I'm working on an article for Spectrum magazine that would deal with the claim the EGW copied from "works of fiction."
So, far, I've laid it out so that the plural aspect ("works") is dealt with quickly (i.e., not true). I then point out that EGW didn't have Ingraham's book in any of her libraries. I then suggest various ways of understanding how the literary similarity that we think we see can be understood. I then show what experts in the field call plagiarism (in terms of provability). I then started showing a double-column analysis -- the problem I've run into is that one set of alleged examples takes the entire page and even that doesn't show all of it so I'm going to need another page just to pick up the "remnants." So, my question is: should I dispense with the actual display and just tell people what the results were? Or, should I just show the high points? Or, should I show it all and let the reader sort it out?
So, far, I've laid it out so that the plural aspect ("works") is dealt with quickly (i.e., not true). I then point out that EGW didn't have Ingraham's book in any of her libraries. I then suggest various ways of understanding how the literary similarity that we think we see can be understood. I then show what experts in the field call plagiarism (in terms of provability). I then started showing a double-column analysis -- the problem I've run into is that one set of alleged examples takes the entire page and even that doesn't show all of it so I'm going to need another page just to pick up the "remnants." So, my question is: should I dispense with the actual display and just tell people what the results were? Or, should I just show the high points? Or, should I show it all and let the reader sort it out?