• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Approaches to Eschatology

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟916,165.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

Is there some reason you left out New Covenant Theology?


The New Covenant: Bob George

.
 
Upvote 0

Douggg

anytime rapture, non-dispensationalist, futurist
May 28, 2009
30,042
3,568
Non-dispensationalist
✟415,889.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Actually, this was taught, and clearly taught, in some of the very oldest Christian commentaries on Bible prophecy. And continued to be taught at least up to the fifth century.
James, I disagree with the principle, since...

Revelation 13:8 And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.

...I maintain there is one way that God relates to man, even before man was created.
 
Upvote 0

Biblewriter

Senior Member
Site Supporter
May 15, 2005
11,935
1,498
Ocala, Florida
Visit site
✟554,225.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives

The scriptures indeed explicitly say that Christ is the heir of all things. But they most absolutely never say anything even approaching saying that He is "the sole and exclusive heir of all things." Indeed, they explicitly say the very opposite, that
16 The Spirit Himself bears witness with our spirit that we are children of God, 17 and if children, then heirs--heirs of God and joint heirs with Christ, if indeed we suffer with Him, that we may also be glorified together. Romans 8:16-17

As for your rant, about wills, you are only using human reasoning in a vain attempt to escape the explicitly stated words of God.
 
Upvote 0

Biblewriter

Senior Member
Site Supporter
May 15, 2005
11,935
1,498
Ocala, Florida
Visit site
✟554,225.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Is there some reason you left out New Covenant Theology?


The New Covenant: Bob George

.
That is just a "sub-ism" of Covenant Theology.
 
Upvote 0

Biblewriter

Senior Member
Site Supporter
May 15, 2005
11,935
1,498
Ocala, Florida
Visit site
✟554,225.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives

Did God continue to walk and talk with men after He expelled Adam and Eve from the garden?
 
Upvote 0

Biblewriter

Senior Member
Site Supporter
May 15, 2005
11,935
1,498
Ocala, Florida
Visit site
✟554,225.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives

Actually, we do indeed take both "near" and "soon" to mean exactly what God said. These are relative terms. And I answer, relative to what? You insist it is relative to mankind, and I answer it is relative to God. So we indeed take these words to literally mean what they actually said.

But an explicit statement of a period of time is not a relative term. To change an explicit statement of time, stated six times over in just six verses, into a relative term, is to claim it does not mean what it actually said.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Douggg

anytime rapture, non-dispensationalist, futurist
May 28, 2009
30,042
3,568
Non-dispensationalist
✟415,889.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Did God continue to walk and talk with men after He expelled Adam and Eve from the garden?
Genesis 5:24. But obviously things changed for man after Adam and Eve sinned. God has never changed though. Sin separates man from God. There is only one way for any man that brings man back into relationship with God like before the fall, and even better, and that is by the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Biblewriter

Senior Member
Site Supporter
May 15, 2005
11,935
1,498
Ocala, Florida
Visit site
✟554,225.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Things did not just change for man at that time. God also changed the way He related to mankind.

Another such change is explicitly stated.

30 Truly, these times of ignorance God overlooked, but now commands all men everywhere to repent, Acts 17:30
 
Upvote 0

Biblewriter

Senior Member
Site Supporter
May 15, 2005
11,935
1,498
Ocala, Florida
Visit site
✟554,225.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Absolutely not.


What is New Covenant Theology?


Pastor Douglas Goodin


.

Very, well, tell us the difference, in your own words. By now you should know that no one listens to the many videos you keep posting.
 
Reactions: Douggg
Upvote 0

Douggg

anytime rapture, non-dispensationalist, futurist
May 28, 2009
30,042
3,568
Non-dispensationalist
✟415,889.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Things did not just change for man at that time. God also changed the way He related to mankind.

Another such change is explicitly stated.

30 Truly, these times of ignorance God overlooked, but now commands all men everywhere to repent, Acts 17:30
I meant Genesis 5:24. I corrected my post.

Nonetheless, to the actual point your are making. God never changed that sin separates man from God. And every man is redeemed from sin, and the broken relationship by one way, that has never changed even before man was created.

As far as eschatology is concerned, there is no reason to introduce the doctrine of dispensationalism. Just as there is no reason to bring up New Covenant theology.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

jgr

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 25, 2008
9,692
5,020
✟843,047.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married

Christ is the Heir of all things, making Him the sole and exclusive Heir.

He then in grace and mercy declares through the Spirit that we who are in Him share what the Father has bequeathed Him, as joint-heirs.

The only Israel who are joint-heirs are the Israel who are in Him.

As He has declared in His New Will and Testament.

It's a privilege to rant the Word of God.
 
Reactions: keras
Upvote 0

Biblewriter

Senior Member
Site Supporter
May 15, 2005
11,935
1,498
Ocala, Florida
Visit site
✟554,225.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
And He has just as explicitly stated that all of the descendants of the ancient twelve tribes of Israel who survive to that time will eventually be brought to repentance, and thus be blessed through the "new will and testament," even though that is a term totally foreign to scripture.
 
Upvote 0

Biblewriter

Senior Member
Site Supporter
May 15, 2005
11,935
1,498
Ocala, Florida
Visit site
✟554,225.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives

This is absolutely correct. But God has indeed changed the details of how we are to approach Him. In the past, He required the sacrifices of animals. Now He does not even accept such sacrifices.
As far as eschatology is concerned, there is no reason to introduce the doctrine of dispensationalism. Just as there is no reason to bring up New Covenant theology.

I bring up Dispensationalism simply because that is the label men have pasted on a simple belief that God is indeed going to keep all the ancient promised He made.
 
Upvote 0

jgr

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 25, 2008
9,692
5,020
✟843,047.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married

Hebrews 9
15 And for this cause he is the mediator of the new testament, that by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions that were under the first testament, they which are called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance.
16 For where a testament is, there must also of necessity be the death of the testator.
17 For a testament is of force after men are dead: otherwise it is of no strength at all while the testator liveth.

A testament which is of force after men are dead is also known as a will.

What do you think it is?
 
Upvote 0

Douggg

anytime rapture, non-dispensationalist, futurist
May 28, 2009
30,042
3,568
Non-dispensationalist
✟415,889.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
The issue of the doctrine of Dispenationalism is not a priority topic for me. I think New Covenant theogy persons are focused on it though. And their objection to dispensationalism bleeds over into so many threads, it seems.

I focus on eschatology from the futurist frame of reference.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Biblewriter

Senior Member
Site Supporter
May 15, 2005
11,935
1,498
Ocala, Florida
Visit site
✟554,225.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Scripture?
I have quoted the scripture for this here many times.

When Israel finally sees their long awaited Messiah, “one will say to him, ‘What are these wounds between your arms?’ Then he will answer, ‘Those with which I was wounded in the house of my friends.’ (Zechariah 13:6) The result is that “In that day there shall be a great mourning in Jerusalem, like the mourning at Hadad Rimmon in the plain of Megiddo. And the land shall mourn, every family by itself: the family of the house of David by itself, and their wives by themselves; the family of the house of Nathan by itself, and their wives by themselves; the family of the house of Levi by itself, and their wives by themselves; the family of Shimei by itself, and their wives by themselves; all the families that remain, every family by itself, and their wives by themselves.” (Zechariah 12:11-14)

"And it shall come to pass that he who is left in Zion and remains in Jerusalem will be called holy--everyone who is recorded among the living in Jerusalem." (Isaiah 4:3)

" 'And it shall come to pass in all the land,' Says the LORD, 'That two-thirds in it shall be cut off and die, But one-third shall be left in it: I will bring the one-third through the fire, Will refine them as silver is refined, And test them as gold is tested. They will call on My name, And I will answer them. I will say, 'This is My people'; And each one will say, 'The LORD is my God.' " (Zechariah 13:8-9)

Again, we read, “Then I will give them a heart to know Me, that I am the LORD; and they shall be My people, and I will be their God, for they shall return to Me with their whole heart.” (Jeremiah 24:7) “And so all Israel will be saved” (Romans 11:26)

And the fact that this restoration will include absolutely all of them is explicitly stated in Ezekiel 36:10.
 
Upvote 0

jgr

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 25, 2008
9,692
5,020
✟843,047.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married

Two Israels.

Romans 9
6
Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel:
7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called.
8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.

Of Israel:
Not all Israel
The children of the flesh
Not the children of God
Not the children of the promise
Not counted for the seed

All Israel:
Not the children of the flesh
The children of God
The children of the promise
Counted for the seed

Romans 11
26
And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:

Only one Israel shall be saved.

All Israel.

The faithful obedient elect beloved foreknown remnant of Romans 11.
 
Upvote 0

parousia70

Livin' in yesterday's tomorrow
Site Supporter
Feb 24, 2002
15,559
4,834
59
Oregon
✟901,523.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Actually, we do indeed take both "near" and "soon" to mean exactly what God said. These are relative terms. And I answer, relative to what? You insist it is relative to mankind, and I answer it is relative to God.

Yet you have no scriptural mandate to do that.

Everytime scripture speaks about a time frame relevant to the fulfillment of prophesy, it is given to be understood by how time relates to men, NOT how time relates to God.

Philippians 2:19
But I trust in the Lord Jesus to send Timothy shortly unto you, that I also may be of good comfort, when I know your state.

Are you waiting for Timothy's SOON arrival to YOU?
When are you expecting Ol'e Tim to show up?
Tomorrow? Next Week? Next Month, next year?
Certainly "shortly" can't go beyond YOUR lifetime, if in fact this passage is written to and for YOU, right?

Is not this God Breathed scripture written TO and FOR you?
Are you, not the "you" in this passage to whom the HS has directed and inspired Paul to address this passage to?

If not why not?
Is not the Holy Spirit, through Paul, telling YOU in this passage that He Hopes Jesus will send Timothy to YOU Shortly??

Or, do you say this scripture ONLY relates, and is only applicable, to the 1st century Phillippians, and that Shortly, means, well... Shortly, as they understood it in human terms back then?

Genesis 7:1-4. There, God told Noah:

Enter the ark, you and all your household; for you alone I have seen to be righteous before Me in this time [generation]. You shall take with you of ever clean animal by sevens, a male and his female; and of the animals that are not clean two, a male and his female; also of the birds of the sky, by sevens, male and female, to keep offspring alive on the face of all the earth. For after seven more days, I will send rain on the earth forty days and forty nights; and I will blot our from the face of the land every living thing that I have made.

There are several things in this passage that should be noted. First, this is a prophecy of judgment. Secondly, God declared when the judgment, i.e., the rain, would start. Thirdly, He stated how long the rain would last. Fourthly, God spoke this to Noah, a man trapped in time. God was very specific as to when the rain would begin and to how long it would last. God told Noah that after seven days it would rain for forty days and nights. Now, our first question regarding this passage is not how we should interpret what God said, but how would Noah interpret what God said. Would he understand that God was outside time? That is to say, the references that God made concerning when the judgment would come were to be measured by how time relates to God? Applying the futurist’s interpretation of 2 Peter 3:8-9to this passage, was God telling Noah that after 7,000 years it would begin to rain and once it started raining, it would continue for 40,000 years? Or should the plain, everyday definitions of the terms be understood? We find our answer in verse’s 10 and 12:

And it came about after the seven days, that the water of the flood came upon the earth¼ And the rain fell upon the earth for forty days and forty nights.

Here, just a few short verses later, we have the fulfillment of that prophecy. This shows us that God meant exactly what He said to Noah. Seven days equaled seven days. Forty days and nights equaled forty days and nights.

In Ezekiel 12:21-28, it is written:

Then the word of the Lord came to me saying, "Son of man, what is this proverb you people have concerning the land of Israel, saying, ‘The days are long and every vision fails?’ Therefore say to them, ‘Thus says the Lord God, "I will make this proverb cease so that they will no longer use it as a proverb in Israel." But tell them, "The days a draw near as well as the fulfillment of every vision. For there will no longer be any false vision or flattering divination within the house of Israel. For I the Lord shall speak, and whatever word I speak will be performed. It will no longer be delayed, for in you days, O rebellious house, I shall speak the word and perform it," declares the Lord God.’ " Furthermore, the word of the Lord came to me saying, "Son of man, behold, the house of Israel is saying, ‘The vision that he sees is for many years from now, and he prophesies of times far off.’ Therefore say to them, ‘Thus says the Lord God, "None of My words will be delayed any longer. Whatever word I speak will be performed," ’ " declares the Lord God.

In this passage the nation of Israel said that the time statements of God’s word were irrelevant.

This is exactly what the futurist claims about the time statements concerning the coming of Christ in the first century. They say, just like Israel, "Those passages were not for the original audience but were ‘for many years from now’ and for ‘times far off.’ " But notice what God thinks about that kind of hermeneutic. God said, "None of My words will be delayed any longer. Whatever word I speak will be performed." He stated that He would say the word and He would perform it. Again, notice the implication of that statement. God Himself fulfills His word. When we try and say that the imminent time statements in the New Testament concerning Christ’s coming in the first century are really "for many years from now," i.e., our time, we are saying that God will not fulfill His word! So the real issue here is not just differences of interpretation concerning eschatology, but the nature and character of God. If the futurist is correct in his interpretation and application new testament time imminency statements (of which there are over 100), then God is made out to be a liar because He will not fulfill His word when He said He would. Plain and simple. If the futurist is correct, then we might as well be atheists because God Himself cannot even be trusted, and then we are lost. Why? Because, if God is dishonest concerning when He would fulfill His word, how do we know He was honest concerning the doctrines of Grace? Or anything else for that matter? It’s simple. We don’t. So, again, this is much more than just a difference of interpretation. Our salvation depends on God keeping every aspect of His word. Including when He was to fulfill it.

Conclusion

1. By letting scripture interpret Scripture, we can see that when God gives a time statement regarding when prophecy would be fulfilled, unless instructed otherwise, the plain meaning of the terms should be used.

2. By using historical documentation we can see that prophecies were fulfilled exactly when God said they would be.

3. That God Himself fulfills His word. And if He doesn’t fulfill it when He said He would, then "we are of all men most miserable."

Therefore, we have a historical, and more importantly, a Biblical interpretation of the time statements of prophecy. Unless otherwise stated, God intended the time statements of prophecy to be interpreted in their plain, everyday meaning. God is faithful to His word. He ALWAYS fulfills it WHEN He said He would.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0