Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Nope, it doesn't... but God's word and understanding does.
You'd have to ask them - although suspending established physical law for a claim about scripture is right up your streetKinda like educatees suspending relativity to claim the Joshua passage as a reference to geocentrism, isn't it?
If you say so, but they themselves aren’t so sure of it. So I think maybe, just maybe you are inflating that certainty just a little.That's just the thing. Through study, geologists, hydrologists, planetary scientists... all have a very good understanding of the earth's past and how we explain the evidence we see today.
Your ignorance does not trump their understanding.
It’s your own geologists that claim they can date the earth and fossils by the order in which the strata was laid down, and confirm its consistency by existing worldwide. Are you implying they are incorrect?Are you implying that there is a single sedimentary stratum that blankets the entire earth?
Reference please.
There is, and since each one is uniform the world over, which in your comment above wanted to argue against..... and is sedimentary.......It is funny - creationists generally attack the fact that there is not 100% uniform geologic column the world over, but here the resident expert on 'allies' and 'genetic strains' - and now, apparently geology - implying that there is one.
So should evolutionists, or is it Darwinism, Neo-Darwinism, Lankarianism, catastrophes, or millions of years or sudden change?i think creationists should all meet and figure out which sides of arguments they should take.
You know, to avoid contradicting each other.
Geologist agree with me, uniform sedimentary layers worldwide, remember. All in uniform consistent layers, remember...You want me to believe that you are the world's leading geology expert, and have even more clout that creationist geologists on this matter, such that you kow thatthere is a uniform stratum the world over?
The chapter of the creation, penned by God. Look up global extinctions....Five world-wide floods?
Chapter and verse please.
Of course, just like the ignore what hayah means in Hebrew, the word they translate as “was”even when their own concordance doesn’t list that as any of its meanings.Amazing - never heard that before - in fact, creationists argue AGAINST that!
References please.
You see it, from the age of the dinosaurs onward. It just hasn’t formed into sedimentary rock yet, but is consistent as that’s how geologists say they can date things worldwide, remember?Still waiting for a single uniform world-wide stratum that will contain the fossils of all the humans killed in the flood along with every other form of creature.
Funny how some believe the works declare his glory, then refuse to consider the works at all. Look up mass extinctions, every one of which the fossils are contained in sedimentary strata, worldwide.So is it just me, or are some of the local bible scholar/science experts basically inventing non-biblical events to support their biblical version of history?
5 world-wide floods?
So, God had 1 - what were the other 4 for?
One for each of the main deities?
It's called 'Relativity' because of the Principle of Relativity - which "requires physical laws to be the same for any body moving at constant velocity as they are for a body at rest (relative to some observer). A consequence is that an observer in an inertial reference frame cannot determine an absolute speed or direction of travel in space, and may only speak of speed or direction relative to some other object."Says the one that is in motion, with the same mindset as was the twin in motion, yet the twin was wrong about everything he believed, even if he thought he was correct.
I understand, it’s ok for you to ignore Relativity even if you claim to believe in it. Saying someone is not understanding without pointing out anything is childish.
A child says you are wrong, nana nana nana. An adult actually shows how. Show me how. Was the twin in motion right about anything at all? Name one observation he made that was correct?
-_- oh my gosh, I was pointing out that they couldn't have faked the photo in the first place, and you straight up ignore me by saying that they faked it and you don't even address the fact that the equipment needed to fake it didn't exist in 1969. And remember, the moon landing was televised at the time, and recorded by multiple people with no affiliation with it, so no retroactive editing down the line.a NASA source?
Lets get some peer reviewing.
NASA is maintaining the lie with your TAX
China did that with an unmanned rover, what would they need a person for to do that?No other country has gone to place a bigger flag next the USA.
It would cost 1.5 billion US dollars for a two person mission with modern technology. From what I can find, NASA's budget in 2016 was 18.5 billion dollars. But why waste money sending more people to the moon when you could send things to places less explored? Why put in extra money for it to be manned instead of unmanned, which is less expensive and dangerous? To get people like you to stop saying the original moon landings were faked? As if you wouldn't just say the recent ones were faked too.The technology NASA went to the moon in is like a tin can now.
Shouldn't cost much.
-_- oh my gosh, I was pointing out that they couldn't have faked the photo in the first place, and you straight up ignore me by saying that they faked it and you don't even address the fact that the equipment needed to fake it didn't exist in 1969. And remember, the moon landing was televised at the time, and recorded by multiple people with no affiliation with it, so no retroactive editing down the line.
China did that with an unmanned rover, what would they need a person for to do that?
It would cost 1.5 billion US dollars for a two person mission with modern technology. From what I can find, NASA's budget in 2016 was 18.5 billion dollars. But why waste money sending more people to the moon when you could send things to places less explored? Why put in extra money for it to be manned instead of unmanned, which is less expensive and dangerous? To get people like you to stop saying the original moon landings were faked? As if you wouldn't just say the recent ones were faked too.
They are evidence that there was no global flood. If God sought to conceal the evidence of his work, why did he leave all this contrary evidence?Are you submitting these scars as evidence of a global flood?
I thought you guys were saying there wasn't any evidence?
Make up my mind, will you?
"Conceal," "interfere," "erase evidence" ... it's no wonder you guys don't understand.They are evidence that there was no global flood. If God sought to conceal the evidence of his work, why did he leave all this contrary evidence?
Grave robbers (scientists) can't find 2 million Jews who lived and died in the wilderness ... even given their itinerary (book of Numbers).Still waiting for a single uniform world-wide stratum that will contain the fossils of all the humans killed in the flood along with every other form of creature.
My list is of the mess he left unaddressed."Conceal," "interfere," "erase evidence" ... it's no wonder you guys don't understand.
Had God not [concealed, interfered, erased evidence] we wouldn't be here.
Or maybe He just ... you know ... cleaned up the mess?
Your list, as far as I'm concerned, is nonsense.My list is of the mess he left unaddressed.
It's called 'Relativity' because of the Principle of Relativity - which "requires physical laws to be the same for any body moving at constant velocity as they are for a body at rest (relative to some observer). A consequence is that an observer in an inertial reference frame cannot determine an absolute speed or direction of travel in space, and may only speak of speed or direction relative to some other object."
The reason that there is an age difference at their reunion is because one twin has changed his inertial frame at the point he turned around to come back; this makes a significant difference, as explained in this Minute Physics video:
If you say so, but they themselves aren’t so sure of it. So I think maybe, just maybe you are inflating that certainty just a little.
Why all we knew about planets is wrong
Duly noted. You do not consider the presence of unconformities, disconformities, fault zones, sediments arranged in discernible environments of deposition, and astroblemes to be of any signficance.Your list, as far as I'm concerned, is nonsense.
Funny how some believe the works declare his glory, then refuse to consider the works at all. Look up mass extinctions, every one of which the fossils are contained in sedimentary strata, worldwide.
But don’t confuse the works as being penned by the same author as penned the Bible, we wouldn’t want to confuse the two I guess.
See post above.I suppose that the K-T extinction is the best known example. Are you proposing that it was caused by a worldwide flood?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?