Nobody here has expressed an expectation that bacteria will turn into rabbits.
No matter how much you like to pretend the opposite.
to "pretend" that blind faith evolutionists do not start with some simple single-celled less-than-bacteria life form and then story-tell-it up to horse or rabbit - is to "pretend" that all the books on evolution "don't exist".
And we all know it.
So while you may find this very pointed summary of the laughable religion of blind-faith-evolutionism "inconvenient" - yet you provide no evidence against it as a summary except "your preference".
Blind faith evolutionism says "
a pile of dirt will sure-enough turn into a rabbit over time - given a sufficiently talented and large pile of dirt (Earth) and a sufficiently talented and long period of time filled with improbable just-so stories that are easy enough to tell - but they are not science".
Dawkins provides the "improbable" adjective.
Patterson provides the "stories that are easy enough to tell - but they are not science" descriptive.
Every goofy evolution text on the planet provides the "start with simple life form - get to horse over time" model.
All of them - pro-evolution sources.
And... we all know it.
======================
So then if you and the evolution text book writers do not prefer to summarize your beliefs in the short pointed form "
a pile of dirt will sure-enough turn into a rabbit over time - given a sufficiently talented and large pile of dirt (Earth) and a sufficiently talented and long period of time filled with improbable just-so stories that are easy enough to tell - but they are not science" since it exposes the perfidity in the argument for faith in evolutionism - that is understandable.
But if you can challenge an actual fact given in that summary - it would be more 'objective' than just "we don't like to say it that way because it exposes the flaw in our story".
Life did start with simple, single celled life, yes.
Indeed and the atheist would argue that it is not an "eternal amoeba" that starts life - but rather that the earth formed from the accretion disc of the sun (or of "some sun") and then life on earth eventually 'arose' the dust, rock, gas etc starting point.
Hince the well stated and simplified 'pile of dirt'. -- irrefutable.
And "sufficiently talented" deals with the claim that all of this grand story telling deals requires that it is inherent in the properties of matter itself - to do what was done -- rather than a divine being causing it. -- irrefutable.
This simple life then evolved into all living things we know today, yes.
Indeed the "story" is that once you get to some single celled bacteria - over time you will get to "horse".
However, this process took some 3.6 billion years.
Which is where the addition of "
a sufficiently talented and long period of time filled with improbable just-so stories that are easy enough to tell - but they are not science" comes in.
Rather than refuting the details in that summary - you appear to be confirming every one!!
I challenge you to find a single scientific source that defines evolution like that.
Again the fact that you prefer not to summarize your beliefs in the details that you cannot at all refute - is a given.
The fact that evolutionist sources would seek to avoid that level of candor is also not a proof against it.
==============================================================
Yet, you pretend as if we would be able to "redo" such a process in the lab.
There are a great many ways to simulate time in the lab as we know in cases where producing oil or coal or diamonds is the objective when under normal conditions it would take longer. But in the summary statement that aspect is not mentioned at all -- rather the summary I give just states the "story" we are getting from believers in evolutionism.
Certainly the Bible account can be summarized as 'infinite God came to earth - formatted it for life and then created life on earth in stages over a period of 6 earth days - and rested the 7th day" --
From what I read, you actually know very little concerning this topic.
Another sign of your 'belief system' - try to confine yourself to actual fact.