Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Because if I did, I imagine you would reply with something like, "You can't trust anything NAA says."
OK, I'll try. Here is what a NASA site says about the symbol:Say anyway, you never know.
The round shape of the insignia represents a planet.
It's the shape of the whole logo, not part of the logo. The quote from the site began: ""The round red, white and blue insignia,"What or where is this on their logo ?
It's the shape of the whole logo, not part of the logo. The quote from the site began: ""The round red, white and blue insignia,"
Don't worry about it. God bless you.Oh, silly me - Thank you.
"The round red, white and blue insignia, nicknamed the “meatball,” was designed by employee James Modarelli in 1959, NASA’s second year. The design incorporates references to different aspects of the mission of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The round shape of the insignia represents a planet. The stars represent space. The red v-shaped wing represents aeronautics. The circular orbit around the agency’s name represents space travel."
Not really sure what you mean - sorry! Do you mean that the chevrons need to be exaggerated to make them into a snake's tongue? I am fairly sure you didn't mean that a snake exaggerated the chevrons.Thanks for this David, I suppose the red chevron's are well over exaggerated by a snake
Not really sure what you mean - sorry! Do you mean that the chevrons need to be exaggerated to make them into a snake's tongue? I am fairly sure you didn't mean that a snake exaggerated the chevrons.
A snake exaggerated the chevrons? If you mean the devil, who is also called the serpent and Satan, why would he want to exaggerate something like that? I thought your whole idea about NASA was that it is deceptive. Drawing attention to the devil would take away the deception you say exists. I am sure most people wouldn't even think about a snake's tongue when looking at the NASA logo. I have only ever come across such an notion from your posts on this thread.IMO - The chevrons have been highly exaggerated by a snake via certain individuals.
Yes, I would agree with you there.IMO - The chevrons have been highly exaggerated by a snake via certain individuals.
I think she might mean that the red chevrons on NASA's logo have been likened to the forked tongue of a snake. And some have produced pictures which show that.A snake exaggerated the chevrons? If you mean the devil, who is also called the serpent and Satan, why would he want to exaggerate something like that? I thought your whole idea about NASA was that it is deceptive. Drawing attention to the devil would take away the deception you say exists. I am sure most people wouldn't even think about a snake's tongue when looking at the NASA logo. I have only ever come across such an notion from your posts on this thread.
Thanks. That would certainly make more sense than the idea that a snake did the design.I think she might mean that the red chevrons on NASA's logo have been likened to the forked tongue of a snake. And some have produced pictures which show that.
I am sure most people wouldn't even think about a snake's tongue when looking at the NASA logo. I have only ever come across such an notion from your posts on this thread.
Yes, I didn't think you just looked at NASA's symbol one day and thought to yourself, "Ah, that red bit is a serpent's tongue, so that shows how devilish NASA is!"I first came across it years ago on some conspiracy forum & the image has never left me, once seen never forgotton.
It's a conspiracy theory - "NASA's logo has a snake's tongue on it; a snake can be poisonous or dangerous and in the Bible it is an analogy for the devil. Therefore, NASA is dangerous, evil and can't be trusted."
Sorry, but I doubt very much that you know the top dogs.I still wouldn't trust NASA or believe any of them especially the top dogs.
Sorry, but I doubt very much that you know the top dogs.
Right - and do any of those short bios say; "and he is a well-known liar who has successfully conned people into believing the moon landings"?Not know them but can read about them.
AI Overview
View attachment 371763
Sean Duffy is the acting administrator of NASA, holding the position while also serving as the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Transportation. Amit Kshatriya serves as the associate administrator, which is the highest-ranking civil servant, and Casey Swails is the deputy associate administrator, assisting with day-to-day operations and strategic direction.
- Acting Administrator: Sean Duffy
- He was appointed by President Trump and also holds his position as the Secretary of Transportation.
- Associate Administrator:Amit Kshatriya
- He is the highest-ranking civil servant at NASA and advises the administrator.
- Deputy Associate Administrator:Casey Swails
- He is the principal advisor to the associate administrator and helps with daily operations and strategic planning
Right - and do any of those short bios say; "and he is a well-known liar who has successfully conned people into believing the moon landings"?
So you might have some information about what they do, but you don't know them.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?