Again, you don't dispute that Jerome found pre-marital sex to be sinful.
Everything we know about ancient Jews and early Christians, the Christians of the first couple centuries, indicates that virginity at marriage was considered good and that lack of virginity at marriage was undesirable, that fooling around before marriage was considered sinful.
We aren't to be slaves to our flesh or to promote lust in our hearts.
You keep saying everything we know, but back it up with something other than the statement.
Who could deny Jerome saw premarital sex as evil, he saw all sex as evil, in and out of marriage. Study his writings, he basically viewed women as evil, even stated a womans privates were as filthy as pigs.
Virginity was desired at marriage for who...new unmarried brides, because they were property of the father to be given to the husband. Her virgin status proved she had not been with another man, bore his children, etc..
Most of these girls married before 14, but were allowed to marry at 12.5 years of age. If a girl wasn't a virgin, it was possible she gave birth. Children then were workers, that was there value. This was the reason for the dowry, the father would lose a worker, so the husband paid the father for this loss.
We can say virginity is more desirable, but that doesn't make pre marital sex sinful, non virgins could marry and have all the protections as a virgin as long as they admitted they were non virgins.
Non virgin women highly outnumbered virgins, but most of these were married and husbands killed in battle. These women often had premarital sex, some accepted, some forced, but the man had to follow biblical law, they could marry them or not, it was up to the man.
Upvote
0