Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Already explained to you .What he clearly states is 'that we will be able to go to the moon' ???
Does he also clearly state that "we will be able to go to the moon for the first time,"
So he is not saying that the earlier moon landings never took place, is he?No he doesn't have to he clearly states 'that this will allow to go to the moon. '
Already explained to you .
Multiple times.
You just laugh reacted.
I reckon she can add ‘simple context in plain English’ to the list of things she doesn’t understand. That list already includes basic maths, very basic physics, very basic astronomy, common sense, simple visual observation and, most importantly, Bible study….Already explained to you .
Multiple times.
You just laugh reacted.
Side note.
Is English your first (primary) language?
I remember this from my younger days & I still have a copy of his fictional novel “The Fountains of Paradise” based around this concept and published in 1979, although in the acknowledgements he does credit the original idea to others in a letter to “Science” magazine in 1966. Maybe someday I’ll get around to rereading the novel…maybe.Also space elevators are not a new concept in space exploration - Arthur C Clarke proposed the concept many decades ago, and it would work for connecting the Earth to any body in geostationary orbit.
It features in Isaac Azimov's "Foundation" series as well.I remember this from my younger days & I still have a copy of his fictional novel “The Fountains of Paradise” based around this concept and published in 1979, although in the acknowledgements he does credit the original idea to others in a letter to “Science” magazine in 1966. Maybe someday I’ll get around to rereading the novel…maybe.
Unfortunately it followed the current trend of 'strong' female leads and a caricature of 'patriarchy'. Such a shame.I haven’t read that series. I notice Apple have a TV series based on it, though I believe it doesn’t stay true to the books.
Unfortunately it followed the current trend of 'strong' female leads and a caricature of 'patriarchy'. Such a shame.
Oops…
View attachment 362050
Conspiracy theorists will believe this is a real photo from a studio here on earth…I won’t be surprised if it makes it to 153news at some stage claiming proof of NASA skulduggery…
He forgot to say Tesla cars don’t exist.Not quite.
SPACE PSYOPS GONE WILD! FROM FAKE MOON SUNRISES TO PLANTING A FLAG ON MARS THE DECEPTIONS ARE REAL!
He forgot to say Tesla cars don’t exist.
And the reason for the meme I posted is to show the level of logical argument flat earthers and conspiracy theorists demonstrate while attempting to debunk moon landings etc
And this is what I'm highlighting. The arguments made by conspiracy theorists have been debunked numerous times. Anybody with an ability to research their claims will find such 'proof' to be severely lacking. Conspiracy theorists really only demonstrate that they either haven't grasped basic facts or they are grifting.We don't just debunk the moon landings we try to prove that it never happened
Looking back on this thread for example, you tried to question why the moon buggy tyres didn't implode.
And this is an unhelpful trait of yours. Instead of taking the facts on board and acknowledging you were wrong, you try to ridicule something else.
And this is an unhelpful trait of yours. Instead of taking the facts on board and acknowledging you were wrong, you try to ridicule something else.
As I’ve said before, try to show some effort at reasoning things out instead of diverting away from the point.
If you wonder why people lose patience with you, this is but one example.
First, if you want a question taken seriously, don’t put a bouncing laughing face after it. That just indicates ridicule, not seriousness.This is a genuine question 'what about the Tesla car tyres' ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?