i'm talking movies like troy, king arthur, alexander... they all seem to be comming out at the same time and is it turning into overkill? they're hardly ever historicaly correct anyway...
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
rosenherman said:Since the only thing most screen writers are able to come up with is junk. They use history to provide them with a plot. If it weren't for cartoons (Shrek) or these historical mega-dramas, I'd never go to the movies. Why should I pay to watch something I wouldn't watch on TV for free?
MEOMY said:YES!! ...and this is why... They all include the leading male actor giving an empowering speech to his army of men, bloody fight scenes, bad humor, and they're all 3 hours long. But, I enjoyed braveheart. Go figure.
ChrisWinston said:You see, you enjoyed Braveheart. What's to say another historical movie won't come along that you'll also enjoy? It wasn't in the box office, was made-for-tv, but the last movie I watched was Spartacus from the USA Network, came out last year. I have never seen the original so I watched this with great interest, I wanted to learn from it; even if it wasn't completely true I could get an idea about the time and events. The empowering speeches by Spartacus to his army of men, the bloody fight scenes and all 3 hours were part of what made it a decent movie. Without those the story very simply could not be told!
![]()