Looking at Apostolic succession, other then Jesus teaching against man made tradition, are there other points that were direct teachings from Jesus against Apostolic succession? Would you say main points against would be Jesus teaching against manmade tradition and the verses in Bible about importance of Scripture? Any other main points thanks
"Apostolic Succession" presumes that the apostles laid hands on "bishops", who in turn laid hands on the next generation of bishops,
ad infinitum, therefore there was apostlic succession even to the present day.
Scripture reveals that there was no distinct class of "bishops" in the New Testament churches, but it is simply another term for elders, who are for all practical purposes shepherds of their churches.
The shepherds of the NT churches can rightly be called "pastors/elders/bishops", and those terms are used interchangeably in the NT.
There is never ONE SINGLE PASTOR in any New Testament Church, just as there is never ONE SINGLE BISHOP over many churches. Those are all man-made traditions, just as seminary training, and taking the titles of "Reverend", "Right Reverend", "Father", "Doctor", "Monsigneur", "Pope" are all in violation of Scripture. Christ said "All ye are BRETHREN", and that's how it is supposed to be.
Rather than apostolic succession, ideally God would raise up elders within churches who would (1) feed the flock, (2) warn the flock, and (3) take oversight of the flock (Acts 20:28-31; 1 Pet 5:1-4). But since man's traditions have trumped God's plan, we don't really see this in most churches.