cantata
Queer non-theist, with added jam.
- Feb 20, 2007
- 6,215
- 683
- 37
- Faith
- Humanist
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
- Politics
- UK-Liberal-Democrats
Not to punish the parents. Did you read my post? I said if the child is SICK, COLD, HUNGRY, etc. Would you rather keep the child in a household where it's starving and just give the parents money? How do you even know they'd spend it on the kids? It may be going to drugs and maybe that's why they don't have a JOB in the first place.
Yeah, maybe. Or maybe not.
You can't generalise about every situation, and I find it bizarre that you're framing this in terms of laziness, and also that you're advocating calling social services solely on the basis of the parents' failure to find employment. Of course if a child is being abused it needs to be looked after, but you don't make that call based on whether or not the parents happen to be working.
Upvote
0