• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Advice needed

djconklin

Moderate SDA
Sep 8, 2003
4,019
26
75
Visit site
✟26,806.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
I'm working on an article for Spectrum magazine that would deal with the claim the EGW copied from "works of fiction."

So, far, I've laid it out so that the plural aspect ("works") is dealt with quickly (i.e., not true). I then point out that EGW didn't have Ingraham's book in any of her libraries. I then suggest various ways of understanding how the literary similarity that we think we see can be understood. I then show what experts in the field call plagiarism (in terms of provability). I then started showing a double-column analysis -- the problem I've run into is that one set of alleged examples takes the entire page and even that doesn't show all of it so I'm going to need another page just to pick up the "remnants." So, my question is: should I dispense with the actual display and just tell people what the results were? Or, should I just show the high points? Or, should I show it all and let the reader sort it out?
 

truthmagnet

Regular Member
Feb 27, 2007
160
2
Visit site
✟15,291.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
I'm working on an article for Spectrum magazine that would deal with the claim the EGW copied from "works of fiction."

So, far, I've laid it out so that the plural aspect ("works") is dealt with quickly (i.e., not true). I then point out that EGW didn't have Ingraham's book in any of her libraries. I then suggest various ways of understanding how the literary similarity that we think we see can be understood. I then show what experts in the field call plagiarism (in terms of provability). I then started showing a double-column analysis -- the problem I've run into is that one set of alleged examples takes the entire page and even that doesn't show all of it so I'm going to need another page just to pick up the "remnants." So, my question is: should I dispense with the actual display and just tell people what the results were? Or, should I just show the high points? Or, should I show it all and let the reader sort it out?
hi, for a way to condense the columns, maybe you could find a way to "title" each example, like A-1= blah blah in left column and B-1=blay blay in right column. put both columns in a box. then below the box give the full details. A-1=blah blah blah, B-1=blay blay blay. A-2=blah blah blah b-2= blay blay blay. does that make sense?
 
Upvote 0

DrStupid_Ben

Regular Member
Apr 22, 2006
424
13
Cenral Coast, NSW
✟23,105.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
AU-Democrats
I reckon you should aim first with a comprehensive table, however, have an abridged version ready. Or submit both, and appeal to the discretion of the editorial staff. I think that Spectrum is the sort of forum that appreciates detail, and you're article will have strength of evidence.
 
Upvote 0