• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Adam and Eve (Nondualism Interpretation)

Jonaitis

Soli Deo Gloria
Jan 4, 2019
5,360
4,308
Wyoming
✟158,257.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
I’ve been reflecting on the story of Adam and Eve and thought it might be interesting to explore it through the lens of nondualism and seeing reality as it is. I’d love to hear your thoughts.

Here’s my take:

The story of Adam and Eve can be seen as an allegory for the moment when humanity shifted from simply being present in the flow of reality to seeing the world through the lens of separation—dualism.

Think about the Garden of Eden. It represents pure presence, unity, and wholeness. Adam and Eve are in harmony with life, not questioning or labeling it. They’re living in what nonduality calls reality as it is—a state of being where there’s no self vs. other, no good vs. evil, just the seamless unfolding of life.

Then comes the serpent, which can symbolize the emergence of conceptual thought or ego. The serpent tempts them with the idea of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, which introduces judgment, labeling, and dualistic thinking. By eating the fruit, Adam and Eve begin to see the world in terms of opposites: right/wrong, good/bad, me/you, us/them. This act of labeling creates a sense of separation from the oneness of the garden.

The "banishment from Eden" isn’t about punishment—it’s about the shift from living in the freedom of direct experience to living in a mental construct of reality. Instead of just being, we start to live through the filter of concepts, judgments, and stories, which veil the simple truth of what is.

But here’s the hopeful part: Eden isn’t gone. It’s still here, right now, as the reality beneath all those mental filters. The invitation of nondualism is to stop eating the “fruit” of judgment and step back into the garden—not as a physical place, but as the recognition of reality as it is. Freedom is always here and now, once we let go of the illusion of separation.

What do you think? Is the story of Adam and Eve an allegory for the human experience of duality and the possibility of awakening to reality as it is? Curious to hear your thoughts
 

Mark Quayle

Monergist; and by reputation, Reformed Calvinist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2018
14,313
6,389
69
Pennsylvania
✟960,221.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Widowed
I’ve been reflecting on the story of Adam and Eve and thought it might be interesting to explore it through the lens of nondualism and seeing reality as it is. I’d love to hear your thoughts.

Here’s my take:

The story of Adam and Eve can be seen as an allegory for the moment when humanity shifted from simply being present in the flow of reality to seeing the world through the lens of separation—dualism.

Think about the Garden of Eden. It represents pure presence, unity, and wholeness. Adam and Eve are in harmony with life, not questioning or labeling it. They’re living in what nonduality calls reality as it is—a state of being where there’s no self vs. other, no good vs. evil, just the seamless unfolding of life.

Then comes the serpent, which can symbolize the emergence of conceptual thought or ego. The serpent tempts them with the idea of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, which introduces judgment, labeling, and dualistic thinking. By eating the fruit, Adam and Eve begin to see the world in terms of opposites: right/wrong, good/bad, me/you, us/them. This act of labeling creates a sense of separation from the oneness of the garden.

The "banishment from Eden" isn’t about punishment—it’s about the shift from living in the freedom of direct experience to living in a mental construct of reality. Instead of just being, we start to live through the filter of concepts, judgments, and stories, which veil the simple truth of what is.

But here’s the hopeful part: Eden isn’t gone. It’s still here, right now, as the reality beneath all those mental filters. The invitation of nondualism is to stop eating the “fruit” of judgment and step back into the garden—not as a physical place, but as the recognition of reality as it is. Freedom is always here and now, once we let go of the illusion of separation.

What do you think? Is the story of Adam and Eve an allegory for the human experience of duality and the possibility of awakening to reality as it is? Curious to hear your thoughts
Scriptural support for that notion?
 
Upvote 0