I addressed them in post #1, taking it a bit at at time
False. You copy/pasted from post #511 "Comparative Anatomy" portion of my post and instead of addressing the content of the comparative anatomy portion of the post presented to you, you responded with this: Now I know this is your favorite stalling tactic as you repeat it ad-nauseam.
Point out in your statement where the evidence is offered, based on the scientific method, for the HOW, the process (mutation and natural selection?) which produced all life we observe today from an alleged single life form of long ago.
You claimed that you addressed every point made from post #511.
Shall we find out how dishonest your statement is?
Here is what you did not include in post #1 that you are claiming you addressed.
From Post #511 in the previously closed thread.
The floor is yours to now address it.
B. Embryology conclusion- "Rathke looked at the development of frogs, salamanders, fish, birds, and mammals, and emphasized the similarities in the development of all these vertebrate groups. During his 40 years of embryological research, he described for the first time the vertebrate pharyngeal arches , which become the gill apparatus of fish but become the mammalian jaws and ears"
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK9974/
C. Evolutionary genetics- Four evolutionary forces (mutation, random genetic drift, natural selection, and gene flow) acting within and among populations cause micro-evolutionary change and these processes are sufficient to account for macro-evolutionary patterns, which arise in the longer term from the collective action of these forces. That is, given very long periods of time, the micro-evolutionary forces will eventually give rise to the macro-evolutionary patterns that characterize the higher taxonomic groups.
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/evolutionary-genetics/
D. DNA- "A mutation is a change in DNA, the hereditary material of life. An organism's DNA affects how it looks, how it behaves, and its physiology. So a change in an organism's DNA can cause changes in all aspects of its life."
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/evolutionary-genetics/
An example of the results of a genetic mutation would be the bipedal hips in Australopithecus
We can also see evidence of similarities between chimpanzees and humans in human chromosome #2
"All great apes apart from man have 24 pairs of chromosomes. There is therefore a hypothesis that the common ancestor of all great apes had 24 pairs of chromosomes and that the fusion of two of the ancestor's chromosomes created chromosome 2 in humans. The evidence for this hypothesis is very strong."
The analogous chromosomes (2p and 2q) in the non-human great apes can be shown, when laid end to end, to create an identical banding structure to the human chromosome 2
http://www.evolutionpages.com/chromosome_2.htm
E. The fossil record. If what we know from above is true, we will see transitional fossils in the fossil record. A prediction was made for the Tiktaalik fossil. The prediction was confirmed accurate.
http://tiktaalik.uchicago.edu/meetTik.html
There is also a massive transitional fossil record:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_transitional_fossils
F. Analyze your data and draw conclusions: After studying the evidence closely, it is determined that all life on earth is related. This happened by natural selection over millions of years and generations. Desirable traits are selected by natural selection based on the environment a population lives in.
G. Report your results. Was your hypothesis correct?
Yes
Now that I have demonstrated everything you left out and failed to address. Here is another opportunity to reconcile your incorrect claim of having addressed it.