Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Unconditional!!!! Saved regatdless, that was not said but the tenants of the presentation promotes the idea. All you have to do is believe and you have heaven. Once saved always saved.Why do you promote the covenant of law over its replacement covenant of unconditional promises?
Did you not suggest that it was the law of Jesus and not the Father that we are called to?Why do you think I would be interested in that part?
Please permit me to answer your question with a question. Did salvation come through the Israelites or the Gentles? We need to stop this folly of separation when it comes to the truth of God!No one claims anything was abolished, no matter how often you try to impose that.
In exodus, for whom was that a test, Israelites or gentiles?
Bother you are fighting the truth. This same covenant, testimony, testament all that you want to term it was seen in Heaven by John. It therefore has not been abandoned by God. That is the point. You want to ignore that , it is your privilege, but please don't make it seen like it is not there and that it only existed in the "old covenant". This kind of reaction to God's plainly stated word hurts me to the core. If we are bearer of the truth why treat it so? That is the difference between we being a Saul or a Paul.Testimony, covenant, testament... These are synonyms.
This was the ark of the covenant... the old covenant
Both! Gal 3:29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.Which one of the two parties mentioned in this passage are you? The house of Israel or the house of Judah?
The ruler(S) changed in your presentation, but in God kingdom there is no change of ruler. Old or new testament same God same ruler, no comparison.Americans were once under British law, now American law.
So what if some of the laws are the same. If Americans aren't allowed to murder, and that was part of British law too, is it a sound argument to say that because Americans aren't allowed to murder, they are under British law still?
Instead of accepting 'what' transpired according to the epistle to the Hebrews, you choose rather to question 'why'. In short, you don't accept Scripture explaining that God took away the first covenant, which was the Ten Commandments and the Book of the Law.Why? Because the law that say we should have no other God is obsolete? Because the law that says we should not kill is obsolete. Or because for one as shown in Heb 7, that Christ is the new High priest which was not of the tribe of Levi? Which is of the law of the priesthood and not the ten commandments.
It goes without saying that if you claim to be Abraham's seed, then you are neither of the House of Israel nor Judah.Both! Gal 3:29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.
And I am happy to be.
False.Bother you are fighting the truth. This same covenant, testimony, testament all that you want to term it was seen in Heaven by John.
In the context what is the difference in saying "fulfill". You are making the point that it does not apply to us. Abolished put us in the same place. Do not apply, not necessary, uncalled for. Is that not also the result of your "fulfilled"?Keep on deliberately misrepresenting by insisting on using "abolish" and you show us exactly how well you comprehend what we are saying.
Go back to Exodus 16, and answer the question instead of avoiding the obvious.Please permit me to answer your question with a question. Did salvation come through the Israelites or the Gentles? We need to stop this folly of separation when it comes to the truth of God!
Yes, unconditional was accurate - reliance on the promises and performance of a Holy God Who made those promises.Unconditional!!!! Saved regatdless, that was not said but the tenants of the presentation promotes the idea. All you have to do is believe and you have heaven. Once saved always saved.
All of these ideas are at the center of the rejection of God Holy Ten commandment law. With the removal of thou should do or thou should not do as in the Ten commandments leaves us with nothing to do and still be saved. Does that mark biblical accuracy? Is that what the bible teaches. It just goes to show that when the idea that the law is abolished is closely examine it can not stand.
Links and definitions of the Greek pleroo that is rendered as 'fulfill' in most English translations has been provided to you for years, and you still don't accept the promise Jesus made of consummating the Mosaic covenant in His Blood.In the context what is the difference in saying "fulfill". You are making the point that it does not apply to us. Abolished put us in the same place. Do not apply, not necessary, uncalled for. Is that not also the result of your "fulfilled"?
So excuse me please. Is not obeying God doing His will? To worship God only as in the first commandments is not doing His will??? Come on speak up!!
Please permit me to answer your question with a question. Did salvation come through the Israelites or the Gentles? We need to stop this folly of separation when it comes to the truth of God!
Bother you are fighting the truth. This same covenant, testimony, testament all that you want to term it was seen in Heaven by John. It therefore has not been abandoned by God. That is the point. You want to ignore that , it is your privilege, but please don't make it seen like it is not there and that it only existed in the "old covenant". This kind of reaction to God's plainly stated word hurts me to the core. If we are bearer of the truth why treat it so? That is the difference between we being a Saul or a Paul.
Both! Gal 3:29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.
And I am happy to be.
The ruler(S) changed in your presentation, but in God kingdom there is no change of ruler. Old or new testament same God same ruler, no comparison.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?