HeatherJay said:
I have a question. If the reason that you don't believe in God is lack of proof,
Well, I don't believe in god because I see no reason to believe in god. This is important to understand. If I walked up to you and told you that I controlled space elves that make it rain,
do you not believe me because I don't have 100% proof? This is the exact same thing for me.
HeatherJay said:
my question is can you ever have 100% proof that there is no God?
Actually that unfortunately is not the question, in accepting the terms of that question I would have to accept the existence of what you are asking me to disprove in order to accept the question. Take this as an example : "Can you ever have 100% proof that I don't control space elves?"
Seriously think about that for a second, not about the literal nature of something silly like space elves but the nature of the question itself, since you know there are no space elves, where do you begin? You can't, so you see how the burden of proof lies on the person making the assertation. You would naturally say to me, "Prove, to me there are space elves first!" Just swap space elves for god in any of these and the same circumstances exist.
HeatherJay said:
I hope this doesn't come off as sounding judgemental...it's not meant to be in any way. It's just, I can understand the agnostic view point (basically, they don't know so they don't commit either way...if I'm wrong, please tell me)...
I think you have a misconception of what an agnostic is. I will explain it in the next block.
HeatherJay said:
but the atheist point of view is that there is definitely no God, right? I guess I don't understand not even leaving the tiniest bit of room for the possibility of God. Can anyone explain it to me? Thanks.
Love, Heather
Okay, here is how it works.
Atheist - simply stated, you do not actively believe in God. On a number line where 6 is absolute belief and -6 is absolute denial an atheist is at 0.
We
do not actively believe in god .
Now in that you have explicit and implicit atheists, the qualifier for this would be if you have been presented enough information to make an informed decision. So, I who went to catholic school and have studied many world religions and still am an atheist is an explicit atheist. While a child in China, who has never heard of a god is an implicit atheist. He has not been presented with the theistic information to make a decision on his own.
Now, we come to agnostics, where that is whether or not you believe it is
possible to 100% know whether god exists. So you can have an atheistic agnostic like myself, who
does not actively believe in god - atheist : and who does not think it is possible to know - agnostic
Then there are theistic agnostics even priests and ministers who
actively believe in god - theist : who also don't think it is possible to 100% know - agnostic .
So, did that help? Or did I bog you down with jargon
