Another look at the moon landing.

[prodromos]

Well it seemed to me like a royal telephone considering they were in deep space when the president called to congregate them Maybe the God gave the president his royal phone : )

My, my, how on earth do people with landlines speak to people with mobile phones. It's all a big conspiracy. There must be wires connecting the mobile phones to the phone network. There couldn't possibly be radio involved, that's akin to witchcraft.

Dave you certainly didn’t mention masonry but me certainly did. And for good reason.

No good reason, you are simply engaging in a logical fallacy.

Just putting a few feelers out for you to dig some deeper. And that being all is not as it seems. Have you ever watched the video called ( a strange thing happened on the way to the moon )

The guy who put that film together is a fraud. It has been debunked to hell and back.

 

[Apple Sky]

The guy who put that film together is a fraud. It has been debunked to hell and back.

Not unlike those who staged the Apollo missions to the moon & claimed they walked on it.

 

[Strong in Him]

Not unlike those who staged the Apollo missions to the moon & claimed they walked on it.

Totally the opposite.
You can't prove that they didn't walk on it.

 

[Apple Sky]

You don't recognise the truth of TFE; big difference.

There's a whole thread on this, I suggest you go read it.

 

[Apple Sky]

You can't prove that they didn't walk on it.

And you can't prove that they did.

 

[prodromos]

Not unlike those who staged the Apollo missions to the moon & claimed they walked on it.

Your above statement is completely false, so yes, not unlike that utterly debunked nonsense of a film.

 

[Strong in Him]

And you can't prove that they did.

But Charles Duke - and others can.
I choose to believe a born again Christian who talks about his walk on the moon and his walk with Jesus.

Shame you don't.
Shame that you call a Christian a liar.

 

[prodromos]

There's a whole thread on this, I suggest you go read it.

Why? The thread doesn't support your claims.

 

[prodromos]

And you can't prove that they did.

We can. Your refusal to accept the evidence is not our problem.

 

[Strong in Him]

There's a whole thread on this, I suggest you go read it.

If it's the thread about going to Antarctica, I read and commented on it.
If it's the thread about Dean Odel rubbishing the photographic evidence from Antarctica, even though he didn't go. I think I commented on that too.

 

[prodromos]

If it's the thread about going to Antarctica, I read and commented on it.
If it's the thread about Dean Odel rubbishing the photographic evidence from Antarctica, even though he didn't go. I think I commented on that too.

It's @Apple Sky showing her failing memory again.

 

[Apple Sky]

But Charles Duke - and others can.

That's all you've got is a few testimonies.

 

[Strong in Him]

That's all you've got is a few testimonies.

But others have got photos, moon rocks, maybe journals etc.

Would you have told the Apostles that all they had were "a few testimonies"?
Charles Duke, and others, became Christians after the moon landings. They did not say "we made it up", or "yeah, we have to confess, we fooled you."
Charles has said that the walk on the moon lasted for 3 days, but his walk with Jesus will last for the rest of his life.
And that going to the moon was not the greatest event of his life; meeting Jesus was.
If he is lying about the moon, then he is lying about Jesus too.

 

[Apple Sky]

And that going to the moon was not the greatest event of his life; meeting Jesus was.

As it is with all Christians but sooner or later one must repent.

 

[Hentenza]

And you can't prove that they did.

I already did.

 

[Hentenza]

That's all you've got is a few testimonies.

And light deflectors on lunar soil. I guess they got there via UPS. Oh wait……

 

[pgp_protector]

-
​

I would quit posting this video, as it is part of an attempt to discredit any flat earth beliefs. It is like these false flat earth people, like that person who went on that trip, or that Robbie Davidson person who has now disappeared.

Robbie Davidson

These rockets only go about 8 miles high, about the height of Clouds

Atlas rocket launch seen from Jet airliner.
Well above the clouds.

 

[Strong in Him]

As it is with all Christians but sooner or later one must repent.

A person can't accept Jesus and believe that he died for their sins without repenting.
Charles Duke went to, and walked on, the moon. Years later, he became a Christian. He now gives talks about his time on the moon AND talks about Jesus, who saved him. Jesus gave Charles his testimony.
If you're saying that Charles is a liar, you are saying that you don't believe Jesus.

I am sure that there are non Christians who go to hear Charles and come away, at least challenged by, or believing in, Jesus.
If they were converted, by Jesus, through Charles' testimony but that original testimony had been false, then their conversions would not be valid.

Are you so stubborn that you would say that Charles, other Christian astronauts and anyone who heard about Jesus through them, are lying/making it up, rather than; "yes, he did walk on the moon, what he says is true and he now has a fantastic ministry for God"?

Saying that men did not walk on the moon is not a sin.
Saying that men who walked on the moon, since became Christians and now tell others about Jesus, are lying, is dishonouring God. Which is a sin.

 

[Apple Sky]

A person can't accept Jesus and believe that he died for their sins without repenting.

I know this but this astronaut needs to repent in public.

 

[prodromos]

I know this but this astronaut needs to repent in public.

He may have things to repent of, we all do, but he has nothing that requires a public repentance. You, on the other hand, do, as you have publicly slandered a Christian brother.