Michelle, look. I will say these things one last time. Then I am going to give you [bless and do not curse]the opportunity to respond to my private email address. I am going to remove you from the Group because it can't help you- or rather, you won't let it help you. You will be welcome to return if you can satisfy me that you are willing to reject your irrationality and are willing to let us help you- and if we agree that the whole issue is, in fact, OCD.
Otherwise, addressing it in the context of a group about OCD would obviously be inappropriate.
As I see it, right now you don't want help. If you ever do- if you ever decide to deal with these issues rationally- you will be more than welcome to come back to the Group. But we're a group for the spiritual implications of OCD, not of willful irrationality.
If you didn't believe in God, you wouldn't be asking the question you ask below. People aren't concerned about the behavior of gods they don't believe exist.
Your "research" into whether or not there is a God would more correctly be called "obsessing." One does not determine what one believes through obsessing, or what is true, either. In fact, one cannot. Truth is not the goal of obsessing. The goal of obsessing is making the anxiety stop. Since the anxiety is caused by a broken brain and is not really about whether or not there is a God (which is why you demand an irrational standard of proof you wouldn't apply to anything else), no amount of obsessing will bring peace. Hence, your inability to decide whether or not there is a God. You're right; no amount of obsessing, and no number of arguments, would decide the matter for you, because it's not really about whether or not there is a God. It's about making the anxiety stop.
You may not want to believe that there is a God, but you do. People who do not believe in God do not fear going to hell. They do not ask whether the God they do not believe in will forgive them. Anyone who does has psychological issues which have nothing to do with atheism or agnosticism. It simply isn't rational.
Nor is it rational to demand 100% proof for whether or not there is a God- or for that matter, for anything else. We've tried over and over to get you to at least think rationally about that, but you refuse. You say that no amount of evidence would lead you to believe in God, and I believe you, because the issue isn't whether or not there is a God. The issue is to whether you can get rid of the anxiety by achieving a level of certainty which simply is not available for anything. It is impossible to prove anything to a 100% certainty.
If you are psychotic, I can't help you. I'm not qualified. If, as I believe, this entire matter is OCD, then I can help you only if you are willing to helped. But your refuse to let me help you. You insist on your obsessions. Yousimply ignore everything I or anyone else in the Group say and say the same things in responseover and over, repeating yourself in an endless cycle as if there were nobody else involved in the conversation but you.
You choose to think irrationally about the matter. You choose to demand an impossible standard of proof. You are therefore responsible for the result. We have done everything possible to convince you to think ratinally, but you simply refuse.
I do not believe that you even understand the arguments for and against the existence of God. But again, that's not really the issue. The issue is making the anxiety stop, and the only way to make the anxiety stop is to absolutely, conclusively, and once and for all achieve 100% proof that there either is or isn't a God. Or, alternatively, you can fight your OCD and accept that the anxiety isn't going to stop, and deal with the question rationally. You will never have 100% certainty in this life that there is a God, and you will never have 100% certainty that there isn't. You have to do what the rest of the human race does, and form your opinion on the basis of where you see the evidence leading you. Yes, it is possible to rationally consider the evidence and reach the conclusion that it is impossible to decide either way. But in that case, you need to accept what I am about to say next.
If you do not trust in Christ as your Savior, then no, you will not be forgiven for anything. You will go to hell. That risk comes with the territory if you end up being an agnostic. It is predicated on the assumption that, as St. Paul says in Romans 1, ample evidence exists of God's existence to satisfy anyone who asks the question in good faith.
That trust- faith- can come only as a gift, through the Word. But thatis a different thing from believing whether or not there is a God. Certainly faith is impossible unless you believe that God exists. But anybody can reach that conclusion by weighing the evidence. Again, it goes without saying that to require 100% evidence is to decide in advance not to believe that there is a God.
To the person who believes, all sins are forgiven without exception.
Not wanting to have a Christian threapist (but being willing to have a non-Christian one) isn't a matter where a question of forgiveness even arises. Like demanding 100% proof before you will accept that there is a God, it is simply another way of deciding in advance that you're not going to believe, not because of the evidence but because you just don't want to.
And if you don't want to, fine. But going to hell if you're wrong comes with the territory. Nobody makes you not want to.
> If I trust God to forgive me for not wanting the doubt to stop ( which do u think is OCD?) and not wanting to have a Christian therapist. Will he forgive me? I don't know why I want these things? Today I am going to try not to stress and hang on to Jesus. This isn't a promise to anyone but him.
No where is he telling me how to trust a God I barely believe exists. Secondly isn't he basically saying faith ( which is the same as trust, right) is a gift so why is he telling me to trust if he knows I wasn't given that gift?