Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
So that Abraham's seed could come to fulfillment. Jesus Christ of Nazareth.Why would God protect her from Satan two times if she was just going to turn into Babylon anyways?
So that Abraham's seed could come to fulfillment. Jesus Christ of Nazareth.
Not following your reasoning. I am not a Dispensational Futurist so we will go round and round on this.That happened before she was protected two times so God saved her because she is not a harlot but is faithful. There is zero evidence for her abandoning God. She is so protected by God Satan is forced to go after the remnant of her seed instead of her.
Not following your reasoning. I am not a Dispensational Futurist so we will go round and round on this.
Blessings
You will need to do a bit more research on the "woman" starting with the Old Testament. Revelation quotes from the OT much of the time. Faithful Israel are Christians in the Body of Christ.The details of the text do not support your reasoning regarding Christ. After Christ Ascended, this woman is protected two different times. Again, no evidence that this woman ever abandons God. Everything we know of her is she is faithful and loved by God and this is after the ascension of Christ. She must represent faithful Israel not apostate Israel.
You will need to do a bit more research on the "woman" starting with the Old Testament. Revelation quotes from the OT much of the time. Faithful Israel are Christians in the Body of Christ.
Ok, but I do not agree, so we will leave it at that.All research concludes that the woman in Rev 12 is not a harlot in any sense. It's not Apostate Israel nor Jerusalem.
Rev 12:17 And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.
God loves this woman and the dragon hates her. That alone proves your theory about her to be wrong.
Yes it does.
Rev_9:12 One woe is past; and, behold, there come two woes more hereafter.
Rev_11:14 The second woe is past; and, behold, the third woe cometh quickly.
All speaking of the 3 woe trumpets.
In Revelation 11:18, that wrath is God's wrath, I agree. But God's wrath is not described as woe to the inhabiters of the earth (Revelation 8:13), like Satan's wrath is in Revelation 12:12.
I think that Satan's wrath is over the course of the time, times, half time when Satan is a terror (from Ezekiel 28:19). Anyone not worshiping Satan cloaked in the abomination of desolation statue image the false prophet orders killed (Revelation 13:15).
God's wrath, during the same period, is in the bowls of wrath poured out on the earth, and the seat of the beast and his kingdom (Revelation 16:10) which Satan gives power to the beast (Revelation 13:4).
Pre-trib - is more accurately pre-70th week, because them holding the view assert that the 70th week is the tribulation period in their vocabulary. I don't use the term the tribulation or the tribulation period. I am just pointing out what the proponents of the pre-trib and mid-trib views are basing their terminology.There would be no reason for 1 Thessalonians 4:13-17 to be occurring in the middle of the 70th week. That's Pretrib, regardless that some might call it midtrib instead. Obviously the GT is the last half of the 70th week, and if the resurrection of the dead and the rapture of the church take place somewhere around the middle of the 70th week, that is Pretrib, thus there is no such thing as midtrib, as if midtrib were different than pretrib somehow.
Why not? The last of the bowls of God's wrath, will be just before Jesus descends to the earth.Except I don't see the bowls of wrath occurring during a time, times, and the dividing of time.
It said to be the time of the judgment of the dead. Which would mean that a resurrection has taken place. What it doesn't identify is when that resurrection will have happened.And besides, if once the trump has sounded, and that it is then said to be the time of the dead, that implies a resurrection. There would be no reason for 1 Thessalonians 4:13-17 to be occurring in the middle of the 70th week.
Here's a question I would like to get opinions on from non Premils. In Revelation 12:2-17, roughly how much time do you conclude all of that covers?
It begins with a history lesson containing the fall of Satan, and the wicked angels who followed him.
I'm uncertain what you mean here. Are you meaning the war in heaven occurred before God even made man in the beginning? Once satan and his angels are cast out, satan then finds himself cast unto the earth at the time, having great wrath because he knows he has but a short time. What I deduce from the text, the war in heaven has to occur around the same timeframe, and not thousands of years earlier instead.
We do not know exactly when Satan fell, but it would have to be after the creation.
Some people on this forum think Satan is still in the third heaven, in the presence of God.
The two verse below prove otherwise.
2Pe_2:4 For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment;
Jud_1:6 And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.
BABerean2 said: ↑
It begins with a history lesson containing the fall of Satan, and the wicked angels who followed him.
DavidPT said: ↑
I'm uncertain what you mean here. Are you meaning the war in heaven occurred before God even made man in the beginning? Once satan and his angels are cast out, satan then finds himself cast unto the earth at the time, having great wrath because he knows he has but a short time. What I deduce from the text, the war in heaven has to occur around the same timeframe, and not thousands of years earlier instead.
Would make for a good discussion........We do not know exactly when Satan fell, but it would have to be after the creation.
Some people on this forum think Satan is still in the third heaven, in the presence of God.
The two verse below prove otherwise.
2Pe_2:4 For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment;
Jud_1:6 And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.
The wicked angels are now denied the light of God's glory.
Rev 21:23 And the city had no need of the sun, neither of the moon, to shine in it: for the glory of God did lighten it, and the Lamb is the light thereof.
The 7 TRUMPETS of REVELATION STUDYDan 8:10 And it grew up to the host of heaven; and it cast down some of the host and some of the stars to the ground, and trampled them.
Dan 8:13 Then I heard a holy one speaking; and another holy one said to that certain one who was speaking, “How long will the vision be, concerning the daily sacrifices and the transgression of desolation, the giving of both the sanctuary and the host to be trampled underfoot?”
It begins with a history lesson containing the fall of Satan, and the wicked angels who followed him.
It makes reference to the birth, and death of Christ.
It runs up through the persecution of the New Covenant Church, right before the return of Christ.
Since it appears you think Revelation 12:2-17 spans at least 2000 years, and that you believe satan's thousand year binding fits during this same 2000 years, can you point out where in Revelation 12:2-17 that Revelation 20:1-3 initially fits? Of the 16 verses in Revelation 12:2-17, between which verses do you propose Revelation 20:1-3 initially fits, as in when the beginning of the thousand year binding starts?
((Does Revelation 20:1-3 initially start here?))
Revelation 12:2 And she being with child cried, travailing in birth, and pained to be delivered.
((Does Revelation 20:1-3 initially start here?))
3 And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads.
((Does Revelation 20:1-3 initially start here?))
4 And his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth: and the dragon stood before the woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born.
((Does Revelation 20:1-3 initially start here?))
5 And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron: and her child was caught up unto God, and to his throne.
((Does Revelation 20:1-3 initially start here?))
6 And the woman fled into the wilderness, where she hath a place prepared of God, that they should feed her there a thousand two hundred and threescore days.
((Does Revelation 20:1-3 initially start here?))
7 And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,
8 And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven.
((Does Revelation 20:1-3 initially start here?))
9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
((Does Revelation 20:1-3 initially start here?))
10 And I heard a loud voice saying in heaven, Now is come salvation, and strength, and the kingdom of our God, and the power of his Christ: for the accuser of our brethren is cast down, which accused them before our God day and night.
((Does Revelation 20:1-3 initially start here?))
11 And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony; and they loved not their lives unto the death.
((Does Revelation 20:1-3 initially start here?))
12Therefore rejoice, ye heavens, and ye that dwell in them. Woe to the inhabiters of the earth and of the sea! for the devil is come down unto you, having great wrath, because he knoweth that he hath but a short time.
((Does Revelation 20:1-3 initially start here?))
13 And when the dragon saw that he was cast unto the earth, he persecuted the woman which brought forth the man child.
((Does Revelation 20:1-3 initially start here?))
14 And to the woman were given two wings of a great eagle, that she might fly into the wilderness, into her place, where she is nourished for a time, and times, and half a time, from the face of the serpent.
((Does Revelation 20:1-3 initially start here?))
15 And the serpent cast out of his mouth water as a flood after the woman, that he might cause her to be carried away of the flood.
((Does Revelation 20:1-3 initially start here?))
16 And the earth helped the woman, and the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed up the flood which the dragon cast out of his mouth.
((Does Revelation 20:1-3 initially start here?))
17 And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.
((Does Revelation 20:1-3 initially start here?))
It is my belief they cannot be compared in the way you are attempting.
If one were Premil, this would be true. But why should it be true of Amil as well? If Revelation 12:2-17 covers at least 2000 years, and that Amils' proposed thousand years covers this same 2000 years, why then can't Amil show in Revelation 12:2-17 exactly where satan's thousand year binding starts, and while I'm thinking about it, also where in the text his thousand year binding ends and his little season begins? Why would that be an unreasonable request? It's Amils who are claiming satan is bound in this age and that it equals from the time of the cross until when satans little season begins. Revelation 12:2-17 also covers that same time period.
Revelation 12:12 Therefore rejoice, ye heavens, and ye that dwell in them. Woe to the inhabiters of the earth and of the sea! for the devil is come down unto you, having great wrath, because he knoweth that he hath but a short time.
Assuming satan is bound in this age, followed by his little season, well it would seem to me then, that this short time would be meaning the little season after the thousand years. That would have to place satan's thousand year binding during the time before he is cast out of heaven unto the earth. Even that can't work. Especially when some people view satan as having been cast unto the earth around the time of Christ's ascension back into heaven. That would make this short time the thousand years rather than his little season.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?