Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
So...... do you believe that God made Adam as a child, then left him alone for years and years, only to come back to him as he was an adult to make a suitable helper for him and have him name the animals?Straw-man arguments. Nobody claimed that Adam was a child when he married.
Nobody claimed Adam was a young child when he named the animals.
Nobody claimed that there was not a passage of time.
.
Insult noted.You asked where Adam came from. I answered your question. And when you indicated you didn't know where the Bible described Adam coming from the dust of the ground, I provided Genesis 2:7.If you reject what the Bible says and reject what God's creation says, I don't think any answer is going to satisfy you.
.
There was no rice on Noah's Ark.
The compounds that formed life came together because of their properties.
For example the phospholipid bilayer that forms a membrane around cells. The head of the lipid is hydrophilic but the tail is hydrophobic, this allows an fluid arrangement of the compounds which acts a barrier and holds form due to it's hydrophobicity in a solution.
In general terms chemicals react because inorder to lower there energy states and become more stable. The more unstable a atom/molecule, the more likely it is to spontaneously react with another atom/molecule.
This is very well shown in DNA and RNA. RNA is a highly unstable molecule, but reacts very easily and therefore is a good catalyst. Whereas DNA is very stable and does not react with ease.
The compounds that formed life came together because of their properties.
For example the phospholipid bilayer that forms a membrane around cells. The head of the lipid is hydrophilic but the tail is hydrophobic, this allows an fluid arrangement of the compounds which acts a barrier and holds form due to it's hydrophobicity in a solution.
In general terms chemicals react because inorder to lower there energy states and become more stable. The more unstable a atom/molecule, the more likely it is to spontaneously react with another atom/molecule.
This is very well shown in DNA and RNA. RNA is a highly unstable molecule, but reacts very easily and therefore is a good catalyst. Whereas DNA is very stable and does not react with ease.
You assert with total confidence that an improbable event simply could not happen.To (thompson24) I disagree; human knowledge of chemistry soundly denies what you espouse as an explanation
What if life is one of the rules of chemistry?
This proposition was once proposed formally in a book by Dean H. Kenyon and Gary Steinman but Dean Kenyon recanted the formal proposition (may not be a formal Hypothesis) in 1976 reportedly from a book by A.E. Wilder-Smith. This proposition was not consistent with the findings of that the co N-glycosidic bonding between nucleobases in the Double Helix where non-covalent.
These are old myths revived repeatedly If you need particulars, we can discuss this further. Life can not arise from natural chemistry.
Scientists have found a possible set of circumstances that allow for the natural self-production of biochemical compounds - which have even been found in space.
It is a fact that we all share a common ancestor with worms, wasps and wombats, onions, olives and oranutans.
You assert with total confidence that an improbable event simply could not happen.
Life really is chemistry - that alone is enough to suggest that, given favourable conditions, that life really can start from non-life.
Then we should have no grave yards. If life is merely chemistry in concert, and under favorable conditions that life could start from non life, why do we have so many dead people? The chemistry is there, and in perfect order (it worked great for that person all through their life). The only thing that is missing (according to a naturalistic viewpoint) is energy in the system. We should be able to tote around a couple of batteries and live forever (or at least a lot longer). But you and I both know it doesn't work that way.Life really is chemistry - that alone is enough to suggest that, given favourable conditions, that life really can start from non-life.
We can easily understand from the context that there was little time between God making man and woman, and the time from which they were expelled from the Garden. We know this because God had commanded them to "be fruitful and multiply, and fill the Earth and subdue it" yet they did not fulfil this simple and enjoyable command.
Then we should have no grave yards. If life is merely chemistry in concert, and under favorable conditions that life could start from non life, why do we have so many dead people? The chemistry is there, and in perfect order (it worked great for that person all through their life). The only thing that is missing (according to a naturalistic viewpoint) is energy in the system. We should be able to tote around a couple of batteries and live forever (or at least a lot longer). But you and I both know it doesn't work that way.
Then we should have no grave yards. If life is merely chemistry in concert, and under favorable conditions that life could start from non life, why do we have so many dead people? The chemistry is there, and in perfect order (it worked great for that person all through their life). The only thing that is missing (according to a naturalistic viewpoint) is energy in the system. We should be able to tote around a couple of batteries and live forever (or at least a lot longer). But you and I both know it doesn't work that way.
In Christ, GB
Tell me what's wrong with the logic trail there. Evolutionists constantly fall back on the Urey Miller experiment as proof that the necessary ingredients for life can arise, that all they need to do is arrange themselves in a life sustaining/replicating order, and add a shot of "energy" (whether it's electrical or some other form), and viola! Life! If we were to take a dead human, all the information is right there. It's in perfect order as it had to be for that person to survive for a moment, let alone a lifetime. Everything is there for life, minus the "energy".Please tell me you're joking.
Life really is chemistry - that alone is enough to suggest that, given favourable conditions, that life really can start from non-life.
Intersting! Do you recommend American Scientific Affiliation to learn about Christian views on science?
My firm belief and that backed up by current science is “God’s Word is the final authority”
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?