Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Where did this idea come from ?In science a theory is as good as it gets.
What evolutionism does is remove original sin as well as mans sin nature from being a by-product of disobedience into an unbiblical realm of thought.
To accept evolutionism much of the bible needs to be rewritten.
The quote from above is unbiblical "at some point of maturity in human's evolution, God breathes a soul into it, and Adam becomes the self-aware"
The bible doesn't teach this. The bible teaches that sin came into the world through one man, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because all sinned. Romans 5:12 instructs us on how sin came to spread. What is written there doesn't say a population of pre-humans evolved and God breathed a soul into the population.
Romans continues with ...For if the many died by the trespass of the one man,...then states it again....For if, by the trespass of the one man, death reigned through that one man,...then states it again.....Therefore, just as one trespass brought condemnation for all men,...and again with ...For just as through the disobedience of the one man the many were made sinners. Romans 5 has to be completely re-written.
Where did this idea come from ?
There is much that is provable, beyond doubt, and totally in line with God's Word.
The theories men come up with or believe, the ones opposed to God entirely, are not provable.
Where did this idea come from ?
There is much that is provable, beyond doubt, and totally in line with God's Word.
The theories men come up with or believe, the ones opposed to God entirely, are not provable.
Even if that were correct(I don't believe it is), so what ?The idea of "no proof in science" is a widely accepted point of view in the philosophy of science.
Oh, I see...... take that up with YHWH then. It is His Word .There are those who believe that certain things can be proven from the Bible. However, this is a belief and not provable.
Even if that were correct(I don't believe it is), so what ?
So what ?The "so what" is that science makes no claim to being infallible and admits that new information can absolutely destroy a theory. Most people have never even heard of Darwin's other major theory. Evidence very quickly relegated to the scientific trash heap. It is actually a great tragedy that theology cannot admit fallibility.
Oh, I see...... take that up with YHWH then. It is His Word .
Who said science is right, let alone infallible ?
It is an assumption on your part that I have not. Your assumption is "unprovable". If I claimed that YHWH approved of my views, that would also be unprovable.
In a way, very strangely, and perversely, that is correct (carnally).In the final analysis the only validation of science lies in the question "Does it work?" Yes, science does work and works extremely well. It is arguably the most successful enterprise mankind has ever undertaken.
YHWH does not approve of your views. That is provable. (but not on this forum due to the rules of the forum, and the worldliness thereof)
I made no assumption about anything as far as I know.
I think I'll leave that to others to prove. (no worries, they already did).Your assumption is the portion of your post that I have bolded. It is completely improvable.
Not just religion that confusses fact for belief. As I've already said the belief that evolution is scientific fact is a superstition that is fact free.With religion superstition can be greater than obvious fact
Here you are taking your believes and reading them into scripture, instead of reading what it actualy says.The revelation that Adam and Eve, 2 incarnate celestial beings
Here we go again with "proof". In science a theory is as good as it gets. There is no such thing as proving a theory because to do so would require that we know everything that the theory touches on and that is obviously impossible. New information can and has resulted in existing theories having to be either modified or discarded completely. The theory of evolution is based on enormous empirical evidence and explanatory power. In 150 years nothing has seriously challenged the theory of evolution in spite of concerted efforts to do so. Taken on a worldwide basis, of all the scientists working in the earth and life sciences only 1/10th of 1% are not evolutionists.
The scripture is what the authors believed in ignorance when they were written, or rather rewritten, during the Babylonian captivity. The Hebrew priest appropriated Mesopotamian lore in the construction of their own exaggerated history. That history, preserved in fragmented form, gives us a glimpse of the past in the part that they bent to fit their own agenda.Not just religion that confusses fact for belief. As I've already said the belief that evolution is scientific fact is a superstition that is fact free.
Here you are taking your believes and reading them into scripture, instead of reading what it actualy says.
Please justify this.The scripture is what the authors believed in ignorance when they were written, or rather rewritten, during the Babylonian captivity. The Hebrew priest appropriated Mesopotamian lore in the construction of their own exaggerated history. That history, preserved in fragmented form, gives us a glimpse of the past in the part that they bent to fit their own agenda.
The evolution of life from primitive life forms is a fact outside of the agenda of religion.
Evolution works. That's why scientists accept it.Actually proof is a vital part of science.
Ever theory has to be demonstrated to weork, either mathmatically or practically.
So most of your reply is nonsence.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?