Another poor response to ERV evidence for common ancestry by a creationist.

[Lion Hearted Man]

Each man must come to a conclusion in his own mind. That makes it personal.

Does 2+2=5 for you?

 

[pgp_protector]

Does 2+2=5 for you?

In a different math state past yes.

 

[Ration]

Then consider this a wake up call. You have no clue whatsoever or knowledge regarding the laws and forces and state before the flood.

Science does not go there. If what you have thought it did, it is false to the core.

What flood? There is no evidence of a worldwide flood. And I'm pretty sure the laws of physics didn't change about 4000 years ago along with this mythical flood.

 

[Incariol]

Evos wouldn't know actual science if it slapped them on the head. Instead they post mostly rhetoric, cynicism, blasphemy, present state past based belief models, would be cleverisms, and intellectual and moral fart festival material.

My point, QED.

 

[Lion Hearted Man]

In a different math state past yes.

That explains everything!

 

[Incariol]

That explains everything!

Only in the present state. You have no evidence that the current state conditions applied 43 minutes ago.

 

[Doveaman]

Does 2+2=5 for you?

Nope.

But 1+1+1=1 for me.

 

[Doveaman]

Assuming the data is correct, then I agree with the results.

 

[dad]

What flood? There is no evidence of a worldwide flood. And I'm pretty sure the laws of physics didn't change about 4000 years ago along with this mythical flood.

Nonsense. This isn't the place to state your beliefs. If you have evidence against the historical record of the flood confirmed by Jesus Personally, show us. All I have ever seen is present state conjectures masquerading as science, that are easy to obliterate,

 

[dad]

Only in the present state. You have no evidence that the current state conditions applied 43 minutes ago.

Of course we do. You take your Last Thursdayist underpinnings too far. Reasonable proof exists in spades and in a plethora of forms.

 

[Incariol]

Of course we do. You take your Last Thursdayist underpinnings too far. Reasonable proof exists in spades and in a plethora of forms.

 

[Loudmouth]

However you can't just declare all space to be identical to earth space!

I don't need to. The field of astronomy has demonstrated that it is the same.

No one needs your unfounded insults about the people in the actual record that my people died to declare true. Have some respect.

You refuse to believe that the observations made in the field of astronomy indicate the constancy of physical laws, and yet you swallow whole a story written by humans about a person that rises from the dead. Cognitive dissonance much?

 

[Loudmouth]

Then consider this a wake up call. You have no clue whatsoever or knowledge regarding the laws and forces and state before the flood.

Yes, we do. There was no recent global flood. Planet formation started 4.55 billion years ago in this solar system, including the Earth. All of these are supported by the same evidence that supports your claims about how the Earth was 1 hour ago.

 

[dad]

I don't need to. The field of astronomy has demonstrated that it is the same.

False. It demonstrates that men project earth realities far away. Circular and godless nonsense. Unless space and forces and laws were the same all models are out the window, period. No, you may not assume and believe and call it science.

You refuse to believe that the observations made in the field of astronomy indicate the constancy of physical laws, and yet you swallow whole a story written by humans about a person that rises from the dead. Cognitive dissonance much?

The facts of the bible are proven and known by and large, and not any matter of debate. The so called observations from earth of things far far away are colored and filtered earth state belief based godless tripe.

 

[dad]

Yes, we do. There was no recent global flood. Planet formation started 4.55 billion years ago in this solar system, including the Earth. All of these are supported by the same evidence that supports your claims about how the Earth was 1 hour ago.

Peddle your godless religion elsewhere. Prove there was no flood? I'm up for a laugh. You have no idea, so act like it, be honest.

 

[Incariol]

Peddle your godless religion elsewhere. Prove there was no flood? I'm up for a laugh. You have no idea, so act like it, be honest.

Do you have any proof there was a flood. Burden of proof rests on the one making the positive claim, which would be you.

 

[dad]

Do you have any proof there was a flood. Burden of proof rests on the one making the positive claim, which would be you.

What belly button lint. The proof man has is the records. I have ..you have not. You have..?? What, silly same state past godless and utterly baseless speculation and 'models' of some never never land primordial past that has no chance whatsoever of being supported? Get serious.

 

[Incariol]

What belly button lint. The proof man has is the records.

That isn't scientific proof. We have the Iliad, does that mean you believe in the sovereignty of Zeus the thunderer?

I have ..you have not. You have..??

You have an English fail? I can see you are trying to communicate, but I can't tell what.

What, silly same state past godless and utterly baseless speculation and 'models' of some never never land primordial past that has no chance whatsoever of being supported? Get serious.

 

[dad]

That isn't scientific proof. We have the Iliad, does that mean you believe in the sovereignty of Zeus the thunderer?

Speak for yourself. I do not have the Iliad or Zeus. If you want scientific 'proof' you better be prepared to have some first. Have you proof of some set of forces and laws in place in the past? Have you some proof that there was no flood? Pony up, and stop blathering. I am not the one pretending science knows here.

You have an English fail? I can see you are trying to communicate, but I can't tell what.

Comprehension deficit, much?

 

[Incariol]

Speak for yourself. I do not have the Iliad or Zeus.

...are you joking? Your joking, right?

If you want scientific 'proof' you better be prepared to have some first.

We're waiting for you to give us the scientific proof of the flood. Yet you keep dithering.

Have you proof of some set of forces and laws in place in the past?

Do you?

Have you some proof that there was no flood? Pony up, and stop blathering. I am not the one pretending science knows here.

No, and you aren't pretending to know logic, either.

Argument from ignorance - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comprehension deficit, much?

It's terribly cute how creationists resort to personal attacks when people question them.