed scientific research. Faith, of course, doesn’t need to heed science if there are stronger reasons for believing. Depends upon the heart.The original life on Earth would have had to arisen from non-life. Such a process would involve organic chemistry.
Yes it is very common. I could comb through posts to show you few are angry with christians but more are angry at God.
At last, my dream is fulfilled.You mean hypothesis and you can disprove it by finding one atheist who is not angry at God.
Me, for one.
Hypothesis disconfirmed.
It is indeed. My observations lead me to that (I am duly corrected) hypothesis. Why people should be angry at a Being they do not believe in makes no sense to me.That's silly.
Why does the definition of information change for DNA besides the desire of atheists to use semantics?
That’s like saying the information in a recipie is counted by the number of words used. Of what use is this? Does it render it “not information?”
Is there a specific threshold in quantification results that render it either information or not information? So it’s all information no matter what?
Except how do mindless processes produce information in the first place? There’s nothing that says mindless water running over a page cannot change the information on a document. Doesn’t explain how the information got there in the first place.
Single cell life forms aren’t modern and that’s the only kind he could have hoped to show.
Some faith is hard to kill no matter what science is provided.
Except we KNOW it cannot have done so by all observed scientific research. Faith, of course, doesn’t need to heed science if there are stronger reasons for believing. Depends upon the heart.
It is indeed. My observations lead me to that (I am duly corrected) hypothesis. Why people should be angry at a Being they do not believe in makes no sense to me.
You live a sheltered life. Go on an atheist blog and pretend to be a Christian. You probably have gleaned enough to fake it. See how that works for you.I've yet to see it. I have, however, seen a lot of false accusations of it from christians.
You live a sheltered life. Go on an atheist blog and pretend to be a Christian. You probably have gleaned enough to fake it. See how that works for you.
Oh yes it does. Talk about any subject you like except anything to do with God. Watch the hackles rise and the fur fly.....How atheists treat you has no bearing on whether or not they are mad at god.
Oh yes it does. Talk about any subject you like except anything to do with God. Watch the hackles rise and the fur fly.....
Information is measure in "bits."Can you provide an example of quantified or measured information? What ruler or units are used to do this?
No. "Information" is a way of characterizing patterns of physical entities--in the case of your example, the sound patterns of speech. Any speech utterance contains information, but then, so does the white noise coming off the cooling fan ii your computer.I can assume that you can do this for us right? Other than the longest “word” known, I’ve never heard of the units used to quantify DNA information. How does being able to measure the quantity of information render it non-information? If a man testified as to a crime, does the jury have to quantify that information before they KNOW it is information?
Oh yes it does. Talk about any subject you like except anything to do with God. Watch the hackles rise and the fur fly.....
It appears that you believe 1. That there is there a supernatural entity of some kind which is responsible for the existence of the universe, and 2. That science can be relied upon to give us reasonably accurate explanations for material phenomena such as the age of the universe, the origin of species, etc. Is that right?God created the universe so he does not "live" in the universe but rather separate to it. If the universe were to fold up God doesn't fold up with it. Science is based on the laws within the universe not outside so science can measure everything inside the universe but nothing outside and it is outside where the mystery of the existence of God is. This also means God is not measured by things like space time and matter but is above these things. Science can disprove or prove things like a yeti because yetis are based in the universe. but science does not have the capacity to peek outside of the universe and obverse God as it needs to observe things based on space/time (inside the universe) otherwise according to science it doesn't exist. Science can neither prove nor disprove God it can only say within the space time continuum it cannot find God.
Actually I can. Pretty amazing that you assume what I cannot do. That you don’t see it doesn’t mean it’s not there.No. You really can't. If you find anger at god, they aren't atheists. I suspect most of what you would post, however, is indeed equating anger at christians with anger at god, despite your claim otherwise..
Not convinced you guys could detect the anger if you read it.How atheists treat you has no bearing on whether or not they are mad at god. Or at the very least is not indicative of said anger.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?