• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Are all Bibles Created Equal?

Deadworm

Well-Known Member
May 26, 2016
1,061
714
78
Colville, WA 99114
✟83,313.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
The modern critical text used by recent translations is based on the new science of Text Criticism (TC). This science uses rock solid principles to discover the most original text. e. g.

(1) Conflation: If a Byzantine text reads "grace" and "peace" and 2 earlier texts just read "grace" or "peace," then it is clear that a later scribe, uncertain about which word to choose, included both in a conflated phrase.
(2) Often later texts try to clarify ambiguities in the original text. So the "harder reading" is often to be preferred.
(3) Often the later additions clash with the Hebrew or Greek style of the original and gave the error away that way.
(4) Before there were complete NT manuscripts, there were early Church Fathers, who quoted NT texts. So these patristic texts are another way of assessing the accuracy of the earlier translations. Also, the early Church Father (e. g. Origen) sometimes comments on what the earliest texts say, to the detriment of the text underlying the KJV.
(5) The ability to group biblical manuscripts into families by text type, region, and date often allows text critics to identify where, why, and when errors crept into the text.

The result of this scholarship is a demonstration of the relatively corrupt nature of the Textus Receptus and the texts used by the KJV, for which the best and earliest manuscripts were not available. Again, I pose the question: Why do those of you who pride yourself in your "high" view of biblical inspiration choose to use the most corrupt Bible version?
 
Upvote 0

66/40

Active Member
Mar 6, 2016
103
82
I banned this website
✟4,969.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Constitution
I think people get too festered up with bible translations as a whole. Every year I read a different translation between the Geneva-1599, KJV-1873, KJV-1611 (2nd ed), NIV-1984, NKJV, and NASB. Six bibles rotated every six years. There are bibles I won't read however like the cult bibles (KJV-Smith inspired, NWT (JW's), The Message, NLT etc...). Out of the six I rotate, I feel that they are all worthy of being God's Word.

I rotate between bibles because I like to change the writing style, syntax and cadence of the English language I'm reading from. Plain and simple.
 
Upvote 0

benelchi

INACTIVE
Aug 3, 2011
693
140
✟25,298.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Anyone can find extreme examples. And that is not what I am talking about and frankly you know it.

What I know is the example I provided was not an extreme example but rather it is reflective of the norm, and it demonstrates why using a lexicon and a concordance to "back translate" the text is so error prone.
 
Upvote 0

Winken

Heimat
Site Supporter
Sep 24, 2010
5,709
3,505
✟213,877.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

Daniel 3:25 should be "the Son of God." Otherwise I don't see anything significant.
 
Upvote 0

Dr Bruce Atkinson

Supporter
Site Supporter
Feb 19, 2013
737
375
Atlanta, GA
✟88,038.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
All Bibles may not be created equal and certainly all translators are not equal in ability and discernment from the Holy Spirit. However, this is not really a problem. Any reasonable person can compare these versions (along with many other English translations) and come up with a very good understanding of what God is revealing to us. On any essential doctrines, you will find minimal disagreement among translations or among traditional interpretations over the course of 2000 years. Only lately can you find lots of heterodox interpretations which are due to those who believe too much in cultural and secular values. When the early Church Fathers, the Roman Catholic Church, the Eastern Orthodox Church, and the Reformers all agree, you can "take it to the bank" so to speak. Where they do not agree, go with the interpretations where the majority of these agree. Google St. Vincent's Canon. And check out the following article:
http://www.virtueonline.org/translations-bible-issue-language
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,148
EST
✟1,123,613.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
See, we wont even agree on what is being said here..... What WORD? The Tanakh (more specifically the Torah)
I'm not so sure about that.
Here from the Jewish Encyclopedia, part of the article on “Memra,” the Aramaic word for “word.” The Targums were Aramaic translations of the O.T., during the Babylonian captivity about 700 BC.
Here in this citation there are at least eighty examples where the name of YHWH was replaced, in the Targums, with “memra.” When the Jew John said to his Jewish audience, “In the beginning was the Word.” he was not saying anything new.

Jewish Encyclopedia Memra-In the Targum:
In the Targum the Memra figures constantly as the manifestation of the divine power, or as God's messenger in place of God Himself, wherever the predicate is not in conformity with the dignity or the spirituality of the Deity.
Instead of the Scriptural "You have not believed in the Lord," Targ. Deut. i. 32 has "You have not believed in the word of the Lord"; instead of "I shall require it [vengeance] from him," Targ. Deut. xviii. 19 has "My word shall require it." "The Memra," instead of "the Lord," is "the consuming fire" (Targ. Deut. ix. 3; comp. Targ. Isa. xxx. 27). The Memra "plagued the people" (Targ. Yer. to Ex. xxxii. 35). "The Memra smote him" (II Sam. vi. 7; comp. Targ. I Kings xviii. 24; Hos. xiii. 14; et al.). Not "God," but "the Memra," is met with in Targ. Ex. xix. 17 (Targ. Yer. "the Shekinah"; comp. Targ. Ex. xxv. 22: "I will order My Memra to be there"). "I will cover thee with My Memra," instead of "My hand" (Targ. Ex. xxxiii. 22). Instead of "My soul," "My Memra shall reject you" (Targ. Lev. xxvi. 30; comp. Isa. i. 14, xlii. 1; Jer. vi. 8; Ezek. xxiii. 18). "The voice of the Memra," instead of "God," is heard (Gen. iii. 8; Deut. iv. 33, 36; v. 21; Isa. vi. 8; et al.). Where Moses says, "I stood between the Lord and you" (Deut. v. 5), the Targum has, "between the Memra of the Lord and you"; and the "sign between Me and you" becomes a "sign between My Memra and you" (Ex. xxxi. 13, 17; comp. Lev. xxvi. 46; Gen. ix. 12; xvii. 2, 7, 10; Ezek. xx. 12). Instead of God, the Memra comes to Abimelek (Gen. xx. 3), and to Balaam (Num. xxiii. 4). His Memra aids and accompanies Israel, performing wonders for them (Targ. Num. xxiii. 21; Deut. i. 30, xxxiii. 3; Targ. Isa. lxiii. 14; Jer. xxxi. 1; Hos. ix. 10 [comp. xi. 3, "the messenger-angel"]). The Memra goes before Cyrus (Isa. xlv. 12). The Lord swears by His Memra (Gen. xxi. 23, xxii. 16, xxiv. 3; Ex. xxxii. 13; Num. xiv. 30; Isa. xlv. 23; Ezek. xx. 5; et al.). It is His Memra that repents (Targ. Gen. vi. 6, viii. 21; I Sam. xv. 11, 35). "Not His 'hand,' but His "Memra has laid the foundation of the earth" (Targ. Isa. xlviii. 13); for His Memra's or Name's sake does He act (l.c. xlviii. 11; II Kings xix. 34). Through the Memra God turns to His people (Targ. Lev. xxvi. 90; II Kings xiii. 23), becomes the shield of Abraham (Gen. xv. 1), and is with Moses (Ex. iii. 12; iv. 12, 15) and with Israel (Targ. Yer. to Num. x. 35, 36; Isa. lxiii. 14). It is the Memra, not God Himself, against whom man offends
(Ex. xvi. 8; Num. xiv. 5; I Kings viii. 50; II Kings xix. 28; Isa. i. 2, 16; xlv. 3, 20; Hos. v. 7, vi. 7; Targ. Yer. to Lev. v. 21, vi. 2; Deut. v. 11); through His Memra Israel shall be justified (Targ. Isa. xlv. 25); with the Memra Israel stands in communion (Targ. Josh. xxii. 24, 27); in the Memra man puts his trust (Targ. Gen. xv. 6; Targ. Yer. to Ex. xiv. 31; Jer. xxxix. 18, xlix. 11).
MEMRA - JewishEncyclopedia.com
 
Upvote 0

SacredwriterNorth

SacredwriterNorth
Jan 29, 2017
1
1
87
International Falls MN 56649
✟23,211.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Republican
All this discussion hurts me to view. Let me be plain, and perhaps very non-religious PC on this matter: God is in charge, it is my firm belief after nearly 8 decades of spiritual growth, that He would not allow an erroneous Word to gain acceptance by the Body. I grew up on the KJV, and after a lengthy relationship, shifted to the Amplified with great confidence in the choice.... and now we have the NET, which in my eyes, is probably as close to the meaning of the original transcripts and copies that are relevant that we we achieve. In the movie Bull Durham, the coach is lecturing the baseball team about the sport. In anger, he says, "it is a simple game.... "you hits the ball, you catches the ball, you throws the ball"... We are pulling away from the dock of life in the Boat USS Intellect, when we should be boarding the USS Jesus Christ. To paraphrase the baseball coach's comments: It is a simple matter, you hears the Word, you believes the Word, you acts on the Word.... How deep do we have to go to determine "Truth"... it is hitting us in the nose, and we just don't seem to be happy until we make a mountain out of it... I love higher criticism, and as a writer, love to see the historical and literary aspects of the Bible excavated... but we will NOT stand before the Throne of Judgement and be asked to outline4 the Christological elements of the Old Testament, or explain the Book of Hebrews... the inquiry will be a simple one.... Faith, Love, Walk, Growth, commitment etc. We need to take a collective breath, perhaps, and listen to Him, tune up our beliefs, and let the Holy Spirit speak to us through what we believe to be His Word... NT or OT, it is His Word... Be quiet and listen. For your soul's sake.

Dr. Gene Emahiser, International Falls Mn
 
Reactions: Shane R
Upvote 0

Dr Bruce Atkinson

Supporter
Site Supporter
Feb 19, 2013
737
375
Atlanta, GA
✟88,038.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Ad hominem fallacy: it's not relevant if they are followers of Darwin or not.
It certainly tells you something about their judgment and about their general view of the scriptures (as less than authoritative).
 
Upvote 0

Dr Bruce Atkinson

Supporter
Site Supporter
Feb 19, 2013
737
375
Atlanta, GA
✟88,038.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

Good advice ... to which I completely agree.
 
Upvote 0

BukiRob

Newbie
Dec 14, 2012
2,809
1,006
Columbus, Ohio
✟68,065.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
◄ 3056. logos ►


III. In several passages in the writings of John ὁ λόγος denotes the essential Word of God, i. e. the personal (hypostatic) wisdom and power in union with God, his minister in the creation and government of the universe, the cause of all the world's life both physical and ethical, which for the procurement of man's salvation put on human nature in the person of Jesus the Messiah and shone forth conspicuously from his words and deeds: John 1:1, 14;
 
Upvote 0

BukiRob

Newbie
Dec 14, 2012
2,809
1,006
Columbus, Ohio
✟68,065.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution


If you ignore the Jewishness of the writing style and culture of the authors, if you do not know the multitude of idioms found all through scripture, if you do not view the NT in light of the OT you are prone to making numerous errors.
 
Upvote 0

benelchi

INACTIVE
Aug 3, 2011
693
140
✟25,298.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
If you ignore the Jewishness of the writing style and culture of the authors, if you do not know the multitude of idioms found all through scripture, if you do not view the NT in light of the OT you are prone to making numerous errors.
 
Upvote 0