• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • Christian Forums is looking to bring on new moderators to the CF Staff Team! If you have been an active member of CF for at least three months with 200 posts during that time, you're eligible to apply! This is a great way to give back to CF and keep the forums running smoothly! If you're interested, you can submit your application here!

Alabama Senator Katie Britt introduces Laken Riley Act to 119th Congress - Bill Passed House

Hazelelponi

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 25, 2018
11,674
11,124
USA
✟1,006,690.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
The Laken Riley Act was passed today in Congress, the first bill to pass in the New Year with bipartisan support 264-159


Introduced in House (01/03/2025)

Laken Riley Act Bill Summary:

This bill requires the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to detain certain non-U.S. nationals (aliens under federal law) who have been arrested for burglary, theft, larceny, or shoplifting. The bill also authorizes states to sue the federal government for decisions or alleged failures related to immigration enforcement.

Under this bill, must detain an individual who (1) is unlawfully present in the United States or did not possess the necessary documents when applying for admission; and (2) has been charged with, arrested for, convicted of, or admits to having committed acts that constitute the essential elements of burglary, theft, larceny, or shoplifting.

The bill also authorizes state governments to sue for injunctive relief over certain immigration-related decisions or alleged failures by the federal government if the decision or failure caused the state or its residents harm, including financial harm of more than $100. Specifically, the state government may sue the federal government over a

decision to release a non-U.S. national from custody;

failure to fulfill requirements relating to inspecting individuals seeking admission into the United States, including requirements related to asylum interviews;

failure to fulfill a requirement to stop issuing visas to nationals of a country that unreasonably denies or delays acceptance of nationals of that country;

violation of limitations on immigration parole, such as the requirement that parole be granted only on a case-by-case basis; or

failure to detain an individual who has been ordered removed from the United States.



An article on the event:

WASHINGTON, D.C. (WHNT) — Alabama Senator Katie Britt introduced her first bill of the 119th Congress Tuesday: The Laken Riley Act.

The Laken Riley Act would require U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to “arrest illegal aliens who commit theft, burglary, larceny, or shoplifting offenses and would mandate that these aliens are detained until they are removed from the United States so they cannot re-offend and commit further crimes,” Britt said.

This legislation would also ensure states have standing to bring civil actions against federal officials who refuse to enforce immigration law or who violate the law.

Laken Riley’s mother and stepfather joined in with full support of this act introduced by Britt.





A Congressional Representative from California, among others, voted in favor of the bill also:



I'm very glad this bill passed.
 
Last edited:

FreeinChrist

CF Advisory team
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2003
151,012
19,445
USA
✟1,997,287.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Good though it is not law until Biden or Trump signs it.

My only concern is that those who commit violent crimes are not just kicked out of the country, but that they are jailed wherever they are. IF an illegal immigrant fatally harms someone due to drunken driving, it is not good to just to deport him as he will just sneak back in.

For instance, my SIL and family traveled to Orlando to have a family vacation at Disney World. Enroute from the airport, a drunk driver, who was from the middle east, rear ended one of the cars so bad that three went to the hospital and the 8 month old first grandchild was killed. The drunk driver did post bail and then left the country. He slipped back but luckily was caught pretty quick (drunk again), and is now spending the rest of his life in jail.

It does no good to just boot them out unless there is justice with it.
 
Upvote 0

Eternally Grateful

Well-Known Member
Aug 15, 2018
1,008
309
59
Columbus, Ohio
✟38,798.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
It should be as I always thought it was. If they commit a crime, they pay for that crime, after they pay, they are departed. And depending on the crime. They may or may not be able to apply for legal entry into the us
 
Upvote 0

Hazelelponi

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 25, 2018
11,674
11,124
USA
✟1,006,690.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Good though it is not law until Biden or Trump signs it.

My only concern is that those who commit violent crimes are not just kicked out of the country, but that they are jailed wherever they are. IF an illegal immigrant fatally harms someone due to drunken driving, it is not good to just to deport him as he will just sneak back in.

For instance, my SIL and family traveled to Orlando to have a family vacation at Disney World. Enroute from the airport, a drunk driver, who was from the middle east, rear ended one of the cars so bad that three went to the hospital and the 8 month old first grandchild was killed. The drunk driver did post bail and then left the country. He slipped back but luckily was caught pretty quick (drunk again), and is now spending the rest of his life in jail.

It does no good to just boot them out unless there is justice with it.


The bill still has to get through the Senate, and Trump wants to do one larger bill instead of many smaller bills so something like this could be easily added to a large bill, though on the other hand when single bills have too much added it's a a problem too, and passing this separately ensures some protection.

Therefore, I don't know how the Senate passage will go in the end, whether it will be yes or no.

However, I'm not sure what you mean by justice being attached?

If someone is here and breaks our laws how is detaining them for deportation unjust?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

FreeinChrist

CF Advisory team
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2003
151,012
19,445
USA
✟1,997,287.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
The bill still has to get through the Senate, and Trump wants to do one larger bill instead of many smaller bills so something like this could be easily added to a large bill, though on the other hand when single bills have too much added it's a a problem too, and passing this separately ensures some protection.

Therefore, I don't know how the Senate passage will go in the end, whether it will be yes or no.

However, I'm not sure what you mean by justice being attached?

If someone is here and breaks our laws how is detaining them for deportation unjust?
Detaining them for deportation is not unjust if they are illegal. However, if that illegal had committed murder while here, why is it okay just to deport them to be free in a different country?

They need to serve the sentence here before deportation.
 
Upvote 0

Hazelelponi

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 25, 2018
11,674
11,124
USA
✟1,006,690.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Detaining them for deportation is not unjust if they are illegal. However, if that illegal had committed murder while here, why is it okay just to deport them to be free in a different country?

They need to serve the sentence here before deportation.

It's upon release from jail that they are detained as a matter of course. They "pay" for the crime and then leave the US.

Most low level crimes I'd personally rather just deport them. Why spend the money to jail them when we are kicking them out anyway?

But murderers and the like have to spend time in prison somewhere though it would be nicer to treat thing's like that as international incidents and let the prison time be served in their home countries. Again, just a cost savings for us, plus they aren't our responsibility, their parent country is responsible for their actions and it's their own country they are subject of.

Plus, the guy who will be spending time in an Egyptian or Venezuelan prison is going to be far less likely to commit a crime.

We need to hold their parent countries responsible for their citizens actions when here.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

Hazelelponi

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 25, 2018
11,674
11,124
USA
✟1,006,690.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
We can't control other countries like that. IF they committ a crime here, the only way to be sure they pay is jailing them here.

I actually don't believe that would be true across the board. We could expect any one of a number of nations to be cooperative and respectful of our laws if they have a citizen who committed a felony here.

Sure, some countries won't, but the ones we can trust not to want felons on their own streets we could likely just deport to their parent country with the agreement they serve time in their home country, saving us money.

But that's a musing of my own that has nothing to do with this bill.

 
  • Winner
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

Laodicean60

Well-Known Member
Jul 2, 2023
4,902
2,353
64
NM
✟93,296.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Good though it is not law until Biden or Trump signs it.

My only concern is that those who commit violent crimes are not just kicked out of the country, but that they are jailed wherever they are. IF an illegal immigrant fatally harms someone due to drunken driving, it is not good to just to deport him as he will just sneak back in.

For instance, my SIL and family traveled to Orlando to have a family vacation at Disney World. Enroute from the airport, a drunk driver, who was from the middle east, rear ended one of the cars so bad that three went to the hospital and the 8 month old first grandchild was killed. The drunk driver did post bail and then left the country. He slipped back but luckily was caught pretty quick (drunk again), and is now spending the rest of his life in jail.

It does no good to just boot them out unless there is justice with it.
The slipping back in is one reason I support the wall.
 
Upvote 0