Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Ok. Let me go check it out.
I definitely don't agree with everything he says. But the genealogy of the King is the only part relevant to this conversation.It's like Alex Jones crossbred with Chuck Missler and they had a baby named Tim.
Read it for free here>>>
I definitely don't agree with everything he says. But the genealogy of the King is the only part relevant to this conversation.
Called by God in 1987 to be “him who has understanding” (Rev 13:18)
And???He's an AirForce Academy drop-out and book huckster from Aurora, Colorado. Runs his biz out of his house. It's a for profit enterprise, not a 501c3 not for profit and definitely not for prophet.
He has proclaimed himself to be the one that Rev 13:18 is referring to... you can smell the hubris from Denver.
This calls for wisdom: Let the one who has insight calculate the beast’s number, for it is man’s number, and his number is 666.
I definitely don't agree with everything he says. But the genealogy of the King is the only part relevant to this conversation.
No idea as I have never read the book. In his video he states that King Charles is a descendant of King David as well as Mohammed.Alright. So, on which specific page of Cohen's book is this genealogy you're referring to?
Alright. So, on which specific page of Cohen's book is this genealogy you're referring to?
It does not say fifth horseman. The rider on the pale horse was Death. That it says Hell followed with him does not mean that Hell is necessarily on a horse, as a fifth horseman. For one thing, it does not give the color of that presumed by you horse, nor that Hell "sat on a horse" like the four horsemen of the text.,Oh and what about that 5th horseman.
So if you don't even understand this... what does that say for the rest of your theory?It does not say fifth horseman. The rider on the pale horse was Death. That it says Hell followed with him does not mean that Hell is necessarily on a horse, as a fifth horseman. For one thing, it does not give the color of that presumed by you horse, nor that Hell "sat on a horse" like the four horsemen of the text.,
It could be John saw persons dying and entering hell in the wake of the rider on the pale horse as Death made his way across a fourth of the earth. They did go hand-n-hand though.
8 And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with sword, and with hunger, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth.
It does not say fifth horseman in the text. It does not say that Hell sat on a horse in the text. It does not refer to a fifth horse in the text. Nor any color. It does not say that Hell was a rider in the text.So if you don't even understand this... what does that say for the rest of your theory?
Yes there is a fifth... horseman... nor horse. Simple language skills.
Mr E, too blurry and small to read.
Here is the results when I clicked on that link...Here, Let Me Google That For You
Passive-aggressively teach your friends how to Google. For all those people who find it more convenient to ask you rather than search it themselves. Not associated with Google.googlethatforyou.com
The Genealogy from Adam to Queen Elizabeth
J. H Allen published a detailed overview of the tradition that Queen Elizabeth is a descendant of the daughter of King Zedekiah son of Josiah son of David. Included in his work was a full genealogy of Queen Elizabeth II. Allen stops earlier than thewww.academia.edu
Speaking only for myself, I would not waste my time reading it at all.Well, at least now I have another book to add to the very bottom of my eschatological book list ...
Speaking only for myself, I would not waste my time reading it at all.
oh...
I wasn't.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?